User talk:'wɪnd

May 2022

@Serols I appreciate your note. :) The edit corrected a previous change I added recently. It turns out the Greek lexicon is not sorted by English words, such as "mechanics", but rather by Greek words. That's why I corrected it, to more correctly reflect the source. I hope that clarifies things. 'wɪnd (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 'wɪnd, please use the font used here. --Serols (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: would you prefer me to use ASCII letters only? The Greek script in Unicode is what's used in the source lexicon. I checked the Wikipedia Manual of Style, but can't find any reference to that only ASCII may be used. Maybe you can help me understand. 'wɪnd (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serols Here are some Wikipedia articles which use a similar format:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography

and so on 'wɪnd (talk) 19:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 'wɪnd, please check your edit -> here. Only Greeks know what this title means. Change the title to something like title = mechanics (μηχανική) or title = μηχανική (mechanics). The first example would be better here. Please excuse my warning, it was inappropriate. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, @Serols. Now I fully understand what you mean. This makes sense to me. Thank you. :) 'wɪnd (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, @Serols, I now made it just title=mechanics since when using two words it split the tooltip weirdly into two lines. :) 'wɪnd (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 'wɪnd, this is fine. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 13:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question to @Serols concerning References

I'm gladly taking you up on your offer for questions, @Serols. There's still a lot to learn. :)

I noticed on the French Wikipedia, they have special "Reference" pages like this one https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9f%C3%A9rence:Histoire_des_notations_(Cajori) which can then easily be embedded into various Wikipedia articles as sources.

Does the English Wikipedia have something like this too? If so, is usage encouraged?

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 'wɪnd! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Interstatefive I appreciate the warm welcome. :) 'wɪnd (talk) 10:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 'wɪnd! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Does English Wikipedia have a "Reference Space" akin to French Wikipedia?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 'wɪnd! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What is the consensus around "A is (one of the) greatest works of X"?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 'wɪnd! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What to do if person who did reversal doesn't answer?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello 'wɪnd! Your additions to Cybernetics have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. The quote is from a book that is copyrighted and/or under an incompatible license (A license must allow derivatives). In many cases, it is best to summarize in your own words a quote, or only use a limited amount of it. Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 17:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sennecaster Thank you for the kind note and information. This is helpful for me. If I understand you correctly, the blockquote (and in-text attribution) I added falls under "extensive quotation of copyrighted text" (WP:NFCCEG). This is a bummer, since the 1948 original is very precise on the origins—however I now also understand the copyright perspective. Would you say the threshold for quoting goes somewhere between 200-300 words for Wikipedia? Or, where would we draw the boundary? 'wɪnd (talk) 23:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the quote is really cool actually, and I'm glad that you thought to include it. I would recalibrate your expectations; you might be able to get away with that many words, but similar to me, others may remove that much citing WP:NFCCEG. I don't like to put word counts on quotes; I think most editors would say that up to a paragraph is fine. However, quotes tend to not be within WP:NPOV as well, so that's why editors may object even a small paragraph of quoting in some cases. Here, I think if you were to trim it to the last two sentences in the first paragraph of the quote, it'd be golden. The rest can be summarized neutrally before the quote to give context. Happy editing, and feel free to reach out to me or other editors for any further quote questions. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sennecaster Thank you, I learned a lot again. I just republished according to your suggestions (which I like, and make a lot of sense to me). Also, I want to reiterate how happy I am about this interaction with you. After some unpleasant experiences earlier on Wikipedia, this gives me a lot hope as a newcomer. :) 'wɪnd (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to hear that :) I'm pleased about this interaction as well, and happy editing! Sennecaster (Chat) 03:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Semicolon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Thank you. Corrected. 'wɪnd (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]