User:Shenglintan/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: Push-up
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
- I choose the article because it is related to my topic which is the exercise actions to loss weight. This action is easy to do at home and don't need help from others.

Guiding questions: The Lead does include the introductory sentences with the introduction of the topic.; There is a brief description of the article in the lead.; The lead doesn't include information that is not present in the article.; the Lead is concise in my opinion.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

In my opinion, the lead of this article is concise and comprehensive.

Guiding questions: The article's content is relevant to the topic.; The content is up-to-date based on my research.; I didn't find any missing or not belonging content.; This article not related to the historically underrepresented population or topics.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
Is the content up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

The content is very specific and sorted by many different categories.

Guiding questions: The article is neutral.; There isn't any claims taht appear heavily biased.; There is not any viewpoints that are overrepresented and underrepresented.; Beacuse the article mainly talk about the exercise actions, there are no attempt to persuade in favor of one position or away from another.

Is the article neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

It's very fair and neutral.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- No
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- No, because it's all about the exercise action.
Are the sources current?
- Yes
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- Yes, there are lots of authors in different sources.
Check a few links. Do they work?
- It's does work.

It;s effective and helpful

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read
- Yes, it is very clear and straight-forward.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- No
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes, it is well-organized with many different categories.

It is well-organized with many categories and descriptions.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Yes, there is photos with how to do the action.
Are images well-captioned?
- yes, there is animated-photos.
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Yes, there are links and descriptions below the images
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

It is helpful and allowful.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- This article is in the topic of health- weight control
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- It is the part of wikiprojects in health part.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class

An very concise, rigorous, and comprehensive article to introduce an exercise action to control weight.

What is the article's overall status?
- The status is active.
What are the article's strengths?
- The strengths is fair and flat
How can the article be improved?
- add more video introduction if have.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- In my opinion, the artice is well-developed.

This article article is well-developed and very professional.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~