User talk:62.253.152.178

February 2015

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Computer data storage because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peasants' Revolt‎, you may be blocked from editing. Keri (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

......Dont hurt me— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.152.178 (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2015

May 2015

Hello, I'm JeremiahY. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Julius Caesar without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JeremiahY (talk) 08:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Babitaarora ^{(talk/contribs)} 09:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Vaisakhi. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015

Hello, I'm BU Rob13. An edit you recently made to Weddings in the United States seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Rob^Talk 09:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Henry II of England— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geology of Nepal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Politics— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 09:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Politics with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 11:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alps has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alps was changed by 62.253.152.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960747 on 2017-06-29T10:37:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sam Preece concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sam Preece, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sam Preece

Hello, 62.253.152.178. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sam Preece".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Nygaard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Angus1986 (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dharmachakra has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dharmachakra was changed by 62.253.152.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979922 on 2019-10-08T11:14:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian cross. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christian cross was changed by 62.253.152.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974797 on 2019-10-08T11:17:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to George Taylor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: George Taylor was changed by 62.253.152.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959288 on 2019-10-21T13:43:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to George Taylor. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to George Taylor, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Barbara. Serols (talk) 13:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

---