User:Kaseyfountain/Choose an Article

Article Selection

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Cat flu
Article Evaluation
The content is relevant to the topic and the article in neutral.There is a table at the end of the article and some of the information does not pertain to just cat flu, it has information about influenza in different animals which is not necessary. A few of the claims have citations but not all of them. The references are good and accessible. There are only two comments on the talk page, one saying the article is incoherent, and another asking what to do if your cat has the flu, so not much going on there.
Sources: https://perthvetcare.com.au/pet-library/cat-flu/

Article title: Bladder cancer in cats and dogs
Article Evaluation: The content is related to the topic, and the article has subheadings but the content in each is very small, some only have one sentence. Most of the claims have references but not all. One of the references does not have a hyperlink so it would take awhile to find. There is only one comment on the talk page, and it is just about an edit that has been made.
Sources: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0925443912001871?token=28B5DC4F774CB54BD8D6A320ECBB7E9B839C0D9261B4D85A2525267137C7D8BFA14920DFCE2C315666B68258718A9D1E&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20211022010708; https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/7/4/190/htm

Kennel cough
Article Evaluation: There is quite a bit of content and it is related to the topic. Some of the sections do not have as much information as others, but the content is neutral. Most claims have citations but some still need one. There are a lot of references that can be accessed and look reputable. There are only a few comments on the talk page and most of them talk about whether or not kennel cough can be transmitted to humans.
Sources: https://petliferadio.com/2018_AH_Pet_Parents_Guide.pdf#page=29; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348620/

Article title: Moxidectin
Article Evaluation: This article has a good start with subtopics and information. The content relates to the topic although some sentences focus on one species in particular when it should be more broad about this medication. The history subtopic is at the bottom, so the article could use some rearrangement. The lead paragraph does not mention anything about the history when it should since it is mentioned later on. Claims have citations, and the references are accessible and reputable. There are only two comments on the talk page, and one mentions that the article is "advertisement" and the other is asking about an edit they want to add, so there is not much being talked about.
Sources: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2211320719300594?token=B59BDBC4411592485C22A0692C6C6FD54EDE09898CEAEC0221D316A15D657AAA9D13A2665796B91FDCA78C6B110422C9&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20211022013239; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13071-019-3702-6

Article title: Anaplasmosis
Article Evaluation: The content of the article is relevant to the topic, but some of the subtopics could use more information. The lead paragraph does not reference all of the subtopics below. The content is neutral but some of the subtopics contain much more information than others. Most of the claims have citations but not all. There are multiple reputable references at the end of the article. The talk page is mainly edits that people have made or criticisms about the page.
Sources: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314826/; https://www.uvlf.sk/document/folia-veterinaria-volume-64-issue-4-dec-2020.pdf#page=21