User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Uncle Bash007

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.

General notability guidelines

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: In general, I believe it is particularly important to assume good faith in that, new editors are here to contribute but not to harm Wikipedia. Even though they might not be aware of Wikipedia policies and guidelines and as such may make some mistakes trying to contribute. Assuming good faith create good links between editors of varrying experience and may inspire new ones to stay and keep editing rather than get scared and stop editing entirely due to hostility and pressure from more experinced once. Hence, new editors are an integral part of the Wikimedia movement as they bring along fresh ideas, new creativities and innovations and contribute a long lasting works.

One must also recognise that everyone including experienced editors can make mistakes and thus, good faith helps in guiding editors on Wikpedia.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

2. In your own words, how is notability defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: Notability in Wikipedia means certain criteria that a topic needs to meet before it is to be accepted as a standalone article. Notability deals with the encyclopedic suitability of a topic. An article must therefore meet the meet the general notability guidelines and  the  subject-specific notability guidelines. The general notablity guidelines simply deals with coverage received by a topic from sources that are independent of the subject. While specific notability guidelines deals with the significance and prominancy of a specific subject in relation to academics, books, events, geographical features, music, organizations, people, sports etc. and it has to be free from what Wikipedia is not policies.

Y. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No, because from what Wikipedia is not policies; Wikpedia is not a manual book, guidebook, textbook or journal.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: From my understanding, GNG deals with the recognition of a subject from independent reliable sources. While, specific notability guidelines deals with the notability or importance of the subject in relation to some specific guidelines or topics such as academics, books, events, geographical features, music, organizations, people, sports among others. Thus, when patrollling an article one must recognise the subject specific guidelines of the article first as an important topic may lack sufficient independent sources in some cases. Therefore, GNG covers the aspect of coverage from reliable sources that are independent from the subject, while specific notabiity guidelines focus on the notability of the subject itself.

Y. Both can be used to review a new article; however specific notability does not superseded GNG. Note and xxample: certain subjects would not meet GNG due to the fact that no article talk about them directly in length and in dept such the academics- WP:PROF - who would received few or none independence source talk about them (we would see BBC write an article about car stuck in a tree see here but not the President of Australian National University would be hard to find) Other SGN such as WP:NCORP and WP:NPOL specify a very strict set of source criteria and requirements respectively. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Specific notability guidelines

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: From Wikipedia:PAGEDECIDE guide, a future event may clearly be suitable for a standalone page (such as summer olympics). However, before creating such articles, one should make sure that the likelihood of the future event occurring is reasonably assures. Therefore, before creating a topic 2024 Summer Olympics page, there must be confirmation from a reliable sources on the occurrence of the event. Hence, since the editor did not create any source, the subject may be considered not notable until evidence is provided from reliable independent sources.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

6. A New York city based 2021 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: not notable because 1) Wikipedia is not a newspaper Wikipedia:NOTNEWS nor means of promotion Wikipedia:PROMOTION 2) The statement above is done in a form of news or promotion of the just starting software company receiving huge amount of investment. In Wikipedia, one can add recent updates but, in an objective and unbiased style, free from puffery.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

7. Guram Kutateladze who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-2.

Answer: Notable. 1) the above statement has met SSN guidelines of prominent sports and athlete with outstanding record in the Ultimate Fighting Championships. 2) The statement was written in an objective and unbiased style and free from mere puffery. However, the subject may be not notable since Wikipedia is not a directory and the statement consist of directory.

N - Based on WP:NMMA - the guideline is: Have been ranked in the world top 10 in their division by either Sherdog (sherdog.com) or Fight Matrix (fightmatrix.com) and subject has not received such ranking stated. Pls check the SNG next time prior answering or reviewing articles. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2022 and to be released on August 2023 in the cinemas.

Answer: Not Notable 1) from Wikipedia:Notability (films), films should only have their own pages if the principal photography of the film is released. 2). No matter how high-profile release may be as nothing is certain in the face of production, casting issues may interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2021 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: Notable 1) The candidate have met the Wikipedia:POLITICIAN guidelines in that even though he had not being previously elected for a political role, he has multiple coverages from local newspapers. 2). The guideline states that just being a political candidate elected or unelected does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guidelines (have enough coverages from independent sources.

N Local coverage needs to be something outside of his campaign to be used for notability. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2020 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: Not notable 1). The subject has not met several guidelines in that, he has only one album; has not being covered from many reliable indepent sources (not from multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself) 2). Even though his song was listed in a popular national and international Music streaming provider, the subject has failed to meet several criteria and such it is not notable for a standalone article

Y. Cassiopeia talk

C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: 1). Notable under Wikipedia:NACADEMICS in that he has met criteria 1,2,4,5,7 & 8

2(a). Criteria 1 states that: The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. Hence, Carlos has worked extensively in in game theory, bounded rationality, social choice, and  behavioral economics

(b). Criteria 2 stated that: The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. Hence, the subject has met this criteria in that he is a speaker of the interdisciplinary research unit "Psychoeconomics," funded by the German Research Foundation (GRF)

(c). Criteria 4: The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. Carlos har authored and co-authored important books and worked on many significant topics, game theory, behavioural economics etc.

(d) Criteria 5: The person has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon). Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level, and thus Carlos became a full professor of microeconomics at the University of Konstanz (Germany, 2005) and later moved to the University of Cologne (Germany, 2012)

(e) Criteria 7: The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. Criterion 7 may also be satisfied if the person has authored widely popular general audience books on academic subjects provided the author is widely regarded inside academia as a well-established academic expert and provided the books deal with that expert's field of study. Thus, Carlos has authored and co-authored several books covering important topics on Nature Human Behaviour, Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Economic Literature etc.

(f) Criteria 8: The person has been head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area. Thus, Carlos is the editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Psychology.

Y. Being a professor does not meet WP:NPROF criteria 5. However the subject meets WP:NPROF #1 - see [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2]. Cassiopeia talk 10:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: 1.) Notable under Wikipedia:NSPORT 2). Based on Wikipedia:NMMA fighter is notable if have been ranked in the world top 10 in their division by either Sherdog (sherdog.com) or Fight Matrix(fightmatrix.com), and hence, Overeen was listed by Sherdog as 2010 All-Violence Second Team and 2015 All-Violence Third Team. The subject has also met many other criteria in that he is well recognised all over the world with enough coverages from several independent sources covering details of his biography and career. He finished first at many championship and has a world record as the first fighter to hold world titles in MMA and K-1 kickboxing at the same time.

Answer again: 1.) Notable under Wikipedia:NSPORT

(2)a. under criteria Wikipedia:NKICK "Have been ranked in the world top-10 by a major, preferably two, independent publication that meets the definition of a reliable source". Thus Overeem have being ranked 4th in the world in the heavyweight division of Glory and was the first fighter to hold world titles in MMA and K-1 kickboxing at the same time.

(b) Wikipedia:NMMA and has met criteria that: "Have been ranked in the world top 10 in their division by either Sherdog (sherdog.com) or Fight Matrix(fightmatrix.com)." Overeen was hence, listed by Sherdog as 2010 All-Violence Second Team and 2015 All-Violence Third Team. Furthermore, he is a former Strikeforce Heavyweight Champion, Dream Heavyweight Champion, K-1 World Grand Prix Champion.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 10:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: 1) Notable under Wikipedia:Notability (music) and Wikipedia:Notability (films) 2). Lopez is well prominent and has met many SSN criteria in both #Music and Film industries. She has sufficient coverages from many reliable sources. She has being covered from many independent sources in both national and international tours and concerts. She remains the only female entertainer to have a number one album and film simultaneously in the United States (The recording has appeared on any country's national music chart). She had specialised in her art and recieved many international awards such as World Music Awards with the Legend Award for her contribution to the arts, she was the first woma to recieve the Billboard Icon Award, She is also the first and only person in history to receive both the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award and MTV Movie & TV Awards' Generation Award for her accomplishments in music, film and television. From these accomplishments and prominence in both music and films, Lopez is notable enough for a standalone article as she had met almost every aspect of notability (both SSN and GNG)

Answer again:

1)A Notable under Wikipedia:Notability (music) and Wikipedia:Notability (films)

2)a. Notable under Wikipedia:SINGER under criteria 1: Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself - This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries. Thus, Lopez became the first Hispanic actress to earn over US$1 million for a film. She went on to star in Anaconda (1997) and Out of Sight (1998), and established herself as the highest-paid Hispanic actress in Hollywood. She became the first woman to have a number-one album and film in the same week. Her 2002 release, J to tha L–O! The Remixes, became the first remix album in history to debut atop the US Billboard 200. Billboard magazine ranked her as the ninth greatest dance club artist of all time in 2016.

b). Criteria 2: Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart. She became the first remix album in history to debut atop the US Billboard 200. She is considered the most influential Hispanic entertainer in North America. In 2012, Forbes ranked her the world's most powerful celebrity, and the 38th most powerful woman in the world. She has successful singles on the US Billboard Hot 100 which include "If You Had My Love", "I'm Real", "Ain't It Funny", "All I Have" and "On the Floor"

c) Criteria 5: Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels. As of 2022, Lopez has sold more than 80 million records worldwide. Her album J to tha L-O! The Remixes was acknowledged by the Guinness World Records as the first number one remix album in the United States. In 2010, Lopez was honored by the World Music Awards with the Legend Award for her contribution to the arts.

d) Criteria 7: Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. Thus, Lopez is considered a pop culture icon.

e) Criteria 8: Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award. Consequently, Lopez has received the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award in 2008, at the 2018 MTV Video Music Awards, making her the first Latin performer to claim the prize since its introduction in 1984. In 2022, she became the first person of Latin descent to receive the MTV Generation Award at the MTV Movie & TV Awards. She is also the first and only person in history to receive both the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award and MTV Movie & TV Awards' Generation Award for her accomplishments in music, film and television.

f) Criteria 8: In that; "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable" - Lopez has featured in many TV shows and serve as juror etc. "She returned to prominence in 2011 with her appearance as a judge on American Idol."

1).B. Notable under Wikipedia:NFOE in that

a) Criteria 1: The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. Thus, Lopez films has been widely distributed and had received many critism from nationally known critics such as: Andrew Barker of Variety who commented that: "Despite a carefully cultivated image as an imperious pop empress in ludicrously expensive outfits, her signature hits bear the titles 'I'm Real' and 'Jenny From the Block'. She managed the perilous transition from actress to music star without ever seeming to pick either as a primary gig. She established herself as an oft-provocative sex symbol while her demeanor made it abundantly clear that she's not asking you to come hither." Lynette Holloway of The New York Times described Lopez as overexposed among others. In 2019, she garnered critical acclaim for her performance as a stripper in the crime drama Hustlers.

b) Criteria 2: The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking. Thus, many of Lopez has a landmark star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, and has received the Billboard Icon Award and the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award, among other honors.

Y. Notable under SINGER#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #12 and NACTOR#1, #2, #3. Cassiopeia talk 10:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: 1). Notable under Wikipedia:EVENTCRITERIA 2) This article has met so many SSN guidelines in that; it has an enduring historical significance and have enough coverages worldwide, the event had a widespread impact on the US soil and US nuclear power plant history (being rated Level 5 accident with wider consequences). The accident also crystallized anti-nuclear safety concerns among activists and the general public, and and resulted in new regulations for the nuclear industry - as such it had a lasting effect which in part qualifies it for a standalone article. The event has also demonstrated a long-term impact on the US soil and therefore met the Wikipedia:GEOSCOPE. The event also resulted in the release of radioactive gases and radioactive iodine into the environment which causes increase in the rate of cancer around the area in such it has met both Wikipedia:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, Wikipedia:DIVERSE and many more.

Answer again:

1). Notable under Wikipedia:EVENTCRITERIA

2)a) Notable under criteria 1: Events are probably notable if they have enduring historical significance and meet the general notability guideline, or if they have a significant lasting effect. Hence, Three Mile Island accident has an enduring historical significance and have enough coverages worldwide, the event had a widespread impact on the US soil and US nuclear power plant history (being rated Level 5 accident with wider consequences). The accident also crystallized anti-nuclear safety concerns among activists and the general public, and and resulted in new regulations for the nuclear industry - as such it had a lasting effect which in part qualifies it for a standalone article. The event has also demonstrated a long-term impact on the US soil and therefore met the Wikipedia:GEOSCOPE. The event also resulted in the release of radioactive gases and radioactive iodine into the environment which causes increase in the rate of cancer around the area in such it has met both Wikipedia:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, Wikipedia:DIVERSE and many more.

b) Has met Criteria 2 which states that: Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards (as described below). Thus, The accident was considered to have a widespread impact on the US soil and US nuclear power plant history (being rated Level 5 accident with wider consequences).

Y. Cassiopeia talk 10:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

15. Persepolis

Answer: 1). Geographic features 2). The topic was notable in that it has met several Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) criteria, in that; it is a historical place and a certified heritage center by UNESCO and have historical, socio-economic and cultural important and also an architectural symbol of the Persian Empire.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

---

Uncle Bash007, Good day. See assignment 1 above.

(1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs (see Help:Diff for instructions) of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.

(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.

(3) Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment).

(4) Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.

(5) If you need to take a break from editing Wikipedia for more than 2 weeks, pls inform me so I may know. If you Stay safe and best. Welcome to NPPS.

Cassiopeia talk 09:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Hello, I have completed the comprehension questions but certain instructions are not clear like; (1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs (see Help:Diff for instructions) of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable!.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 The point 1 about is to provide hist diffs where there is necessary for the questions. If info of the edit and your message to the editor on their talk page are those need to provide hist diff for reference or justification or prove then provide the hist diff. If the revert or report to certain Wikipedia venue are relevant then provide those (example, you place a CSD (criteria for speedy deletion) tag on the article or you place a message to the editor for Copyright issue). I will review the assignment in one or two day. Cassiopeia talk 09:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 See partial review and You need to provide the criteria - pls read part B under "Specific notability guidelines " again on how to answer the questions. Ping when you are finished. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Mr.Cassiopeia, I have answered the comprehension questions again. Thank youUncle Bash007 (talk) 08:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007. Pls read the Part C: Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations. This means you need to provide the guidelines (provide link) and which creteria of the guidelines stated. For example: Wikipedia:NACADEMICS criteria 2,3 and 10 then provide reasons. Kindly provide info as requested. Cassiopeia talk 04:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Well-done. Pls note that all communication about the program state in the communication section at the bottom of the assignment and not my talk page. Pls let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 10:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 pls let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 10:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Cassiopeia, Thank you for taking time to review my exercise. I was just wondering whether how far have we gone so far and how many more do we have to better prepare for it. I am ready to continue with the next stage. Thank youUncle Bash007 (talk) 10:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 For your info, all communication regarding the program should be stated in the communication section (here) below the assingment and not on the program page. I have moved your question from the program talk page to here. There are a total of 10 assignment but 2 of the assignments are mainly review and info and no questions to be answered. There is one final exam at the end of the program. Cassiopeia talk 10:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Sources

Background for trainees

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary. WP:New page patrol source guide and WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources may be a useful reference for looking up the reliability of a source that has been discussed before on Wikipedia.

You can contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on the web due to paywalls or offline-only sources.

---

Exercises

1.

Topic	Explanation	5 Examples	Comment by Cass
Reliable source	means a criteria that strictly make sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered in a neutral point of view by an independent, reputable and original sources that are fact checking, trusted and non-questionable, non-self published nor user-generated. Reliability depends on both the i) the piece of work (book, article..) ii). The creator of the work (the writer, journalist) and (iii). The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press)	(example)The Guardian newspaper Reuters news agency Interfax Agence France-Presse United Press International Associated Press	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
User generated sources	Are sources that are largely generated by the user or the content are in favour of the user, especially personal websites and personal or group blogs (bbut excluding newspapers and magazine blogs), social media handles, fansites, video and image hosting services, most wikis and other collaboratively created websites.	Ancestry.com Facebook Fandom IMDb Instagram	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Non Independent source	A non-independent source is the opposite of independent source, that is, are topics that cover an interest or biased perspective. Non independent sources have no editorial independence and have conflict of interest. For instance, a press release is said to be non independent if it is written either by the business or organization it is written about, or by a business or person hired by or affiliated with the organization. However, non-independent sources may be used to source content for articles, but the connection of the source to the topic must be clearly identified. They include contents from Press releases, Syndicate stories or conflict of insterest.	Google News DuckDuckGo Print syndication web syndication Facebook	{{tick}. Not independent source can NOT be used to contribute to the notability of an article. Just like self source, it can only be used sparingly which indicated directly about a subject after the subject has already established notability requirements that required. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

---

2.

Type	Explanation	Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary)	Comment by Cass
Primary	Are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved. They offer a direct insider view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political decision, and so on.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC) (example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results Historical documents such as diaries are primary sources An account of a traffic incident written by a witness is a primary source An interview on the biography of a politician is a primary source An introduction of the new Tesla cars by the CEO of Tesla company inc. is a primary source	Y. By the way, pls provide another 10 more examples (see the requirements needed above) Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Secondary	is one step removed from primary source, that is it provides the authors' thinking based on the primary source. It contains an author's analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Secondary sources generally depend on the information provided by the primary sources. For instance, a paper reviewing a research is a secondary source of that research.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC) (example) newspaper Magazines TV news Documentaries A true live story (movie) A discussion on a topic	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Tertiary	are publications such as encyclopedias and other compendia that summarize, and often quote, primary and secondary sources. Wikipedia and many other undergraduate textbooks are regarded as tertiary sources because they contain information from many secondary sources.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC) (example) encyclopedias Compendiums Wikipedia Modern Physical Geography (1978), John Willey and Sons, Newyork Commons	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

---

3.

Subject	Primary	Secondary	Tertiary	Comment by Cass
Example: Art	Example:Sculpture	Example:Article critiquing the sculpture	Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History	Example: Civilization	Example: The ancient Greek Civilization	Example: Encyclopedia article Ancient Greece	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Science	Energy	Newton's Law of Motion	Newton's laws of motion	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Athletes	world's highest-paid athletes	Forbes, The World's Highest-Paid Athletes 2022. [[3]]	Forbes list of the world's highest-paid athletes	Y. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

---

4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia which means anyone can edit and as such some may come along with a form of bias of vandalism, and this may over-hype or damage the reputation of biography of living person or providing false information. Therefore, every content must be verified using inline citations from reliable source. Patrollers and administrators needs to ensure that all quotations, material whose verifiability has been challenged, all material that is likely to be challenged and all contentious matter about living and recently deceased persons are well cited from reliable sources.

Y. Content needs to verifiable so we may know where the info/source from for we could know if the source is independent and reliable, and not because it is the facts or true - see WP:But it's true!. If source indicated XXX is from Jamaica but the fact XXX is from Cuba, we put XXX is from Jamaica in article as per source. We will correct the info when the sources (not need to be the same source) correct itself. For example Alexander the Great - How he die is based on which sources you read, from poising, to malaria and typhoid fever to infectious (meningitis) to acute pancreatitis and etc. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: Wikipedia and websites mirroring Wikipedia as a source should not be used as sources since Wikipedia is considered as user-generated sources. Content from a Wikipedia article is not considered reliable unless it is backed up by citing confirmed reliable sources that support the contents. However, Wikipedia can be used as primary source if Wikipedia or sister projects is being discussed in the project, but it has to follow the primary source policy.

Y. Wikipedia can not be the sources as the content of Wikipedia is supported by "other sources" - See WP:CIRCULAR. Wikipedia is a online knowledge sharing platform. Readers should check the sources in the article and verify/read the info themselves. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. A source can be reliable but not independent but not independent when it is sourced from a reputable source but the contents are self-interest or biased. Example, when a magazine publish a story about a product based on information provided by the director or founder of the company.

Y Provided the magazine is a reliable source in the first place. Cassiopeia talk 06:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: An independent source is a source that has no vested interest in a given Wikipedia topic and therefore is commonly expected to cover the topic from a disinterested perspective. Independent sources have editorial independence (advertisers do not dictate content) and no conflicts of interest. An article is therefore independent but not reliable when the source are independent of the topic but rely heavily of rumors, gossips, extremists etc.

{{cross} an independent source means the source has no association, affiliation, connection with the subject such as my website has not association with US defense department or I do not have personal nor business connection with Bill Gates or Microsoft where my website has written an article about Gates and his company - that is an independent source but since it is just my website and there is not a reputable fact checking site, that would considered not reliable. Cassiopeia talk

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Example Article about Bill Gates

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamhgates/	Linkedin is considered not independent as the info is provided by the subject.	Since the content is self-published, thus it is considered not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy source	The source provide significant info about the subject	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

8.

David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/	USA Today is shown to maintain a generally center-left audience, in regards to political persuasion	The story can be regarded as reliable since it include information from both primary, secondary and third-party sources	The source provide significant coverage of the subject	✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch	CNN is regarded as an Independent news agency	The information is reliable as it shows a visual swearing in	The topic may not be sufficient to a stand-alone article as it provide very less information about the subject.	✘ No
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893	The site Huffposts is independent but may be biased towards politics	Its editors are known for fact-checking and accuracy source and therefore reliable	the page covers significant coverage about the topic	✘ No
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012	Geni.com is a commercial genealogy and social website that allows self-published content	Geni include only primary sources without fact checking, thus it is not reliable. Geni.com may be usable under WP:BLPPRIMARY to support reliable secondary sources, but should not interpreted with original research.	The site provide significant coverage of the subject	✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005	Vanity Fair is a well recognised magazine characterized by energetic writing, indepth reporting and social commentary	the publication is reliable in that it is trusted with accuracy	it has provided significant coverages on the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html	Frontline is an independent magazine by PBS	the magazine relies on people opinions which may be biased and not reliable	it provide significant coverage on the subject	✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html	The Independent is an independent newspaper	The newspaper is comsidered reliable source for non-specialist information	it has has significant coverage of the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: The subject has met the subject notability guidelines WP:BASIC in that it reliable independent sources both primary and secondary with in-depth coverages and the subject has received awards from the US government etc.

Y. Huffpost - Although HuffPost contributors is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. She won five Grand Slam singles titles. Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/	Instagram is user generated and may subject to rumors	It is generally not reliable for fact checking	It provided direct information about the subject	✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html	Los Angeles Times are independent of the subject interests	They are generally considered as reliable source	They provide significant coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
	The Potomac Books is an Independent journal from the University of Nebraska Press	It is thus reliable	It provide significant coverage	✔ Yes
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis	ESPN has being accused of bias coverage and therefore is not an independent source	It can be reliable in some cases but not towards special topics. That is, it is reliable but not independent	it covers significant coverage	✘ No
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis	The Guardian is an independent source even though some editors regarded it as being biased towards politics	information giving by the newspaper is based on the author's opinion WP:RSOPINION, it is therefore reliable	It provided detail information on the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Notable under WP:SPORTCRIT in that she has enough coverages from both primary and secondary scources. Notable under WP:NTRACK as she was ranked by Tennis magazine in 2005 as the eighth-greatest female player of the preceding 40 years, youngest-ever Grand Slam champion and youngest-ever world No. 1, Forbes ranked her highest paid athlete for 5 consecutive years. Notable under WP:NTENNIS in that she was the first Swiss player, male or female, to win a major title and attain a world No. 1 ranking, She won five major singles titles, 13 major women's doubles titles (including the Grand Slam etc

Y. Full content from the article Martina Hingis would pass all the WP:NTENNIS criteria. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

12.

Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/	New York Post have criticied by editors for lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including a number of examples of outright fabrication	Editors consider the site more reliable in the period before it changed ownership in 1976.	It provide significant coverage for the subject.	✘ No
https://franklloydwright.org/work/	The site is not independent as it is self published.	Since the content is self published, thus it is considered not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy source	the site provide significant coverage about the subject	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm			The site provide significant coverage about the subject	? Unknown
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC	The Book, Frank Lloyd Wright: His Life and His Architecture is a book dedicated to the life and work of Floyd thus independent	It is reliable since it has no vested interest	The book provide significant information about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: The subject is notable under WP:BASIC in that he receives in-depth coverages from reliable sources and primary sources. He has met WP:ANYBIO in that he is widely recognised in his work in architecture, and he receives honorary recognition for his lifetime achievements. WP:ARCHITECT 1, 2, 3, 4

Y you missed Business week source on rel and ind which both of them are yes - for being a reliable and independent source. Subject passed WP:ARCHITECT 1, 3, 4 but the full article the subject passed WP:ARCHITECT 1, 2, 3, 4. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/	The page is not independent as it is user generated	The site is considered unreliable for fact-checking, although some suggest it should be used as an external link	Empty page	✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales	Bafta is an official site and may not be independent	information from the site may reliable as a primary source	the site provide a significant coverage about the subject	✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125	The site is self-published therefore not independent	The site is not reliable for fact-checking	The page does not exist anymore	✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/	the site is independent	the site is generally reliable for roles credit		✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Not notable as the subject fails to meet any criteria in WP:NACTOR 1 & 2.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

16.

Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim, is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer, Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland. In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html	the site is not independent as Dailymail has a "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication.	The site is generally not reliable and prohibited as a reference or as a source.	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108	The allblacks is the official New Zealand national sport and is considered one of the most succesful sports team in human history	The site may be reliable for fact-checking	The site provide a significant coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308	The site is independent	There is consensus that the site is generally reliable	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html	The site is independent	The site is generally reliable	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: The subject is notable under WP:NATH 1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Y All black source is considered not independent nor reliable for the source is related to the subject (as one of the former players for All Blacks) and there is no independent agent could do the fact checking - this type of source such as all the home page of the subject/subject's company or any professional sport home page can not be used to contribute to the notability requirement as they are considered not independent (if the subject related to the source) and they are also not reliable. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

18.

Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"

Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992)	Peak position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)	2
Denmark (IFPI)	2
US Billboard Hot 100	2

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991)	Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)	3

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/09/arts/grammy-short-list-many-for-a-few.html	New York Times has editing independence	The site is generally reliable for fact-checking	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/RTT	The independence of this site is not clear to me	the site may be reliable since it is a record chart just like Sherdog	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	? Unknown
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/HSI	The independence of this site is not clear to me	the site may be reliable since it is a record chart just like Sherdog	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	? Unknown
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.2024&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.2024.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.2024	Independence of the site is not clear	It may be reliable for fact-checking	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	? Unknown
https://www.musicvf.com/song.php?title=Can%27t+Stop+This+Thing+We+Started+by+Bryan+Adams&id=7272	The independence of the site is not clear to me	The site is reliable	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	? Unknown
https://musicchartsarchive.com/singles/bryan-adams/cant-stop-this-thing-we-started	The site is independent	It is reliable since Vevo uploaded the video on Youtube	The site provide significant coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: The song is notable under WP:NSONG 1,

Y. Those sources (you are not clear of) are considered independent. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

20.

Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_	page not found	page not found	page not found	? Unknown
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/	The site is self-published	can be reliable since the information sited is not sensitive	the site provide significant coverage about the subject	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: not notable. Failed to meet any criteria under WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO & WP:CREATIVE

Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

Uncle Bash007 See assignment 2 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 See comment above. Beside Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources to check source reliability, you can also use Wikipedia:New page patrol source guide. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

---

Content Policy

Article titles

Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below

1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).

References

Answer: Based on the WP:UCRN, Wikipedia does not necessarily use an official name, it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources). the common name listed from these sources are just "Hannibal", therefore, the article name should be changed to Hannibal.

Y.Very well, you tackled two points here - need to change the article name as per WP:COMMONNAME and a redirect from "'Hannibal Barca" to "Hannibal". Cassiopeia talk 05:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.

References

Answer: Based on the WP:UCRN, Magic Johnson is the most recognised name from different reliable sources. It therefore doesn't need to be changed.

Y. The article name complies with the WP:COMMONNAME - the subject is commonly known under this name - therefore no change of article name is needed. Cassiopeia talk 05:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Biographies of living persons

Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.

3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin. The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation. McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

Answer: The content is acceptable in that it has met several BLP guidelines such as: it is written with caution WP:BLPSTYLE, and there is balance in criticism and praise. WP:BLPSOURCES all challenged or likely to be challenged contents are source from reliable sources. It is written with a neutral point of view and avoided victimization WP:AVOIDVICTIM. [[WP:PUBLICFIGURE] the subject is a public figure and content which he may dislikes such as assault are written in an unbiased manner and well sourced from reliable sources.

Y. The first paragraph can be kept - based on [WP:BLPSOURCES]], WP:PUBLICFIGURE and written in WP:NPOV manner - the biographies of living persons it's crucial to provide only information available in multiple independent reliable sources. Such information has to be neutral and should exclude original research.

However, the second paragraph the information on the child should be immediately removed as it is not backed by any sources. (WP:GOSSIP, WP:GRAPEVINE). Cassiopeia talk 05:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213. Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).

References

Answer: The bigraphy is backed by independent reliable sources, however, some contents are unacceptable of inclusion such as: In WP:BLPPRIMARY states that; Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses and the subjects contact has being included in the article therefore it is unacceptable and should be removed.

Y. Good. By the way, the address and tel belong to the White House. Cassiopeia talk 05:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Images copyright

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.

5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: The image is released by the US Department of Defense (DoD) as a public service by the DoD consistent with the DoD’s Principles of Information and it is allowed to be shared. It is therefore accepted since it is under US Government Public Domain accepted and listed as acceptable https://www.dimoc.mil/ http://www.defenseimagery.mil/ (formerly http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil/) – US Department of Defense Visual Information Center (high-resolution US military imagery; use with {{PD-USGov-Military-DVIC}} license template.)

Answer - link/guideline: WP:PDIMG

Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: The image is acceptable as it is released under public domain by Free Images from flickr which are all accepted under General collections on Wikipedia

Answer - link/guideline: WP:PDIMG

Y. We also always need to check the "original site" (the original source) that the image is in PD (public domain). If we click on the flickr link provided on the right of the image it will take your to [4] where it was uploaded by the owner and stated public domain (PD) there. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation: Yes, it is created under Free License on Creative Commons

Answer - link/guideline: WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT

Y. Again we need to check the original source as not all the images are free use claimed by the editor who uploaded the images that the images were taken by them and agree to released the right or the upload the photo is a PD. If we follow the link (source) from Wikimdeia here - Pixabay and it is stated "Free for commercial use" and also on Wikimedia it is verify by reviewer. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: No, Displate is not a free image resources and has zero tolerance to policy for intellectual property rights infringement. Therefore it is not acceptable as it does not support free image use.

Answer - link/guideline: WP:IUPC

Y. One way we could check it to download the image to our computer and use Tineye] where you might able to find some reverse images on the internet. Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Neutral point of view

P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer: She is a beautiful boxer. She turned Pro at the age of 19 on December 14, 2013, after winning an amateur fight in just 20 seconds. It was reported that her skills and marketability made her a fighter to watch right after and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

N - Pls read WP:NPOV (plain, fact, simple texts) and avoid any MOS:PUFF. Cassiopeia talk 09:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Answer again: She is a boxer. She turned professional after winning an amateur fight 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Y.It would be better to remove "20 seconds" as it is an adverb which make the sentence a little not so neutral, unless to win the fight in just 20 seconds have a extremely significant of the bout or her career. Cassiopeia talk 03:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer: He is a Bulgarian actor, who was included in Time's 100: The Most Important People of the Century.. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was 14 and has featured in 44 films.

N - Pls read WP:NPOV (plain, fact, simple texts) and avoid any MOS:PUFF. Do not add anything is not which the original texts such as "who was included in Time's 100: The Most Important People of the Century."

Answer again: He is a Bulgarian actor. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry at the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer: Balance in writing Wikipedia articles is relatively important specially to show neutrality. When two different reliable sources contradict in an opinion. it is best to state each view point thereby maintaining neutrality. Due weight are also important in article writing so as to not give unnecessary attention to a significant minority views thereby making an article a bit confusing or vague, unless when writing articles about such controversies. It is therefore important to stick with the majority views on the topic and perhaps state the little minority under see also.

• Paraphrased from Jimbo Wales' September 2003 post on the WikiEN-l mailing list:

If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with references to commonly accepted reference texts; If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents; If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small minority, it does not belong on Wikipedia, regardless of whether it is true, or you can prove it, except perhaps in some ancillary article.

Y. Take Capital punishment article for example - it provides a balance and due weight content, representing all mainstream points of view in reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 09:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

No original research

Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below

12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer: Wikipedia is built based on research that have been collected and organized from reliable independent sources, if no reliable sources exist, an article should not be created on Wikipedia. The best practice is to summarize information from reliable sources with each statement being verifiable. Hence, if you discover something new, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Wikipedia contents is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, opinions, or experiences. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer: The only way an original research or primary source can be accepted is when they are sourced from reliable independent sources or secondary sources independent of the original research

N. We could use exact words from the source in the article when (1) it is a public domain sites (2) the author/site has released their copyright and anyone to use the content/image such as " agree to irrevocably agree to release content/image under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL or under the Creative Commons license. (3) a direct quote and provide the source. Example Constitution of the United States and in Robert Whittaker (fighter) page (see below direct quote). Cassiopeia talk 09:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

In an interview with GQ Australia, he stated:

I am immensely proud to be an Australian and to be a pioneer in the sport to, you know, lead, lead today's MMA scene against all these other countries, you know, it really, it really does light me up, to see that the Australian flag when I walk out, you know, to hear them called out that I'm Australian and I am very patriotic. I am really proud of my country and proud of where I am from.

References

14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer: Wearing Jeans in Islam

The Muslims clothing according to Shady Alsuleiman for the men and women should be baggy, loose, non-tight, non-transparent, non-attractive and must cover the private parts, therefore jeans are not permissible (for ladies) in Islam.

Y Good. You have indicated the info is from Sh.Shady Alsuleiman. Another way to do it is to use a direct quote (see below). Cassiopeia talk 09:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

“ Islam demands Islam commands us with our with regards of our clothing for both men and women, our clothing must be first of all baggy, so must be loose with a men or women. It must non see-through whether men or women. It must non colorful attractive that means when someone walks everyone's looking at them. ”

References

---

Verifiability

Please read WP:V and answer the questions below

15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer: It should remain 2, because all Wikipedia articles must be attributed to reliable published sources for verification regardless of the editors' views or ideas.

Y very good. Wikipedia is all about verifiability from independent reliable sources. We correct the content when the source corrected itself (same source or other sources). Cassiopeia talk 09:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Uncle Bash007 See assignment 3 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 09:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Pls see the comment above and pls re-read the question and answer again of "Neutral point of view" section. When you have finisned answering the question, pls let me know here "here" and not the assignment talk page. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 09:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia I have re-answered the questions. Thank you.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 03:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 reviewed and see comment. Cassiopeia talk 03:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Filtering - Criteria for speedy deletion

PART 2

We have looked at the requirements needed for a page to meet notable, policy and type of sources to merit a page in Wikipedia in Part 1 (Assignment 1, 2 & 3). In assignment 4, we look at what type of articles need to be filtered out from our system when reviewing a page. There are many criteria of WP:Criteria for speedy deletion. Here we discuss (1) General criteria (G1-G14), (2) Article criteria (A1-A11) and R2.

Please do the following

1. Pls set up your CSD log by installing MYCSD so I could review your CSD nomination. After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.
2. Bookmark Earwig's Copyvio Detector in computer; and install Earwig Copyvio Detector script. (The "copyvio" will appear on the left panel under "Tools" section on every page in Wikipedia.
3. Install CV-revdel and after saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.

General criteria

1. Please (G1-G14) at General and answer the following questions in your own words.

No	Criterion	Application	Comment by Cass
1	G1	Patent nonsense: Applies to gibberish/ nonsense and un-meaningful content or history. It only covers information that are entirely non-sense and un-understandable content. Therefore, anything understandable does not fall under G1, and does not apply to user sandboxes or other pages in the user namespace.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
2	G2	Test pages: This applies to pages created to test editing or other Wikipedia functions. It applies to subpages of the Wikipedia Sandbox created as tests,but does not apply to sandboxes itself, pages in the user namespace, or valid but unused or duplicate templates.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
3	G3	Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes: This applies to pages that are blatant and obvious misinformation, blatant hoaxes (including files intended to misinform), and redirects created by cleanup from page-move vandalism.However, articles about notable hoaxes are accepted if they are written to describe a hoax	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
4	G4	Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: This applies to more identical pages, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. It does not include pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, and pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, nor pages in userspace and draftspace where the content was converted to a draft for improvement, nor content undeleted via a deletion review, or that was only deleted via proposed deletion (including deletion discussions closed as "soft delete") or speedy deletion.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
5	G5	Creations by banned or blocked users: This applies to pages created by users that are banned or blocked who violate the ban or block and their are no other users that make sufficient edit on the page. It only applies to pages created by user when he was banned. For topic-banned editors, it does not apply to other topics. An article qualifies G5 if a banned/blocked editor continue editing via a sockpupet account (when there is no sufficient edits by others.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
6	G6	Technical deletions: This applies to uncontroversial or unchallenged pages such as; deleting empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past, deleting templates orphaned as the result of a consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion, etc.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
7	G7	Author requests deletion: this applies to request made by author in good faith and the the substantial edits on the page are made by the author.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
8	G8	Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page: example, talk pages with no corresponding subject page, subpages with no parent page, file pages without a corresponding file etc.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
9	G9	Office actions: In an exceptional cases, the Wikimedia Foundation office reserves right to speed-delete a page. This type of deletion should not be reversed without prior permission from Wikimedia Foundation	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
10	G10	Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose: this applies to pages entirely intended to harass or intimidate a person or a biographical material that entirely written in a negative tone and uncited	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
11	G11	Unambiguous advertising or promotion: This applies to pages written in an advertising manner and they need to be rewritten to serve as an encyclopedia. Any page written in a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion, however, promotion does not necessarily covers only commercial promotion; people, organisations etc can also be promoted.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
12	G12	Unambiguous copyright infringement: This applies to text pages that contain copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a compatible free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Public-domain and other free content, such as a Wikipedia mirror, do not fall under this criterion, nor is mere lack of attribution of such works a reason for speedy deletion.
13	G13	Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions: This applies to any pages not edited by human, found in; Draft namespace, userspace with an AFC submission - template, userspace with no content except the article wizard placeholder text. However, this kind of pages can be restored upon request by following the procedure at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
14	G14	Unnecessary disambiguation pages: This applies to; disambiguation pages with titles ending in "(disambiguation)" but disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page; isambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of title, a redirect that ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not redirect to a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Article and R2 criteria

1. Please (A1-A11) criteria at WP:CSD#List of criteria and answer the following questions in your own words.

No	Criterion	Application	Comment by Cass
1	A1	No context: This applies to articles which subject is impossible to identify based on the context provided. Doesn't include poorly translated material and non English material. Do not tag this criterion the moment an article is created, more information may be added through further research.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
2	A2	Applies to articles not written in English that has the same content with an article in another language. This article should be tagged Not Emgligh and should be listed in pages needing translation to English.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
3	A3	No content: This refers to articles having no content on the subject but rather only consisting only external links, categories, templates tags, images etc. It also include articles with entirely framework of Article Wizard and does not include articles having only infoboxes unless it has met another speedy deletion criteria. However, such articles should not be deleted at the first few minutes after creation.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
4	A5
5	A7	No indication of importance: This applies to articles on persons, animals, objects that does not indicate the importance of that subject. This excludes articles about educational institution. This criterion does apply if the claim of significance given is not credible, and any article with a false claim should be attributed to speedy deletion as hoax.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
6	A9	No indication of importance (musical recordings): applies to any article about a musical recording or list of musical recordings where none of the contributing recording artists has an article and that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. It does not apply to other forms of creative media, products, or any other types of articles.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
7	A10	Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic: applies to any newly created article with no relevant page history that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia article, and that does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject, and where the title is not a plausible redirect.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
8	A11	Obviously invented: This applies to articles that are coined, invented, or discovered by the creator of the article or someone whom he/she personally knows and does not indicate the subject's significance. The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify under Wikipedia's notability guidelines.	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
9	R2	Cross-namespace redirects: This applies to redirects from any mainspace to another mainspace except Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces, and to broken redirects that would qualify for this criterion if they were fixed (e.g., redirects to articles that have been draftified).	Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

---

3. Please read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diffs and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i:Nokia DX 220 Compact

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer ii:DEAC European Data Center Operator https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=DEAC_European_Data_Center_Operator&action=history

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iii:Tarla https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tarla&diff=prev&oldid=1157671936

N - see here. The article just states the info of the film. Cassiopeia talk 02:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iv:Rob Strasser https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Rob_Strasser&diff=prev&oldid=1157672110

N - see comment here. Cassiopeia talk 02:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer v:Baitush Sharaf Adarsha Kamil Madrasah https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Baitush_Sharaf_Adarsha_Kamil_Madrasah&diff=prev&oldid=1157673856

N - see comment here. Cassiopeia talk 02:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer vi: Ray R. Harris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_R._Harris

Answer vii: Unimoni india

Answer viii: Coozera https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coozera

---

Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and answer the questions below.

3. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?

Answer: We nominate an article for Wp:G12 if content of an article violates copyright - if the content is copied directly without the consent of the copyright holder, and that content doesn't belong the the public domain or compatible licenses. We WP:REVDEL an article if part of the content contain information that violates copyright, we there remove that part.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 10:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

4. What constitute copyright infringement/violation.

Answer: Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) or inserting information or close paraphrasing is a copyright violation.

Y if the content is a brief quotation, source (inline citation) is need to be provided by the editor on the page. Cassiopeia talk 10:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

5. Why some of the texts found in an article are identical as per its sources and yet they are not considered copyright violation? Please provide three examples.

Answer i: Titles of people or publications; eg. Bola Tinubu, The Holy Bible

Y. another example is - the content is licensed for commercial reuse and is properly attributed. Cassiopeia talk 10:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Answer ii: Text or illustrations from the public domain; eg. informattion from the US government

Y. Cassiopeia talk 10:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Answer iii: Brief quotations and information from other Wikipedia pages or projects

Y. Cassiopeia talk 10:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

6. Why copyright violation needs to be stamped out from Wikipedia and who determined when a violation is lawfully taking place?

Answer: The last thing we (Wikipedia) want is a copyright problem, that is why administrators and other users (with or without extended rights) should mercilessly sort out copyright violation of any kind and delete them immediately

N. You didnt state the reasons in your answer. Copyright infringement violation entails legal implications. Wikipedia talk violation of copyvio "very seriously". Cassiopeia talk 10:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

---

7. Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.

Answer i: Bandini s.p. 1000

N. see CSD closing here. Cassiopeia talk 02:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer ii: Gaudencio Antonino https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Gaudencio_Antonino&diff=prev&oldid=1157716142

N. See comment here. Cassiopeia talk 02:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iii: 4x4 beach volleyball at the 2023 World Beach Games

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=4x4_beach_volleyball_at_the_2023_World_Beach_Games&diff=prev&oldid=1157718314

N. See here. Cassiopeia talk 02:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iv: Rick Meehan

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer v: TC Freisenbruch https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=TC_Freisenbruch&diff=prev&oldid=1157717953

N - see comment here. Cassiopeia talk 02:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer vi: Diablo (upcoming film) Draft:Diablo (upcoming film)

Answer vii: Swati P. Shah https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swati_P._Shah

Answer viii:

---

8. Pls provide 5 successful CSD in any criteria except WP:G11, WP:G12 and WP:G13 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i: Anitha Sampath

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer ii: Hittman (band) https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hittman_(band)&diff=prev&oldid=1169934050

N. - see the AfD closing here. Cassiopeia talk 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iii: Atharv Singh

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iv: Prof. Nirmal Chandra Roy

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer v: Jim Huggins https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jim_Huggins&diff=prev&oldid=1170264596

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

---

9. Pls read WP:R2 and WP:NPPDRAFT. Please explain when to a new page (NPP article) can be nominated for CSD R2 and what should be considered when doing such move?

Answer: A page can be nominated for CSD R2 (Cross-namespace redirects) if the page redirected to draft space if the article does not meet the requirement to stand-alone article on Wikipedia namespace, and what to consider during such a move include: i. the topic has some potential merit, and ii. the article does not meet the required standard, and iii. there is no evidence of active improvement (at least one hour since the last constructive edit), and iv. the article does not contain copyright violations or v. when the author clearly has a conflict of interest

N A new page can be nominated for speedy deletion under R2 if it provides a redirect from the mainspace to a different namespace, except (including Category:, Help: Template:, Portal:). The reason this criterion exists is to separate the mainspace, which is visible to the public, from various behind the scenes operations of Wikipedia. One other thing that should be considered is whether the redirect is to a article that has been moved to the draft space. In that case, the redirect does not qualify for R2. Also, R2 to draft space - We move articles to the draftspace to allow articles to be developed especially potential but unsourced WP:BLP article. Use R2 sparingly as some admins do not like pages to be move to draft page even WP:NPPDRAFT states the move is a safe place for editor to adding necessary sources, they would deems the if the articles are not improved or edit in 6 months, it will be G13. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

---

10. Pls read and A1-A11 and R2 at WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY").Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i CSD A7: Herzl Kabilio https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Herzl_Kabilio&diff=prev&oldid=1158632123

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer ii CSD A7: Craxy https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Craxy&diff=prev&oldid=1158632889

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iii CSD R2: Richy Mitch and the Coal Miners

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer iv CSD R2: Vauhti kiihtyy https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Vauhti_kiihtyy&diff=prev&oldid=1158980723

N. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer v any criteria: ChoCo (group)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Copyright violation and paid editors

Pls read WP:COI and WP:PAID and answer the following question

11. How do we spot a COI/PAID editor?

Answer: A COI/PAID editor can be spotted especially when a personal relationship exists between an editor and the subject or company/organization on Wikipedia. These relationships may be family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. A person may have COI if he/she has personal interest in the subject. While Paid editors include editing Wikipedia in exchange for money. When large amounts of text are added to an article on behalf of the article subject, the article has, in effect, been ghostwritten by the subject without the readers' knowledge. Responding volunteers should therefore carefully check the proposed text and sources. Look carefully at the following:

• Look for unnecessary detail that may have been added to overwhelm something negative.
• Make sure nothing important is missing. Responding editors should do their own search for independent sources. Do not rely on the sources offered by the paid editor.
• Look for non-neutral language and unsourced or poorly sourced content.
• Be cautious about accepting content based on self-published sources such as a personal website, or primary sources such as a company website or press release.
• If the paid text is added to the article, the edit summary should include full attribution; for example: "Text inserted on behalf of paid editor User:X; copied from Draft:Paid draft." See WP:COIATTRIBUTE below.

Editors who have a general conflict of interest may make unambiguously uncontroversial edits (but see WP:FINANCIALCOI). They may:

1. remove spam and unambiguous vandalism,
2. remove unambiguous violations of the biography of living persons policy,
3. fix spelling, grammatical, or markup errors,
4. repair broken links,
5. remove their own COI edits, and
6. add independent reliable sources when another editor has requested them, although it is better to supply them on the talk page for others to add.

Y. See more on Note section below at the communication. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

12. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a COI editor?

Answer: If you notice COI, you should; 1. Advocacy, noticeboards: If a user's edits lead you to believe that they might have a COI (that is, if they have an "apparent COI"), and there has been no COI disclosure, consider first whether the issue may be simple advocacy. 2. Reporting to the conflict of interest noticeboard 3. Avoid outing: which include avoiding revealing the identity of the editor 4. Accounts that appear to be single-purpose, existing for the sole or primary purpose of promotion or denigration of a person, company, product, service, website, organization, etc., and whose postings are in apparent violation of this guideline, should be made aware of this guideline and warned not to continue their problematic editing. If the same pattern of editing continues after the warning, the account may be blocked.

Y. Note: COI editor needs to disclosed their COI on the article talk page and their user page. We "must" move a COI editor page from new page feed to draft space no matter how many years/edits/page created by the COI editor so the article would be first check by WP:Article for Creation (AfC) reviewer and then by New Page (NPP) reviewer/patroller. If a reviewer has both AfC and NPP reviewer right, then once the article (any article) is accepted in draft space will be automatically bypass New Page review and place in main space. Google will index the page (a few hours to a few days - Wikipedia has no control of when it will be indexed) once the article is accepted by a NPP reveiwer. Cassiopeia talk 03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

13. Please read WP:PAID. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a paid editor?

Answer: If an undisclosed paid editor is noticed, the patroller should report it to the Administrators' Noticeboard (Incidents) or to the Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest Noticeboard if it does not involve revealing the private information of an editor. You can also email paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org with why you believe an editor is engaged in paid editing and there is private information and you can also contact member of the CheckUser team directly.

---

Uncle Bash007 See assignment 4 above. Assignment 4 and 5 are the hardest assignment of the program so please take your time to answer the questions. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 03:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, pls how can I install this MYCSD file??

Uncle Bash007 You can find it at here. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 09:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Cassiopeia, Good day, pls I need explanation on how to install the CSD file. I don't know how to save it.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello @sir, I still need help on how to install it. I asked around but nobody seems to know, pls..Uncle Bash007 (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 as per link above, you can just click "install" and it will let you to your "common.js" page all you need is to just that is a line "importScript( 'User:Music1201/MyCSD.js' ); // Backlink: User:Music1201/MyCSD.js" on it and click save. If you can get it done, then go to your User:YOUR USER NAME HERE/common.js page and add the above bold text and click save. Let me know if you still have any issue to install the page. Cassiopeia talk 04:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, but I still don't get i @sir..Uncle Bash007 (talk) 10:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Can you see the "install" on the top of page? if so click on it and it will lead you to your user common.js page then just click save. Let me know if you need any help. If you still cant get it done then, I will refer you to another techntical editor to help you. Cassiopeia talk 01:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, sir, I was able to install them all..Y I wasn't able to see install on the top page because I didn't tick/permit Install scripts without having to manually edit JavaScript files from my preferences - gadgets.. sorry for trouble and thanks.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Good to know you get it installed. Cassiopeia talk 09:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello Cassiopeia, good day.. I have a question pls, how can I identify an article that was previously deleted (A10) since I cannot access the previously deleted articles

Uncle Bash007 you can type the article name on here and if the article has been deleted, it will show on the log. Hope this help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 16:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 If you have finished the assignment, then let me now. Cassiopeia talk 19:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, yes I am through. I have finished answering the questions.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Hi, I could not find you CSD log. Pls read the info at the top of this assignment and get your CSD log set up for I need to check a few things to review some of your answer. If you have installed it as you had said, then pls provide me the link. pls ping me. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Question, Pls provide hist diff, links for questions 3, 7, 10. Ping when you have done. Cassiopeia talk 10:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Cassiopeia, I have successfully installed all the three script but I don't know why my CSD log is empty. I have also provided links of his diffs but some of the pages are already deleted after I tagged them for speedy del

Uncle Bash007 It is very hard for me to check when your CSD is empty. I am not sure you have installed it correctly. If you do, then after you have installed the CSD script, any of your CSD nomination will be logged in your CSD page. You might want to go to the WP:TH and ask if any technical person/editor could check for you if you have installed the CSD scrip correctly or if they can give you some instruction. TH technical editors are very helpful. Let me know of your finding... Cassiopeia talk 10:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Alright Sir.. I will do such right away.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello Sir, I have reached out to them and I was instructed to install Twinkle from my preference, and I did. Pls check and confirm if it's ok.. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Sir, check the assignment and see.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 See comments and pls provide addition answers as for Q7 and Q8. Pls read the "NOTE" section below and re-read guidelines of Q7 and Q8. Pls note that CSD and COPYVIO identification correctly is extremely important as the you need to get them correct at least 90% correct to graduate from NPPS. When you have finished, pls let me know. Also pls see the next assignment for you.03:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Sir, thank you for taking time to review my assignment. Best regardsUncle Bash007 (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Notes

G11 (promo) - What constitute a G11? At times it is hard to define. Although if a article is bluntly promote or advertise about the subject then it is a G11. Sometimes, the it is a little subtle and that would be a judgement call. As a rule of thumb, if article about an entertainers (actor/singer/DJ/artist and etc) in dept of how hard they work, how motivated they are, using all the puffery/flowery languages and especially the subject does not meet notability guidelines. For a corporation, we would see they list down all they product/services, their directors/key person in the company, they mission, their client, they are the influencer in their industrial, all the words/phrased to enhance/market the company and no substantial info that is supported by independent reliable sources.

G12 (copyvio) -

Copyright violation addresses the use of original expression without permission of the holder which is a violation of laws even the credit is given to the source. For articles, the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.

A “fact” is not considered an original work of authorship; but how the ways facts are recorded where the style of the writing, choice and/or arrangement of words are copyrightable. An infringement of copyright is committed when a person uses the “exact words /almost exact words in a consecutive manner” of the author/holder. To note, as a guideline, a few words copies from the original works and an idea of expression such as "weather the storm", 'crossing the Rubicon" "as dead as a doornail" and etc. proper nouns, document/event/treaty/person/title/ names are generally acceptable and so is a direct quote of speech. However, any longer phrases which would be expression in a number of ways are copyright protected. To use one of two short sentences on a large article generally is ok but it will considered infringement if the edit entry is consists of big percentage of the original work and yet for some (such as newspaper/press/journalism that takes their work very seriously - anything more than 4 exact consecutively words would considered copyvio). To avoid copyright infringement, one needs uses his/her own words to convey the source’s information. Paraphrasing could minimize the the copyright violation; however, "threshold" ultimately, court judgement would determined the if copyright violation has been made.

Copyvio for texts or images shared the same notion that it is not a copyvio if the verbatim texts or images are taken from free licence and Public domain sites/specific page/image. Always check the "original source" even if in WikiCommon the editor who upload the image claim taken from a PD site, we need to check the link provided and if the site indicate the image taken from another source, then we check the source. For texts, we need to check the sites if it is a PD, sometimes the disclaimer of PD is not on the page, but on the home page or "about" page or FAQ page. Secondly, for older article (no in NPP Feed), any copyvio texts found, we will revdel it as it is almost always it is not the first versions. If a small amount of verbatim texts found in NPP Feed articles, we would revdel them; but large amount of verbatim texts we will tag G12.

Lastly, here are a few examples where the German car maker Audi was sued for copyright breach.

1. Audi infringed copyright violation over Eminem’s song “Lose Yourself” in their commercial advertising. [5]

2. Audi was fined US $ 965,000 over copyright infringement for using 10 words from Brian Andreas’s story of “Angel of Mercy” - [6]

I think I just had a wake-up call, and it was disguised as a car, and it was screaming at me not to get too comfortable and fall asleep and miss my life. (Audi commercial) Some people don’t know that there are angels whose only job is to make sure you don’t get too comfortable & fall asleep & miss your life.(Brian Andreas’ print)

Spot COI / PAID COI editors are permitted to edit Wikipedia and create on the affected articles; however, it is "HIGHLY DISCOURAGE/NOT RECOMMENDED as it is very difficult for the COI editors to write the article/input info into the affected article in [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view}}.

1.Use person pronouns and possessives (I, we, my, our) 2.Multiple references to company, financial listings, staff lists, interviews, own publication, press release, blog and with clean references 3.Well written prose 'too perfect to be true' and only with single/2 edits 4.Editors have created multiple company related articles 5.Editors disclosed their COI/PAID in their userpage (not tag with COI disclose), or disclosure when they ask question in WP:Teahouse, WP:Help Desk, WP:AFCHD or receivers' talk pages.

A7/A9/A11 - Credible claim of significance - If the subject content do have such claim, then it is not a A7 even the article at the present stage of the article is not notable. Choose other method. (1) after a WP:BEFORE and found no independent reliable sources to support the notability requirements, then nominated for WP:AFD, or R2 to draft space if no sources are provided (do R2 sparingly). If it is a {[WP:BLP]] without source, then WP:BLPPROD or R2. - see Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance

Hope the above help. Note the above does not substitute the Wikipedia links and reading material I provided.

---

Tagging

In this assignment we look at tagging pages for problems. There any many tags available in Wikipedia and we will look at some of them here.

• Please enable Wikipedia:HotCat in your "Wikipedia references" - see How to enable/disable HotCat. The tool lists and proposes existing categories for auto-completion.
• Pls download StubSorter user script. The script is for adding/removing stub tags.
• Pls download Rater user script. The scripts provides a dialog interface to add, remove, or modify WikiProject banners, including class and importance assessment. Accessible from either the page itself or its talk page. after saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.
• Please enable User:Galobtter/Shortdesc helper gadget for editing, adding, and importing short descriptions.

Tagging in the article

Please read WP:TAGGING and answer the questions below. Please provide explanation in your own words and provide hist diff when applicable.

1. Why do we place tags on the article?

Answer: We place tags to a problematic article in order that to ask other editors to improve the article that we can not or will not improve ourselves.

Y I think you meant "could not improve". Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

2. What does "drive by tagging" mean?

Answer: is adding tags for non-obvious or perceived problems—without identifying the problem well enough for it to be easily fixed—is frequently referred to as "drive-by tagging"; especially when done by editors who are not involved in the article development.

Y.It does not matter who tag but drive by tagging is adding tags for non-obvious issues. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

3. List down 8 common tagging should be avoided in an article?

Answer: i. Avoid vague tagging that will result in further confusion ii. Avoid too many tagging in one article: If an article has many problems, tag only the highest priority issues. iii. Avoid wrong tagging. Don't when a tag does not explain the problem you want to tag or when no tag exist for that specific problem. iv. unhelpful tags: don't put tags that will not help in improving the article. v. redundant tags: Avoid adding two tags to the same article, section or passage that essentially mean the same thing, in a whole. vi. Avoid adding tags to non-obvious problems without discussion vii. Don't tag an article if you can easily and confidently fix the problem. viii. Don't do "drive-by" tagging.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

4. When it is appropriate to remove the tags?

Answer: When the purported problem has being solved; or when an editor sees tag that could not see the purported problem with the article and does not see any detailed complaint on the talk page may remove the tag

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

5. Tag 10 articles from Special:Newpagesfeed where appropriate tags are needed and provide associate personal message to creator using page curator tool.

(pls provide links)

i. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dnipropetrovsk_Art_Museum&dtrepliedto=new%7CTalk%3ADnipropetrovsk_Art_Museum - audio request tag for the article title

N - need tagging in the article page and not request on the talk page. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalist_Congress_Party_(Sharadchandra_Pawar) - multiple issues tag

Y - pls next time provide hist diff - like this [7]

iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuraddin_Novruzov - multiple issues - citations

N - pls provide hist diff - see here/like this [8]. The article already have links and as per content there are citation. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIDDY_(Vietnamese_rapper) - multiple issues, no citations

article deleted. - see here. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Lombe - multiple issues

Y. Pls provide hist link next time - see [9]

vi. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Substance_3D - advert

no taggings. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Borisoglebskaya - uncategorised, lacks sufficient citations

Y. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroflexibility - written like an essay, no lead, no inline citations..

article deleted - see here. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosanna_Rocci - uncategorised, lacks sufficient citations

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [10]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

x. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_C._James - article too short

N The lead lenght is ok and they are sections in the article. However, it lack body text. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [11]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

6. Read Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types and use StubSorter user script. Tag 10 sub class article correctly from Special:Newpagesfeed. (pls provide links)

i. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milaor_Church - Philiphines building structure stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [12]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Robson - Australian-painter stub

Page does not exist. - see [13]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Fardell_(MP) - UKMP stub

No stub sort by you. - see article hist log. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiral_Radadiya - Indian-actor stub

Article deleted - see [14]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Lombe - DrCongo-bio stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [15]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vi. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismael_Ortega_(footballer) _ Macau footy bio stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [16]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moon_Upside_Down - Australian radio show stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [17]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravensburg–Weingarten–Baienfurt_tram_line - German rail transport stub

Y - Pls provide hist diff next time - [18]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_C._James - Australian writer stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [19]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

x. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_Quality_Language - medical related stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [20]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Categorization

7. Please read Wikipedia:Categorization and assign 10 articles from Special:Newpagesfeed with one or more useful categories. You can check similar articles for potentially relevant

categories. (pls provide links)

i. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosanna_Rocci - Italian people, Italian singers..

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [21]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Borisoglebskaya - Ukrainian actors

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [22]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Anthony_Cornelius_Weber - politicians from Hamburgh

iv. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firoz_Shah%27s_invasion_of_Orissa - Indian History

Y Guess you unable to category the article. Pls provide hist diff next time - see - [23]. Since the article has been categorized "Military expeditions and Eastern Gang dynasty". Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRENDS_Research_%26_Advisory - Research institute in the UAE

Article deleted - see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRENDS_Research_%26_Advisory}. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vi. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_christian_communions_by_membership - Christian communities

Article deleted - see [24]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Goldfarb - Canadian actresses

Article moved to draft space - see [25]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airlines_of_Northern_Australia - Australian airliners

Article deleted - see [26]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grubnik_Volodimir - Ukrainian medical doctors [27]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Article moved to draft space - see [28]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

x. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIDDY_(Vietnamese_rapper) - Vietnamese musician

Article deleted - see [29]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Sorting

8. Please read Wikipedia:WikiProject and Wikipedia:Content assessment and tag 10 articles from Special:Newpagesfeed with appropriate WikiProject and class types on the articles' talk pages. Please use Rater user script. (pls provide links)

i. Answer: Magnetic Mountain - WikiProject Mountains - C-class

{{semi tick}} - Also Russia - pls provide hist diff next time [30]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Mérat#Biography - French Biography - Start

No wikiproject sort by you - see [Talk:Albert Mérat: Revision history]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_Artillery_of_the_Imperial_Guard - WikiProject Military History - B-class

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see - [31]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikołaj_Skrzetuski - WikiProject Poland - B-Class

No wikiproject sort by you - see [Mikołaj Skrzetuski: Revision history]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: Warszawskiego Towarzystwa Łyżwiarskiego - WikiProject Poland - Start

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [32]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vi. Answer: IP GP Caladium F.C. - Indonesia, Footbal - Stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [33]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: Dan Jackson (American football) - WikiProject American football - start

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - see [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADan_Jackson_%28American_football%29&diff=1218358299&oldid=1218012734. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: 2023–24 PFF National Challenge Cup - WikiProject Pakistan - C-Class

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [34]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: Mujahid Shah's Vijayanagara campaigns - WikiProject India - B-class

Y. Most of your class tag is too high. Majority should be one class down. I changed this one from B to Start. Pls provide hist diff next time - [35]. Cassiopeia talk

x. Answer: Ilija Đurović - WikiProject Montenegro - Stub

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - Y. Most of your class tag is too high. Majority should be one class down. I changed this one from B to Start. Pls provide hist diff next time - title=Talk%3AIlija_%C4%90urovi%C4%87&diff=1218360347&oldid=1218191781. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Short description

9. short description suitable to allow a reader to identify which search result is most likely to suit their needs. All mainspace pages should have a description of what they are preferably limit to about 40 characters, but function is important. Please read Wikipedia:Short description and Wikipedia:WikiProject Short descriptions and provide 10 short descriptions in 10 different articles from Special:Newpagesfeed. Please enable User:Galobtter/Shortdesc helper prior making the edit. (pls provide links)

i. Answer:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_R._Harris - An American Entrepreneur

Article deleted - see [36]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Medea_of_Euripides_(radio_play) - 1954 Australian radio play by Ray Mathew

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [37]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [38]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Broken_Melody_(novel) - Australian novel by F. J. Thwaites iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [39]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_March_2024_Odesa_strike - Russia missile attack in Odesa, Ukraine iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [40]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vi. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonel_Ateba - Cameroonian professional footballer iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [41]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isnad-cum-matn_analysis - Study of the development of hadith iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [42]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstantin_Voskoboinik - Anti-communist political figure in the Soviet Union iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [43]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toody_Cole - American musical artist iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [44]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

x. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iskandarnameh_of_Nizami - Poetry by Persian poet Nizami Ganjavi iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communism_in_China - Chinese anti-communism

Y. Pls provide hist diff next time - [45]. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

---

Uncle Bash007 See assignment 6 above. Cassiopeia talk 03:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Reviewed. See the comments above. Cassiopeia talk 03:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Communication and editor interactions

Wikipedia project is a collaboration of many editors, some are experienced and some are new to the Project ad Wikipedia values all constructive editors' contributions alike. Communication in a civil, respectful manner is a vital part in Wikipedia, and it should be welcomed rather than discouraged especially to new editors who are not familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and policies for most new editors find it is a steep learning curve during the first few months of editing articles or creating articles in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL, Wikipedia:Etiquette, and welcome template and answer the following questions. Do provide links and hist diff where appropriate.

Communication

1. How do we deal with a bad faith registered user and how do we deal with a bad faith IP editor?

Answer: Even if bad faith is evident do not act uncivilly yourself, or attack others or act aggressively. call the attention of of administrators and experienced editors will intervene and rule out if their is breach of policies by the other user.

However, a registered user and an IP address are all the same. Their comments, edits are also counted, as well as penalties such as blocks and bans.

Y. We treat both IP and registered user the same way, except for new editors who at times might not know the Wikipedia guidelines and act on good fait even thought the edit(s) is not helpful, such as wrong table format, bold when it should not, wrong inline citation and etc., we would send them a civil message and let them know the right way to edit and the guidelines. If the edit(s) is a bad edit such as vandalism, personal attack, etc. then we place warning message on their talk page and if edit of such continuing then we report them.

2. What can we do to welcome and help the newcomers.? (List down 10 different ways/scenario)

i. Answer: We can do so, by leaving a welcome note for the new user on his/her talk page, welcoming him with good tone and introducing himher to the basic Wikipedia editing guidelines.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: Encourage them to be bold. Motivate them to edit any page (positively) where they feel there is correction or more information to be added.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: In a situation where new comer violated Wikipedia policies unknowingly, assume good faith, point out the mistake clearly and explain kindly ways to do it correctly and encourage them to avoid same mistake in the future

Y. It is a serious vandalism edit then we will warn them on their talk page. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: Even if a new user repeatedly make the same mistake, act in good faith and tell them about the penalties of violating Wikipedia guidelines deliberately

v. Answer: Don't instantly remove or revert their contribution (improve it, where it can be improved) or guide them on how to correct the mistake, or otherwise edit and leave an explanatory note on their talk page

Y. Remove if it is vandalism edit and warn them on their talk page. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

vi. Answer: Avoid intensifiers in commentary (for example, exclamation points and words such as terrible, dumb, stupid, bad, poor, toxic, etc.) when referring to new comers

Y. Always comment on the edits and not the editor as the above examples are considered WP:Personal attack which is a serious Wikipedia violation for an editor will be blocked from editing if the editor personal attack other editor many times. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: Listen actively to the new comers' responses and be willing to act justly

Y. Always be WP:CIVIL in communication. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: Avoid excessive Wikipedia jargon. When linking to policies or guidelines, do so in whole phrases, not wiki shorthand.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: Avoid deleting newly created articles, as inexperienced authors might still be working on them or trying to figure something out.

Y. If an article violate the WP:CSD criteria then we can tag for CSD deletion. If not we can wait for 1-2 hours and see if the article meet PROPS or AfD. If the article does not meet CSD PROS and AfD, then review the article and help on adding categories, wiki link, shor description, talk page project and article class inf and etc and tag anything for other editor to help if needed - (note: that is how we review an article). Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

x. Answer: Assume good faith when dealing with new comers

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

3. In you own words, provide 10 ways to avoid biting the newcomers.

i. Answer: Remember that it's okay to make mistakes—we're all only human.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: Improve, don't remove. If something doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, try to fix the problem rather than just remove what's broken.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: Always moderate your approach and wording

Y. Always civil and polite - see WP:CIVIL. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: Nothing drives away new comers faster than hostility. Therefore show some hospitality and make them feel appreciated.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: Strive to respond in a measured manner. Do not over react.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

vi. Answer: Take responsibility for resolving conflicts in case affecting new comers.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

vii. Answer: Be gracious. Show some appreciation for the edits they did correctly y leaving a thank you note or issuing barn stars when necessary

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

viii. Answer: Always listen to new comers attentively. They may not know the appropriate way to present complains. Guide them and help them in solving problems

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ix. Answer: Avoid deleting newly created articles instantly (unless it contains copyright problems or vandalism). Shift articles to draft spaces and guide them on how to develop such articles

x. Answer: Don't fill pages with maintenance template. This may cause new comers to feel unwelcome

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

4. Place 5 different welcome templates on 5 different newcomers. (Pls provide user talk page links)

i. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMiStolz#Welcome!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADingliproperty#

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMohism_II#Welcome!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEvaChanWS#Welcome!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFREAKY%21ALIEN

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

5. List 5 uncivil behaviors and explain how you would duel with them.

i. Answer: Rudeness - consider whether you and the other editor may simply have misunderstood each other. Clarify, and ask for clarification. Apologise if you wronged someone or request apology or otherwise request to change the wording or strike out.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: Insults - Consider the possibility that something you said or did wrongly provoked a defensive, irritated or fed-up response. Be prepared to apologise for anything which you could/should have done better.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: Personal attack - Even if you're offended, be as calm and reasonable as possible in your response. Until there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that the offense was unintended. Be ready to apologise. Avoid editing when you are in a bad mood.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: Harassment - Be professional. Just because we are online and unpaid does not mean we can behave badly to each other. Be respectful and kind to others and respect differences.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: Posting personal information - Avoid name-calling. Someone may prefer to stay anonymous but calling his name may cause problem. As such quickly revert the edit and call attention of an oversighter to delete the edits parmanently

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

A token of appreciation

We reward Wikipedia editors for their hard work and due diligence by awarding them barnstars as a token of appreciation, encouragement and make its recipient feel good of their contributions. The choice of banstar given should be fair and appropriate, which will help prevent over-use. There are many different type of banstars, kindly read Wikipedia:Barnstars, Wikipedia:Personal user awards

5. Give 5 different banstars to 5 different editor and do provide relevant text as to why you are awarding them. (Pls provide links)

i. Answer: This editor new editor has shown diligence, patience and commitment in creating new articles despite the tags for deletions, warnings, moves to draft spaces etc. A barnstar of diligence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Samchristie05#A_barnstar_for_you!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

ii. Answer: This new user response to criticism with open mind, respect and good vibes. A barnstar of good humor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Newhaven_lad#A_barnstar_for_you!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iii. Answer: This experienced editor has once intervened in a conflict of interest discussion where she helped resolve the problem. A barnstar of civility for her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Clayoquot#A_barnstar_for_you!_3

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

iv. Answer: Admin's Barnstar for this administrator for his punctual responses to questions from inexperienced editors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hoary#A_barnstar_for_you!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

v. Answer: A random act of kindness barnstar for this user because he made a comment on my talk page that lightens my day (we don't know each other before) and I believe it's his habit around. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GBR1961#A_barnstar_for_you!

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

---

Uncle Bash007 See assignment 7 above. This is the last assignment of the program. Few more notes/info sections (no questions to answer) will be provided after you have completed assignment 7 prior the final exam. You are getting very close to the end of the program. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 03:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, I want to know if there is specific tool or page where I can access newly registered users for Question 7. And I will like to know if I can issue the barn star in any Language Wiki apart from English Wikipedia. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007 Pls send message to me here (the communication section) anything regarding the assignment and I will reply to you at the same place. There is no Q7, so pls let me know again which question you were referring to. All Wikipedia sister sites (different languagues) operate independently from each other and they have slightly different guidelines and reinforcement of the rules. So pls provide info/answer only pertaining to English Wikipedia. You can find new registered users HERE and you can also find new users who are interested in editing in WP:TEAHOUSE which is more useful to send them welcome messages since they have intention to learn more about editing English Wikipedia. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 00:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

{{u|Cassiopeia talk morning, ok. I mean assignment 7, Q5. Thank you for the feed back.

@Uncle Bash007: Uncle Bash007. When you ping an editor, you need to use two open curly brackets then ping then pipe then editor name then 2 close curly brackets - (see example here where I ping you). For Assignment 7, Q5 - you need to give banstar to 5 different editors in English Wikipedia. Make sure you state the provide relevant text as to why you are awarding them the banstar. Cassiopeia talk 08:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Cassiopeia, I am through answering the questions. Kindly assess and comment. Thank you. Best regards

@Cassiopeia: I am through answering the questions.

@Uncle Bash007: Reviewed. See comments above. Cassiopeia talk 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Tools and help

#	Tools	For / Functions
1	Twinkle	Wikipedia gadget to assist common maintenance tasks
2	Hotcat	Wikipedia gadget to propose existing categories for auto-completion
3	Resource Request	Wikipedia help desk to locate content of printed books or form paywall sites
4	Google translate	Translation
5	Citation Tool for Google Books	Citation tool for Google books
6	Reverse Image Search	Reverse image serach
7	User:Uncle Bash007/CSD log	Your Criteria for speedy deletion log]
8	Bash007&max=&startdate=&altname= This is your AfD log	Your Article for Deletion log
9	Earwig's Copyvio Detector via web Earwig Copyvio Detector script	Copyvio detector tool
10	CV-revdel	Delete copyrighted content request
11	StubSorter user script.	Adding/removing stub tags
12	Rater user script	Adding, removing, or modifying WikiProject banners, including class and importance assessment
13	StubSorter user script	Adding stub class sorter
14	Shortdesc helper script	Wikipedia gadget - Adding short description in the article
15	Special:NewPagesFeed	Search new articles in Wikipedia
16	Copyvio Check	Displays the % of copyvio in a separate section of the info menu of the NPP toolset.
17	Superlinks	Quickly view pages and information related to the page they are currently viewing or editing without the need to navigate away form current page
18	NPP flowchart	NPP flowchart

---

Uncle Bash007, No home works for Assignment 8 - Just make sure you have all the tools which I have provided to you so far and know how to use them and when to use them. Cassiopeia talk

---

Putting all together -reviewing articles

• Please install COPYVIO check script. This is a script which displays the % of copyvio in a separate section of the info menu of the NPP toolset. After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.

• Please install Superlinks script. This script allows users to quickly view pages and information related to the page they are currently viewing or editing without the need to navigate away from the page or open large numbers of new tabs. After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.

• Bookmark NPP flowchart in your devices.

• Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

Reviewing articles

Please refer to NPP flowchart and read all the reading material provide from Assignment and tools 1-8 and answer the questions below. Please pick 10 articles from the new pages or draft pages from Special:NewPagesFeed and follow the NPP flowchart and provide the appropriate answer below (pls place N/A if not applicable). Pick articles that have 3-4 sources for the exercises below.

0. Example

1. Article (pls provide link) = Assignment 2 - Sources Q 8 and 9 Q 8 - David Howell Petraeus
2. Article titles (need to change if so state the change) = OK
3. Images copyright = US free image
4. NPOV (if not then state why) =yes
5. COI / PAID (if yes then provide explanation)= no indication
6. COPYVIO (if yes then provide source (URL) = not
7. Article Class = Stub class
8. Short Description = U.S. Army general
9. Categories (3-5) = 1952 births  ; Living people ; Commandants of the United States Army Command
10. Review (Review/AfD/PROD/BLPPROD/R2) = Reviewed
11. Reason (for 10) = = meet GNG and Military history/Notability guide#2
12. WikiProject = Biography, Military history, Espionage, New York (state), Iraq, Afghanistan
13. Sources (see below)

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/	The source is major newspaper	The source is reputable published source	The source discusses the subject directly and in detail	✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch	CNN is independent of the government.	CNN is generally considered reliable.	CNN shows him taking the oath.	✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893	Independent of the government	Is very opinionated	Addresses the topic in detail	✘ No
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012	The subject isn't connected to the maker of the family tree.	Can't be verified.	Not sure	✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005	Not connected to the subject.	The source is considered reliable.	Talks about the subject in detail.	✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html	The subject is talking to the author.	It comes from a reputable news source.	He is the subject of the interview.	✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html	The author is not directly connected with the subject.	The source is a news source that has a reputation of being reliable.	The article talks about him in detail.	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

---

1.

1. Article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letitia_H._Verdin) = - Letitia_H._Verdin

1. Article titles (title may need to be changed) = Most of the sources from the article refer the subject as Letitia Verdin with some fewer with Letitia H. Verdin.
2. Images copyright = No image
3. NPOV = yes
4. COI / PAID = No indication
5. COPYVIO = No
6. Article Class =
7. Short Descr = American judge
8. Categories = Living people; 20th-century American lawyers; 21st-century American judges
9. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = Reviewed
10. Reason (for 10) = meet GNG and WP:JUDGE
11. WikiProject = WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Law,
12. Sources = (1-4)

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://wgog.com/a-seneca-daughter-climbs-the-judicial-ladder/	WGOG is an independent radio station in South Carolina, United States and is not connected to the subject	The source is a news station that has a long standing record in the region	The source does not identify the subject in detail, it rather states a headline on a specific issue.	✘ No
https://www.newspapers.com/article/anderson-independent-mail-seneca-letitia/148767011/	The source ancestry.com is independent of the subject	Ancestry.com hosts user-generated content, which is unreliable.	The source provided a trivial mention of the subject	✘ No
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-greenville-news-seneca-high-school-1/148767049/	The source ancestry.com is independent of the subject	Ancestry.com hosts user-generated content, which is unreliable.	The source provided a trivial mention of the subject	✘ No
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-greenville-news-marriage-of-hamilton/148382059/	The source ancestry.com is independent of the subject	Ancestry.com is generally agreed as unreliable	it provided a trivial mention of the subject on one occation "wedding".	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

2.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsilin_Church
2. Article titles = ok
3. Images copyright = CC BY-SA 4.0 - ok
4. NPOV = yes
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = no
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr = Church in Azerbaijan
9. Categories = (3) 1866 establishments, Former Armenian Apostolic churches , 19th-century Eastern Orthodox church buildings
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = yes
11. Reason (for 10) = met GNG, WP:NPLACE
12. WikiProject = Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion,
13. Sources = (2-5)

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20120518052654/http://www.raa.am/Nizh/NIZH_E_2.htm	Wayback Machine is independent of the subject	The Wayback Machine was interpreted to be violating copyright laws with evidence of many law suit cases	The source talked about the church	✘ No
https://kataloq.gomap.az/az/all-poi/science/school/f169b310d56511e0ad4900226424597d	The source is independent of the subject	Google maps and street maps may be reliable for some purpose	The source did not mention the place directly	✘ No
https://armenianarchitecture.org/public/en/monuments/311	The source is a national archive	It is presumed to be reliable	it provided information (pictures) of the place	✔ Yes
https://cavid.info/nic-səfərimiz/	the source is an independent source	Javid Agha is Independent researcher, journalist, writer, he is the first translator of Arthur Schopenhauer's book "Eristic Dialectics" into Azerbaijani language. He is a member of the Baku Research Institute and has appeared in Eurasianet, BNE Intellinews, OC Media, France24, Voice of America and other publications (therefore presumed reliable)	the source provide detail information about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

N. IMPORTANT pls note: When we talk about source independent and reliability we are talking about the content and the source (site/media/newspaper and not the journalists). So katalog.gomap is not a reliable source, just because there is a map, that does not make the source reliable same goes witht the caivd.info as the site(source) is not reliable. The armianarchitecture is an org site that is not reliable as the question is that who is checking the content reliability as they are not reputable. Whenever you see site(source) are from org, gov, edu, personal webisite, blog, all social media, private company (such as Microsoft, AT&T, UFC and etc) there are all NOT reliable. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

3.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realty_Building_explosion
2. Article titles = ok
3. Images copyright = no image
4. NPOV = yes
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = no
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr = 2024 fatal building explosion in a downtown area
9. Categories = 2024 in the United States, 2024 in Ohio, 2024 disasters in the United States, Explosions in 2024
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = yes
11. Reason (for 10) = Meet GNG, and WP:EVENTCRIT
12. WikiProject = WikiProject United States, WikiProject Ohio
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://theclio.com/entry/86646	The source theclio.com is independent of the event	The source seem to be a tertiary source like Wikipedia; everyone can edit	The source mentions the event in detail	✘ No
https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/80003150	The source is independent of the buildong or event	The source is reliable	The source covers the information about the subject	✔ Yes
https://apnews.com/article/ohio-explosion-youngstown-bank-5e42d259adeb3fb1d782133a3f2f6e82	`The source is independent of the subject	The Associated Press is a news agency. There is consensus that the Associated Press is generally reliable.	The source mentions detailed information on the incident	✔ Yes
https://www.wfmj.com/story/50877141/how-safe-is-youngstowns-realty-building-can-it-be-salvaged-engineers-begin-investigation-friday	The source wmfj.com is an independent source	The source is reliable as it has garnered higher ratings than it's competitors (quoted from Wikiepedia WFMJ-TV	The source provided information about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y However, https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/80003150 is a gov site that means it is NOT reliable because no one is checking on the site. Cassiopeia talk 00:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

4.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loris_Zarantonello
2. Article titles = ok
3. Images copyright = no image
4. NPOV = ok
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = no indication
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr = Italian rugby union player
9. Categories = 2000 births, Living people, French sportspeople of Italian descent, Italian people of French descen
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = yes
11. Reason (for 10) = pass GNG, WP:SPORTSPERSON
12. WikiProject = WikiProject Rugby union
13. Sources = 1-4

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://castres-olympique.com/joueurs/loris-zarantonello/	The source is the player's club page	the source may be reliable	it mentions information about the subject	✘ No
https://castres-olympique.com/breves/linterview-decalee-de-loris-zarantonello/	The source is the player's club page	the source may be reliable	it mentions information about the subject	✘ No
https://www.ffr.fr/equipe-de-france/haut-niveau-jeune/moins-de-20-ans/joueurs/zarantonello-loris	The source is independent of the subject	The source may be reliable since it is a French nationa sport news	it does not state detailed information about the subject	✘ No
https://all.rugby/player/loris-zarantonello	the source is independent of the subject	the source may be reliable	it mentions the subject detailed information	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y However, even the source is indepdent and reliable, we can not use just the stats to meet the notability requirements as the content needs to talk about the subject in length and in depth and stats alone does not provide that. Cassiopeia talk 00:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

5.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanshvel
2. Article titles = Vanshvel
3. Images copyright = No image
4. NPOV = yes
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = no indication
7. Article Class = start
8. Short Descr = 2013 Indian film
9. Categories = 2013 films, 2010s Marathi-language films, Indian drama films
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = yes
11. Reason (for 10) = met GNG, SNG film as it is reviewed by 2 nationally known critics
12. WikiProject = WikiProject Film
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20240208193948/https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/the-descendents/	The indianexpress.com is independent of the subject	The Indian Express is considered generally reliable under the news organizations guideline.	the source mention the film details	✔ Yes
https://web.archive.org/web/20240610080126/https://divyamarathi.bhaskar.com/news/bol-vanshvel-released-on-18th-october-4391577-pho.html	The source divyamarathi.bhaskar.com is independent of the subject	is an epaper and reliable	The source mentions the subject in details	✔ Yes
https://web.archive.org/web/20240610075320/https://marathi.indiatimes.com/entertainment/movie-reviews/vanshvel-review/moviereview/24357037.cms	the source marathi.indiantimes.com is independent of the subject	the source according to Wikipedia "is one of the largest selling daily Marathi newspapers in the country and part of The Times of India group." therefore presumed reliable	the source covers the subject significantly.	✔ Yes
https://web.archive.org/web/20240610075758/https://www.prahaar.in/new/उत्कृष्ट-साकारलेली-रहस्य/?amp=1	Prahaar.in is independent of the subject	The newspaper is well known nationally	the source mentions the subject in detail	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y. Just to let you know many of the Indian newspapers are not fully reliable but we dont have enough readers to join the discussion to really think it is not reliable instead many sites (source/newspapers from India) would considered not consensus/not determine because practice of good journalism is not widely practice. (nothing against India but that was what the discussion outcomes). That to say, we also find Fox news from US is reliable in everything they public but not for the political articles.(just to let you know). Another note: I would not review article from certain sources which I have no ideas about the source reliability and can find the discussion outcome of the source and I also dont review article that the subject I have no idea of such as advance Physics or Maths with lots of proves and mathematics theory which can launch the rocket to space. I will leave it to other review do have the knowledge of the subject to work on the review of the article. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

6.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendarium_Parisiense#/media/File:Calendarium_Parisiense_(492489)_(cropped).jpg
2. Article titles = Calendarium Parisiense
3. Images copyright = a United States public domain - ok
4. NPOV = yes
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = Violation Unlikely
7. Article Class = start
8. Short Descr = illuminated manuscript
9. Categories = 14th-century illuminated manuscripts, Manuscripts of the National Library of Poland
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = ok
11. Reason (for 10) = meet GNG, WP:WEBCRIT
12. WikiProject = Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland, WikiProject Poland, Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Paris, Wikipedia:WikiProject Libraries
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://polona.pl/item-view/015230ad-b98d-4ef5-a044-db093114148d	the source polona is independent of the subject	the source is reliable because it digitises objects from public domain from the library of Poland	the source provide information about the object	✔ Yes
https://bn.org.pl/en/news/5313-palace-of-the-commonwealth-open-to-visitors.html	National Library of Poland is independent of the subject	the source is reliable because it is a reputable library	the source provide details about the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.bn.org.pl/download/document/1236004326.pdf	National Library of Poland is independent of the subject	the source is reliable because it is a reputable	the source provide details about the subject	✔ Yes
https://bn.org.pl/en/news/5313-palace-of-the-commonwealth-open-to-visitors.html	National Library of Poland is independent of the subject	the source is reliable because it is a reputable	the source provide details about the subject	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

N https://bn.org.pl/en/ is an org news - so it is not reliable. As for chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.bn.org.pl/download/document/1236004326.pdf even thought is an PDF I will take it as reliable as it show the last page is it from a book. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

7.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheila_Link
2. Article titles = Sheila Link
3. Images copyright = No image
4. NPOV =
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = violation unlikely
7. Article Class = start
8. Short Descr = American sportswoman & writer
9. Categories = 2018 deaths, American women writers
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = ok
11. Reason (for 10) = meet GNG, WP:ANYBIO
12. WikiProject = Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers, Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography
13. Sources = (1-3)

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.wral.com/news/national_world/national/image/17470243/	not available	not available	not available	✘ No
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/obituaries/sheila-link-sportswoman-and-firearms-writer-dies-at-94.html	New York Times is independent of the subject	nytimes is generally reliable	the source covers detailed information about the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.nytimes.com/1973/02/11/archives/wood-field-and-stream-hunt-on-tv.html	New York Times is independent of the subject	nytimes is generally reliable	the source covers detailed information about the subject	✔ Yes
				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.bn.org.pl/download/document/1236004326.pdf is a independent and reliable source. Cassiopeia talk 00:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

8.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Provincial_Building
2. Article titles = Bataan Provincial Building
3. Images copyright = CC BY-SA 3.0 - ok
4. NPOV = ok
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = Violation Unlikely
7. Article Class = C-class
8. Short Descr = Government building in Bataan, Philippines
9. Categories = Provincial capitols in the Philippines, Government buildings,

Government buildings completed in 1794

1. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = ok
2. Reason (for 10) = meet GNG,
3. WikiProject = Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture, Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines
4. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://philhistoricsites.nhcp.gov.ph/registry_database/the-provincial-government-building-of-bataan/	The source is not independent of the government.	is presumed reliable	it provided detailed information about the subject.	✘ No
https://1bataan.com/iconic-capitol-building-stays-gov-abet/	the source is not independent of the government	the source may be reliable	the source covers the subject	✘ No
https://www.philstar.com/nation/2019/09/14/1951587/duterte-unveils-p13-billion-bataan-capitol-building	The Philippine Star is independent of the government	the source may be regarded reliable	the source covers the subject	✔ Yes
https://lifestyle.tribune.net.ph/nhcp-celebrates-90-years-gears-up-for-centennial/			the source did not cover the subject efficiently.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y Gov site is considered not reliable and if it talk about the subject which related to the source (gov) then it is not independent. https://1bataan.com/iconic-capitol-building-stays-gov-abet/ is a gov site - see at the bottom of the page - see at the very bottom of the page. Any lifestyle site is not a reliable source. Cassiopeia talk 00:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

9.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_WCW%3F
2. Article titles = Who Killed WCW?
3. Images copyright = no image
4. NPOV = ok
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = Violation Unlikely
7. Article Class = start
8. Short Descr = 2024 American television series
9. Categories = 2020s American documentary television series, 2024 American television series debuts, American English-language television shows, Television series by WWE
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = passed
11. Reason (for 10) = meet GNG, WP:NFO
12. WikiProject = Wikipedia:WikiProject Television, WikiProject Television/American television task force
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/wwe-hall-of-famer-kevin-nash-says-he-was-stoned-for-who-killed-wcw-series/ar-BB1oaYWI	the source is independent of the subject	the source MSNBC is generally accepted reliable	the source covers the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/dwayne-johnson-killed-wcw-documentary-154939081.html	yahoo news is independent of the subject	it is generally reliable	it covers the topic	✔ Yes
https://www.cinemablend.com/wrestling/who-killed-wcw-ric-flair-blistering-diatribe-jim-herd-eric-bischoff-vince-russo	the source is independent of the topic	the source is presumed reliable per discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_188#Cinemablend	the covers the topic in details	✔ Yes
[46]	the source independent of the topic	not reliable generally unreliable	the source covers the topic in details	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

10.

1. Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_Free_Press
2. Article titles = Liverpool Free Press
3. Images copyright = no image
4. NPOV = ok
5. COI / PAID = no indication
6. COPYVIO = Violation Unlikely
7. Article Class = C class
8. Short Descr = Defunct independent newspaper
9. Categories = Newspapers published in Merseyside, Publications established in 1971, Publications disestablished in 1977
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD = ok
11. Reason (for 10) = meet GNG, SNG WP:SIRS
12. WikiProject = Wikipedia:WikiProject Newspapers
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/history/blog/2021/birth-liverpool-free-press/	the source is not directly connected to the topic	the source is presumed reliable	the source covers the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.livpost.co.uk/p/what-happened-to-five-journalists		The post is generslly unreliable	the source covers the subject significantly	✘ No
https://www.freepressarchive.com/story2.html	the source has relationship with the subject	the source is presumed unreliable	the subject covers the topic in details	✘ No
https://pressgazette.co.uk/archive-content/bitter-battle-at-wapping-scenes-at-the-frontline/	the source is independent of the topic	the source is a well known newspaper	the source does not cover the subject in details	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Y. However, https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/history/blog/2021/birth-liverpool-free-press/ is not a reliable site as it is an university site and the article is from the student who was major in history - scroll down to the bottom and read the info. 01:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Creating article

Please create an article in via Wikipedia:Articles for creation where by the subject is notable, the content adhere to all the requirement and appropriate tagging/labeling/linkings as discussed from Assignment 1-8. Some notable subjects could be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/API Women, Merab Dvalishvili and Raoni Barcelos notable MMA fighters - see Merab and https://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Raoni-Barcelos-94587 Raoni] article can be created from the redirect pages Merab and Ranoni.

Ans:Draft:Paweena Hongsakul

https://iwmcf.net/award/2007/14 is considered not reliable site. I dont take https://thethaiger.com/ as 100% reliable source - as they are a very young regional and not national publication - see here-1 and usually a well-reputable newspapers wont need to show their team members - see here-s and no gossip is on the site. If you are resides in Thailand and understand Thai language, and know the subject name in Thai then you can look her up on Thai newspaper in Thai languages like Bangkok post or something as we accept any language as long as the sources are independent and reliable. I am sure you can find them. Once you have done so, let me know. Cassiopeia talk 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

Uncle Bash007, Assignment 9 - last assignment before Final exam. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 08:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Thank you, Best.

Hi @Cassiopeia, I am through with the assignment.

Hi @Cassiopeia:, I am through with the assignment. Thank you, best.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Cassiopeia:, I am through with the assignment. Thank you, best.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Uncle Bash007, See review and see notes below as they are VERY IMPORTANT for your final exam (need to review the article correctly especially on source (reliable and independent, copyvio) and secondly CSD need to be correct of you will fail the exam (need 80% rights answers)

1. Any source that is from private company, edu, gov, blog, foundation, social media, their websites are considered NOT reliable as no one is checking the fact of the content. Secondly, source (such as from books or "major" news paper" is that reliable but the article is an "interview piece" or a "opinion piece" then it is reliable source(the site not the journalist) but not independent; sometimes the source is independent but they buy the article from other sites then we eed to check the original site to understand the reliability or independently of the original source. 2. To pass the GNG notability guidelines, "the subject needs to have significant coverage from independent, reliable sources where by the sources talk about the subject in length and in depth and not passing mentioned (such as stats of the players) for verification". Source that is passing mentioned can be included in the article BUT it can NOT be contribute to the GNG requirements. Althought there is no indication the number of articles needed for significant coverage - I would suggest not, one, a few, several but at least 5.

PLEASE ask me any questions you have or anything you need to clarify before the final exam. Once you have finished the sources for the draft article for Paweena Hongsakul then ping me. Again, I am sorry for the delay reviewing the article

Pls see all the notes from assignment 1 and 9 below

Notes

Assignment 1

• WP:AGF and not WP:BITE -We should always help the new editors who want to provide good contribution and want to improve Wikipedia even at time they might not know the the Wikipedia guidelines

• WP:Notability - In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy.

• WP:GNG and SSN - both could be used when reviewing an article.

Assignment 2

• WP:Sources - Sources needed are significant coverage of published Independent / WP:SECONDARY , reliable sources to verify the content claimed where by the sources talk about the subject in lenght and in depth and not only passing mentioned.

Assignment 3

• WP:Content Policy - Article needs to adhere to Wikipedia Content Policy in article article title, WP:Biographies of living persons, image and text (Wikipedia:Image use policy and WP:COPYVIO, WP:NPOV, verifiability

• WP:COPYVIO - Public domain and note proper nouns are not Copyvio

• Wikipedia:Image use policy - check the original source

Assignment 4

• WP:CSD - go through the criteria

• WP:COI / WP:PAID - Self-disclosure by COI/PAID editors is one of the many ways we find out that they are COI/PAID. The different between a COI say an COI editor write about themselves, or friends is that written prose is not that perfect as compared that to a professional writers' (PAID editor). Secondly, if the article is about a company, the prose of the article is written more like a businesslike (business writing). Thirdly, professional paid editor would provide neat citations and only take one or 2 edits to create the article. In addition, professional PAID editors would create multiple different companies article that normal COI editors would not. Do note PAID is a subset of COI and an COI would also a PAID editor such as a small business owner write about their company or a rapper write about their own article in Wikipedia

• G11 (promo) - What constitute a G11? At times it is hard to define. Although if a article is blantantly promote or advertise about the subject then it is a G11. Sometimes, the it is a little subtle and that would be a judgement call. As a rule of thumb, if article about an entertainers (actor/singer/DJ/artist and etc) in dept of how hard they work, how motivated they are, using all the puffery/flowery languages and especially the subject does not meet notability guidelines. For a corporation, we would see they list down all they product/services, their directors/key person in the company, they mission, their client, they are the influencer in their industrial, all the words/phrased to enhance/market the company and no substantial info that is supported by independent reliable sources. If you look at the this version of Zapp Scooters which you tagged G11, I have to agree with the editor who removed the tag that it is not a G11 and unsourced info can be removed.

• G12 (copyvio) - Copyright violation addresses the use of original expression without permission of the holder which is a violation of laws even the credit is given to the source. For articles, the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.

• A7, A9 and A11 - "Claimed of signification" - As long as the content states a claim of significant in regardless there is no source provided or the claim might not be true, then A7/A9/A11 does NOT apply. Example: "John Smiths is the US senator who lives in Texas" or " Let's Jump, Let's Dance is ranked #2 in Billboard chart in October 2019" or "DM7-29 is a U.S. self-propelled artillery gun developed in 2010 capable hitting the target of 500 miles" - all these 3 examples do claim of significant and some of them might not even be true and there have no source, but they do not qualify for A7/A9/A11. The option is either to PROP them or to do a WP:BEFORE or to do a R2, for potential subject, if it has no source or only primary source provided and if they fails the WP:BEFORE then AfD them. A7 would be something like "John Smiths is my high school teacher, who have a lot of knowledge of algebra" or "The Minnesota Valhalla is the heavy metal band from Minnesota. The band makes up of my brother, Alan, my little sister, Mary and two of my mates, Ken and Jesus. We practice every Monday and Friday at our home garage".

Assignment 5

• WP:NPPDRAFT - do so for articles have no sources or sources that are primary/not independent, such as from their home page, user generated sites or sport databases, club home page for sportspersons. If you would find 3 independent, reliable sources to support the notability of the subject, then please do so and add the source in the article and mark reviewed. It can be tempting for new reviewers to overuse this; it should not be used as a substitute for taking an article to AfD.

• PROD - (1) When it does not fall under CSD but not controversial deletion with the notion that it will be deleted if the article is AfDed. (2) We can only PROD the article once thus do check the history page to make sure the article has not been PROD before. (3) If the PROD is removed, do not replace it (4) PROD would last for 7 day start from the date of the nomination and will be either deleted or removed of the tag by an uninvolved admin who decides the outcome of the nomination.

• BLPROD - (1) nominated if only there is no source for article about a living person. (2) BLPPROD can be removed only an reliable is added. (3) Even item 2 has been performed but editor still think it is should be deleted under PROD (1) criteria then a PROD can be tag. (3) if PROD (1) is not applicable and editor could nominate the article for AfD if the subject is not notable.

• AfD - Nominated articles to AfD if the subject is not notable or fall under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. A WP:BEFORE should be done prior the nominated. If the article states the nationality of the subject and a local name is provided, do search the local name in said country in Google to look for sources if any (2) Reason / justification based on notability guidelines should be address when nominate AfD or participate in a AfD. (3) Do not AfD if the sources are provided but you can locate/view them due to paywall, print book/article to determined the content claimed as per sources. (4) Request paywall article /print book from WP:RX to view the content (make sure you have you email provided in your preferences page, so the RX editors could send you the article via email). (4) You might want to reconsider to AfD an article if the sources of the article would be found mostly in other languages besides English or your languages you comprehend. For example if an article is about a Russian poet or sportman or actors / singer but the subject has not reach worldwide notability/popularity where by most source could not be found in their country reliable newspapers or books other languages but English. I dont often participate/vote for Indian actors as I dont read any Indian languages.

Assignment 6

• Taggaing - sue scripts/tools to tag appropriate cat/wikiproject/subsort/issues in the their respectively fields.

Assignment 7

• Many ways to communicate with the editors - focus on the subject not the ediots. Be civil and helpful always.

While notability is the most important concept for a reviewer, communication is our most important responsibility. Communication takes a few forms for the NPP reviewer:

• Always using clear and helpful edit summaries while patrolling - While using edit summaries is generally good practice, while doing NPP it's important to take it a step further. For instance, a common occurance will be to find an album by a musician with a page, but a particular album doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria of WP:NALBUM. The normal patrol action here is to redirect the album to the page of the artist. An inadequate edit summary would be "redirecting to artist" or some such. I prefer a more complete summary along the lines of "No indication in article of how album is notable per WP:NALBUMS. Redirecting as an WP:ATD."
• Edit summaries are not a replacement, however, for real communication. Depending on context this should either be done on the talk page or the user talk page of the editor. This is especially to be done even if the other editor is only communicating through edit summaries. We have a higher obligation to do it right. Doing this proactively is great. Just as frequently it will be more reactive - for most editors who contact you it will be out of confusion or ignorance. However you will get some angry ones as well. In all cases being the calm professional one in the conversation is vital.
• The final main mode of communication is through the toolset itself. Find a great article? Make sure to leave a comment. See a few articles in a row by a newer user all of which are notable? Leave some wiki love.
• There are a few essential policies and guidelines when it comes to communication. Please read (or re-read) Wikipedia:Assume good faith, WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL, and Wikipedia:Etiquette.

Assignment 8

• Tools - as per listed

Assignment 9

• Reviewing article - Apply what have learnt from Assignment 1-8 when reviewing article.

• Paywall site: If the source is from a paywall site, then see help from WP:RX and you need to forward me the print article once WP:RX send it to you via email.

• Lack of sources : If there is lack of sources, we need to do a WP:BEFORE, then we and add in the sources (at least 3 independent, reliable sources in the article) if we going to mark review.

• Print sources: I do suggest to avoid any print sources for they are hard to located.

• Digital sources of foreign languages: If the sources are digital and in foreign languages, then get it translated.

• Filtering: If you are going to AfD, or PROD then you need to provide reasons of why you are doing do. I would like you to work on different outcomes (some review, some nominated AfD or PROD); however, you still need to do the rest of the requirement such as tagging cats, Wiki Project, subsort (if it is a sub class), send personal messages and etc.

• Work on subject you are familiar with

• For any article without source and you would like to review it and accept the article (meet notability requirements) then you need to find the independent sources (at least 3) which would support the content claimed then place inline citation.

• If you have a hard time to find (say the sources most probably in foreign languages) and it is a potential article, then do a R2.

• For foreign language sources, use google translate, I do that all the time.

• If there is a native name provided in the article, and you know which country the subject is from, then google the native name with the associate country in google search such as a Russian subject then Google search on "native name.ru".

• When reviewing, first pls check if the article fit CSD criteria (do remember to check copyvio), then if the article has no source - do a R2 (I usualy do a R2 for potential article) or tag BLPPROD if it is a BLP or search for the source (I always search for source if I know the subject is notable and add the sources it). For sourced articles, check sources against content claimed. If meet notability guidelines (at least 3 independent, reliable sources needed and check SSN guidelines), then mark review. If the article fails the notability guidelines, then do a PROD if you think if send to AfD will be a definitely delete or nominate AfD for discussion, if you think a discussion should take place.

• Always check all the sources. Any articles that you not sure if it meets notability guidelines, then left them to other patroller.

• When reviewing, make sure take your time - always quality over quantity.

• Creating article - make sure the subject is notable with significant coverage of published Independent / WP:SECONDARY , reliable sources to verify the content claimed where by the sources talk about the subject in length and in depth and not only passing mentioned.

Cassiopeia talk 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @ Cassiopeia talk when is the final exams pls

Uncle Bash007, I can post the final exam for you but you have to finish Draft:Paweena Hongsakul (pls read the comment on assignment 9) for final exam has a lot of questions and it will take you some time to finish. Let me know. Cassiopeia talk 10:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I understand. I will let you know when am ready, thank you. Cassiopeia talk

Best.

Hi Cassiopeia talk

I want to finish this program by first week of December. Can you post my exams pls.

---

Final Exam

Part 1

1. In your own words, why and how do communicate with the editor and why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE them?

• Answer:

2. What kind of sources are needed to demonstrate/contribute the notability of the subject? Why it is important?

• Answer:

3.What constitutes a WP:COPYVIO? and why it is not a copyvio even the texts are identical the same as per sources?

• Answer:

4. What should we do when we encounter WP:COPYVIO article and what should we place on the COPYVIO editor's talk page?

• Answer:

5. What should we do when we encounter WP:PAID article and what should we place on the PAID editor's talk page?

• Answer:

6. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?

• Answer:

7. What constitute an article is a WP:PROMO page? and what should do do when we encounter one?

• Answer:

8. Why do we tag a page? What are the normal tags we place in an article

• Answer:

9. When do we WP:R2 a page?

• Answer:

10. When do we WP:PROD a page?

• Answer:

11. When do we WP:BLPPROD a page?

• Answer:

12. When do we WP:AfD a page?

• Answer:

13. Why it is important to WP:CSD a page when the article fit the CSD criteria?

• Answer:

14. When do we decide to WP:R2 / WP:PROD / WP:BLPPROD a page when the article has no source in it?

• Answer:

15. In your own words, list 5 things you have learnt from observing and participating in AfD.

• Answer i:

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

Part 2

Pls read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diff/links

Answer i:

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

Part 3

Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diff and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.

Answer i:

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

Part 4

Pls read and A1-A11 and R2 at WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and hist diff.

Answer i:

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

Part 5

1. Nominate 2 articles for WP:PROD and state your reasons. Answer i:

• Answer ii:

2. Nominate 1 article for WP:BLPROD and state your reasons. Answer i:

3. Pls read WP:R2 and WP:NPPDRAFT and provide 2 successful WP:R2 from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and hist diff.

Answer i:

• Answer ii:

Part 6

1. Participate in 5 WP:AFD where by you are the first voter of the discussion. Please provide you reason either to delete, keep, redirect or merge. Answer i:

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

Part 7

Nominate 5 articles for WP:AFD by using WP:Twinkle and provide explanation of your nomination.

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

Part 8

Pls list 10 things needs to be considered/done when reviewing a page.'

• Answer i:

• Answer ii:

• Answer iii:

• Answer iv:

• Answer v:

• Answer vi:

• Answer vii:

• Answer viii:

• Answer xi:

• Answer x:

Part 9

Pls follow the NPP flowchart and read all the reading material provide from Assignment and tools 1-8 and answer the questions below. Please pick 5 articles that meet the notability guidelines (no PROD/BLPPROD/R2/AfD/CSD) from the new pages from Special:NewPagesFeed and follow the NPP flowchart and provide the appropriate answer below (pls place N/A if not applicable). Pick articles that have 3-4 sources for the exercises below. (pls provide link and hist diff)

1

1.

1. Article =
2. Article titles =
3. Images copyright =
4. NPOV =
5. COI / PAID =
6. COPYVIO =
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr =
9. Categories =
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD =
11. Reason (for 10) =
12. WikiProject =
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

2

2.

1. Article =
2. Article titles =
3. Images copyright =
4. NPOV =
5. COI / PAID =
6. COPYVIO =
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr =
9. Categories =
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD =
11. Reason (for 10) =
12. WikiProject =
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

3

3.

1. Article =
2. Article titles =
3. Images copyright =
4. NPOV =
5. COI / PAID =
6. COPYVIO =
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr =
9. Categories =
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD =
11. Reason (for 10) =
12. WikiProject =
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

4

4.

1. Article =
2. Article titles =
3. Images copyright =
4. NPOV =
5. COI / PAID =
6. COPYVIO =
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr =
9. Categories =
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD =
11. Reason (for 10) =
12. WikiProject =
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

5

5.

1. Article =
2. Article titles =
3. Images copyright =
4. NPOV =
5. COI / PAID =
6. COPYVIO =
7. Article Class =
8. Short Descr =
9. Categories =
10. Review/AfD/PROP/CSD =
11. Reason (for 10) =
12. WikiProject =
13. Sources

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				✔ Yes
				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Part 10

Creating article

Please create an article in via Wikipedia:Articles for creation where by the subject is notable, the content adhere to all the requirement and appropriate tagging/labeling/linking as discussed from Assignment 1-8. Some notable subjects could be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/API Women.

Answer:

---

Uncle Bash007 See final exam above. All the best! Cassiopeia talk 22:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Cassiopeia talk Do I have a deadline to finish the exams?

best