User talk:2600:1:92C2:8BFC:CCC9:8BBD:FFEF:C0CF

May 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NJA | talk 14:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

2600:1:92C2:8BFC:CCC9:8BBD:FFEF:C0CF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was trying to revert vandalism

Accept reason:

Accepted and apologies. Happy editing. NJA | talk 17:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

@NJA: I am the good guy . 2600:1:92C2:8BFC:CCC9:8BBD:FFEF:C0CF (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Can you explain you revert to this version of "The Book"? NJA | talk 14:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

NJA That really does look like they made a mistaken undo but the rest of the edits appear to be reverting vandalism at first glance? Praxidicae (talk) 15:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Praxidicae I don’t disagree, I’m willing to unblock awaiting them to confirm the position. Shall mark as pending / reviewing. NJA | talk 15:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Well, the block is for "persistently making disruptive edits," but for the most part the edits look like RVV's. And who hasn't accidently reverted to the wrong version at some time? DlohCierekim 16:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your help reverting vandalism, and keep up the great work. – bradv🍁 18:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

---