User:Hayward 24/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?

(Provide a link to the article here.) Talk:Modern_architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Currently, I am junior studying architecture, so not only is it a personal interest it will also assist me in my current major.

Evaluate the article

Overall, The article on Modern Architecture is strong. The intro of the page is very informational but is not elongated, the intro also incorporated quick links to all different spots of the article in case someone is looking for something specific. Every header on the page is short and simply makes it very clarified on what each paragraph is going to talk about. The page also consists of many images which is a must when talking about architecture, giving the reader visual aids on the time period or architect. The talk pages are quite interesting though, it consists of people wanting to add certain structures or architects who they believe made a difference in modern architecture. there are also a lot of talks about confusion on how certain buildings or architects tie into each other based on the timelines. After reading through it the page is a reliable, and strong but, I can thing of ideas that could be added that in my opinion could make the page stronger.

Hayward 24 (talk) 22:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)