User talk:たたたたたたたたったポンタ
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, たたたたたたたたったポンタ, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Japanese; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Japanese? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. -Lemonaka 15:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
ようこそ!
[edit]たたたたたたたたったポンタさん、はじめまして。英語版ウィキペディアへようこそ。英語版ウィキペディアへの投稿はいつでも歓迎いたしますが、残念ながら今回たたたたたたたたったポンタさんに執筆いただいた英文は英語版ウィキペディアの水準を満たしておりません。もしよろしければ、日本語版ウィキペディアの方へ投稿していただければ幸いです。ウィキペディア･プロジェクトへご参加くださり、ありがとうございます。 -Lemonaka 15:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm ArglebargleIV. I noticed that in this edit to Tokugawa shogunate, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 22:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
I am Japanese and I know Japanese history but I poor English plz release my edit --たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Plz --たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Please!!!!!!!!!!! --たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 22:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tokugawa shogunate, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kamakura shogunate. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
そんな脅しにはのらないぞ たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 05:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
俺は間違ってない たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
間違ってると管理人が言うならウィキペディアなんか信用しない たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
たたたたたたたたったポンタ said the following: "I can't threaten you like that. I'm not wrong. I don't trust Wikipedia if the admin says it's wrong."--100.1.76.9 (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 11:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)- Trying to communicate with people on english wikipedia in japanese doesn't exactly make any sense. Also, please be advised that other-language versions of wikipedia and other encyclopedias cannot be used as sources as they themselves rely on external sources and as such are not the place of origin of any of the information! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
たたたたたたたたったポンタ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am Japanese, poor English. I fixed the wrong year, but I just reverted to my version because vif12vf gave me a relentless remand. たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If your English skills are not good enough to contribute in English, you may wish to contribute to the Japanese Wikipedia until your English skills improve. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ok I only editing Japanese Wikipedia たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 11:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Then no further action needs to be taken here. This block will be over in some hours anyway. 331dot (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Vif12vf https://www.nakasendoway.com/the-story-of-the-battle-of-sekigahara/ And https://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-Sekigahara And https://go-centraljapan.jp/route/samurai/en/spots/detail.html?id=88 And https://www.mustlovejapan.com/subject/battle_of_sekigahara/ Say battle of sekigahara is 1600 たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
https://www.japanese-wiki-corpus.org/history/Restoration%20of%20Imperial%20Rule%20(Japan).html And https://www.jica.go.jp/english/mobile/about/president/speech/181019_01.html And https://www.britannica.com/event/Meiji-Restoration And https://aboutjapan.japansociety.org/the_meiji_restoration_era_1868-1889 Say Meiji restoration is 1868 たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 22:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 23:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)- You really need to start using article talk pages to get consensus. The next block is likely to be a WP:CIR block. --RegentsPark (comment) 23:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
たたたたたたたたったポンタ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry you didn't post the outsource before, and I'm sorry to do something that was sabotally editing.but This time, the i has also published the source, and Vif12vf maybe think it's a good thing that I've given up. So I'm not convinced. If you think I'm right, unlock it If you think I'm wrong, let me know the details or bad. たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 11:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am having difficulty understanding this request. I think you should edit the Japanese Wikipedia until your English skills improve. RegentsPark is correct that if you continue to edit the English Wikipedia as you are now, you will likely get a longer block. 331dot (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
たたたたたたたたったポンタ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It seems that I didn't understand what I wanted to say, so I'll write it again. This time, I posted the edited contents and sources, and Vif12vf also stopped sending back, and it seems that my editing was approved, so I think there is nothing wrong with it. たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I will not be reducing the duration of your block. You get automatically unblocked has started. (refresh). When this happens, talk about your editing plans on the talk page of the articles. You need to give us reliable sources for each change you make. Anarchyte (talk) 09:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
たたたたたたたたったポンタ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I using reliable sources and edit summary. Please explain what the problem is たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 06:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I suggest you use the remainder of the block to study WP:CITE and WP:RS. PhilKnight (talk) 09:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
December 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that in this edit to List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jp×g 22:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The article List of government of Japan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article pretty much just duplicates Draft:List of governments of Japan, and it does not look ready for mainspace yet (uncited, never submitted for review there). I would either merge this with that article or just outright delete this one.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also, cite sources when you make an article. The Japanese Wikipedia may have different sourcing standards, but here, each new article should have at least one source, and preferably more than that. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Empire of Japan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 09:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
List of governments of Japan moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, List of governments of Japan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of governments of Japan
[edit] Hello, たたたたたたたたったポンタ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of governments of Japan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of governments of Japan
[edit]
Hello, たたたたたたたたったポンタ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of governments of Japan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of governments of Japan 2
[edit] Hello, たたたたたたたたったポンタ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of governments of Japan 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of governments of Japan 2
[edit]Hello, たたたたたたたたったポンタ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of governments of Japan 2".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
March 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm John21716. I noticed that you added or changed content in two articles, which are Battle of Busan (1592) and Battle of Myeongnyang, but you have not provided adequate references that prove that both battles were the strategic victories of Japanese navy. I would like to invite you to the talk pages of Battle of Busan (1592) and Battle of Myeongnyang rather than continuing the edit war, so you can provide any other references showing that all of my arguments are wrong and prove that all other references suggested in the original article of each two battle are not as trustful as the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on these two talk pages above or my talk page. Thank you. John21716(talk) 07:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Battle of Noryang shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Considering your previous history you should reread WP:RS and stop litigating over old and primary sources based on your own interpretation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qiushufang (talk • contribs)
Your recent editing history at Battle of Myeongnyang shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jguglielmin (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dynasty. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Per Borjigin#Northern_Yuan_dynasty_(1368–1635), you are introducing hoaxes, right? -Lemonaka 15:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Qiushufang (talk) 11:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)たたたたたたたたったポンタ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, I would like to apologize for causing trouble to admins and other users by participating in the edit war. My edits were indeed sourceless part way through, but in recent edits I have attached the source and tried to solve the neutrality issue by stating "Disputed". Where did my most recent edit go wrong? I would appreciate it if you could let me know if there is. In the future, I would like to try to resolve the issue through discussion. --たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
None of this addresses your violation of WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of conflicts by duration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franco-Spanish War. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)