Talk:WOGX

WOGX has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 31, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from WOGX appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 November 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the FCC canceled a permit to build a Florida TV station, finding that "the most prominent facility complete within the studio building appears to be a toilet"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WOGX.

Wikipedia

WOGX coverage in Citrus County

As mentioned by CFIF, WOGX's website mentions that they cover Citrus County. However, neither Bright House nor Comcast offer the station on Citrus County systems, opting only for WTVT. Because of this, I removed the Tampa bay TV template. -- azumanga 08:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:WOGX/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 16:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 20:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this shortly. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I checked every 8th ref and everything checked out therefore I see no reason to dig further. Refs I checked: [1][2][3][4][5] IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2c. it contains no original research.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Copyvio found no issues. [6] IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Who is even editing radio networks? (that is other than Sammie) IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	The one image used is PD. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	7. Overall assessment.	I'm going to put this on hold until Sammi Brie can get back to me on the feedback I have provided thus far. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] This article is well sourced, well-written, neutral, and goes into depth on the topic. Pass IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

using virtual channel 51. appears to be unsourced. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Dropped this part. (It's in the "so obvious the ref won't say it" department.)
whose newscasts it simulcasts. What does "simulcasts" mean? Is it reasonable to either give a quick explanation (unless it's a term widely known) or wikilink it? IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikilinked simulcast.
Should "channel" be capitalized when talking about specific channels, such as channel 51? IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- News media and headlines do tend to do this, but I don't. Previous guidance from me in Talk:KDNL-TV/GA1: We don't capitalize it, but a lot of media outlets will. (We only capitalize "channel" in running text in the name of an organization, and the cases similar to this are generally non-US entities, things like Channel 4).
Big Sun TV vacated it in June I'm assuming you mean June 1981 but just wanted to confirm. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's 1983. Glad you found that.
analyzed buying the station may sound better as contimplated buying the station or considered buying the station but let me know what you think. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
analyzed buying the station from Wabash Valley but opted not to do so. Is there a specific reason given for why they didn't? IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, no.

@IntentionallyDense: Responded. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good to me! IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron talk 08:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the FCC canceled a permit to build a Florida TV station, finding that "the most prominent facility complete within the studio building appears to be a toilet"? Source: https://www.genealogybank.com/newspaper-clippings/ocalans-seek-tv-permit/nkftxzwyjxsrukjfdkwopaexpcyspffu_ip-10-166-46-157_1711486828756
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Sugrue

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 718 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]