User:Sansvoix/Archive1

"Cleaning up" talk pages

Standard practice at Wikipedia is to archive talk into an archive page created with a slash. Otherwise it appears that the user was trying to hide the comments on the talk page by deleting them. An example archive would be User talk:Sansvoix/Archive1. Hu 04:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

SANSVOIX. HERE is some comments you have been COVERING UP (yes, it can be found in your history). DONT YOU DARE REMOVE IT!

"I believe that my contribution to the U.S. article was a positive one..."
"Sorry, didn't mean to be offensive..."
"makes it seem like the article is expressing an opinion..."
"Again, I didn't mean to be anti-social...I wasn't persnally attacking anyone"
"unsigned bullet points (put there by you) making it seem like there are a lot of people with "For Removal" views"
"your posts should be signed"
"How is the article "borderline satire"?"
"Your recent edit left the last paragraph unintelligible"

Yours truly,--Koool 05:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Taking comments out of context is a deceitful debating technique. Please don't indulge. Hu 05:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Sansvoix is the one being decietfull. He has been told time and time again. Not to cover up the criticisms on his talk page..

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASansvoix&diff=30164987&oldid=28010462

I can see how Hu would be quick to defend him though (a brother socialist), Hu arn't you the one who edited Christianity out of the socialism article? Talk:Socialism#ATTENTION_ALL_CHRISTIANS.21.21.21.21--Koool 05:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

You don't have a clue about my political beliefs. I didn't edit Christianity out of the Socialism article. I edited one non-Neutral point of view sentence out of one paragraph. Hu 05:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Don't worry about it Hu, I'm used to running into these people on Wikipedia. All the time.--sansvoix 05:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)