Talk:White Rabbit (Lost)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the White Rabbit (Lost) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

White Rabbit (Lost) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 26, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Television: Episode coverage / Lost Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Lost task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:White Rabbit (Lost)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BenLinus1214 (talk · contribs) 21:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a well-sourced, exemplary television episode article. Tabula Rasa and other similar articles were passed, so I don't see how this would be any exception. Just give me a couple hours. BenLinus 1214^talk 21:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Newyorkadam: Good work here, and I don't have any major comments. Just a few writing points and a sourcing question before I pass:

You should probably put a period in the caption for the Christian Shepherd image.

Is the paragraph that begins "In the scene when Jack is dangling from the cliff" completely sourced to that one ref? It's fine if it is, but it was a bit unclear to me.

All of that is covered in one ref, but I've added the ref in several places throughout the paragraph to make it more clear. Please let me know if that will suffice.

"In the previous episode, "Walkabout", Christian was played by a stand-in actor, as his actor hadn't been cast yet; thus, his face was not shown, only the back of his head was." This sentence is a little bit clunky and contains too much repetition of the word "actor." I would recommend something like, "In the previous episode, "Walkabout", Christian was played by a stand-in actor, as the character hadn't been cast yet; thus, only the back of his head was shown." ("only the back of his head" implies that his face wasn't shown, either).

@BenLinus1214: Thank you for the review— I think I've made all of the changes you suggested. -Newyorkadam (talk) 23:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

Good job! Looking at the article history, you've basically amped this article up to GA single-handedly! Nice one! :) BenLinus 1214^talk 23:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: