Template talk:Popular articles
 | On 26 June 2009, Template:Popular articles was linked from The New York Times blog, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
 | This template (Template:Popular articles) was considered for deletion on 2010 January 30. The result of the discussion was "mark {{historical}}". |
No updates
[edit]"This data is not being updated at present". Why ? Can anyone explain what is the problem ? Glover (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Alternative display options
[edit]I'd like to have this displayed on my user talk page similar to that implemented at User:Glover by proprietary tweaking. If it could fit above or below {{Signpost-subscription}} on my talk page that would suit my fancy presicely. Perhaps a small=yes field could be included? __meco (talk) 11:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- See Template:Popular_articles#Usage. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Display of more/standalone-page results
[edit]I'm trying to remove the floating ">>more" link on WP:POPULAR but the bot that updates this template overwrites the changes. Waiting to hear from bot-maintainer on bot's talk-page. DMacks (talk) 07:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is now possible by using the template with
...|nolink=true}}. But the link has been changed anyway, see answer at bot's talk-page. --Numbo3 (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, actually only 39,120 and not "more than 250,000 visitors went to the misspelled entry “Micheal Jackson.”" ;-p The 250,000+ redirect was Michael jackson ;-)
BTW: It's a pity that any action path (/enwiki/w/index.php) is ignored by our Squid cache servers, at least in counting them as "views" (/wiki/), actually inaccurate in respect of &oldid permalinks. Because of this we cannot see any meaningful jump there, unfortunately. --Melancholie (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)