Jump to content

User talk:50.100.44.234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 00:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Information icon Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Miss Piggy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rowlf the Dog. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rowlf the Dog was changed by 50.100.44.234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955649 on 2024-10-31T19:07:40+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scooter (Muppet). My Pants Metal (talk) 19:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.100.44.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi. I've notice I was blocked for vandalism but here are 5 good reasons as to why I should be unblocked. 1. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit and improve articles. 2. Anyone can use talk pages for discussing improvements to articles, which are helpful. 3. Reliable sources are helpful for building to encyclopedia. 4. Making constructive edits helps build the encyclopedia. 5. The reference desk is a fun little chat room where you can discuss things about topics. I would greatly appreciate it if you would unblock me. Thanks. 50.100.44.234 (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.100.44.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi. I've noticed I was blocked for vandalism but the block is no longer necessary. I have read Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, and I will now refrain from causing damage or disruption and will make useful contributions instead. I would appreciate it if you would consider unblocking me. Thanks. 50.100.44.234 (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. At the very best this is WP:LOUTSOCK, but regardless, it's now a checkuser block. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for two weeks mid-October for vandalism. When the block expired, you came back and vandalized some more. Why should we believe that you won't simply do the same thing again if unblocked? -- asilvering (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.100.44.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi. I've noticed I was blocked for vandalism and abuse. But I would like to be unblocked, because I'm sorry for vandalism and abuse. I have now refrained from making any disruptive behavior, and will instead make useful contributions, and will contribute positively to the encyclopedia. I would greatly appreciate it if you would consider unblocking me on Wikipedia. Thank You. 50.100.44.234 (talk) 02:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing at all and largely repeats the previous two declined request. Next similar request will likely result in talk page access being revoked. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.