User:Fletchal/Gender violence/DiaEdie Peer Review

Peer review Diana

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review. You did awesome on here great work. I am hoping for the same on my end.

General info

• Fetchal/gender violence
• Link to draft you're reviewing:Gender violence

Lead

Guiding questions:

• I believe so and has various definitions
• Yes it does it goes into depth on what those definitions mean
• Yes it does and it goes into various areas in the world where gender violence is happening.
• I am not sure
• It is concise on straight to the topic from a global point of view

Content

Guiding questions:

• Yes it coincides with what is being discussed
• The content added is up to date although there were instances from the past but I think that is to show the history of gender violence
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• The content is neutral
• No
• I thought Europe was underrepresented
• No

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they do the sources match the content.
• yes they are current.
• Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Easy to read and understand
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no it is correct
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes each content has its own section

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media No

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
• What are the strengths of the content added?
• How can the content added be improved?