User talk:125M L0CK
January 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jacenty359. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jacenty359 (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meowth. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Meowth was changed by 125M L0CK (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958227 on 2019-01-21T22:00:46+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meowth, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Banette. Jacenty359 (talk) 22:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)