User talk:67.161.176.99

Only warning

It is quite clear that you are Satbir Singh (talk · contribs) editing in defiance of your block. Please stop. -SpacemanSpiff 04:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know anything of Ancient tribes of India including the Kamboj, Shak, Madras. If so come forward and discuss and we will see. Are you Dabu oe what?

67.161.176.99 (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kambojas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -SpacemanSpiff 04:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hey Spaceman or what you are?

I am not in edit war. I am trying to protect the deletion of real information from jahl/ignorant people like you, dabu and the ilk. Come and discuss on Kambojas page and justify the continued deletion of information on Kamboj People. Once again Come and discuss in a rational manner. OK? 67.161.176.99 (talk) 05:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I just advise you not to revert back unless you demonstrate on talk page on Kambojas that your reversion is justified. OK? 05:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Let's get something clear, you have been indefinitely blocked, coming back as an IP isn't right, and quite obviously, no discussion with you until your block is lifted. You can send in a request to Arbcom for that, given that your ability to edit your talk page has been removed. -SpacemanSpiff 05:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jahl/ignorant People like you blocked me unfairly and it is your duty to have me unblocked. Untill then, dont try to revert the Kambojas

05:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC) You are evading your block. We can discuss the changes but stop reverting it to your desired version--NotedGrant Talk 05:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biased and ignorant wiki-administrators like you, Dabu and the ilk have conspired to delete the genuine infoermation on Kamboja and other related peopke simply because they are themselves ignorant and do not know anything about their history. If you have the balls, unblock me and then discus on Kambojas page and justify deletuion of Kamboja information. You guys/gals are not sure of yourself and are simply following the crwod or damn dabu 67.161.176.99 (talk) 05:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing, edit-warring and block evasion. If you are interested in editing wikipedia, appeal your original block at Satbir Singh (talk · contribs), instead of trying to edit as an IP. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Abecedare (talk) 05:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I knew that you dont have balls. If you do have, then unblock me and then come on Kambojas page and we will see. Are you really a man ?(or else a woman????). Come on guy/gal, let us straighten out the mess you self-styled wiki administrators have made in suppressing genuine historical information on Indian history?. Have got the guts? 67.161.176.99 (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notedgrant (talk | contribs)......you are a chip of the same block. The selfstyle wikipedia adminisitrators like Dabu, itsmejudith and you are simply trying to misuse the wikipedia to satisfy you vain and empty ego and trying to suppress the genuine historical information. It would not happen, mind it? Once again, do you have the balls to come and discuss the issue on Kambojas page. Or else like dabu, Itsmejudith or their ilk, you would also continue resort to the demeaning and unmanly tricks of blocking me by name or by my IP address and reverting my edits? ARE YOU REALLY A MAN????? 67.161.176.99 (talk) 05:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Notedgrant (talk | contribs)......ARE YOU REALLY A MAN????? If not, then unblock me and we will meet on the Kambojas page on equal footoings. If you are coward which I think you really are, you would continue to stoop low and use the meanest and dirtiest weapon which people like you and other self-styled wikipedia administrators have grabbed to meanly punish/penalize those few who dare to defy these dorks and challenge them to discuss the issuews in a rational manner on the talk page

67.161.176.99 (talk) 05:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would this effeminate Notedgrant and his ilk like dabu, itsmejudith, Spaceman-spiff (or what) would unblock me and dare to discuss the relevant issues on the Kamboj history on the Kambojas talk page? ...Hey Itsmejudith, how about discussing the snippets on Kambojas appearing in ancient Indian texts, and the synthesis of Kamboja history by Satbir Singh? Would you like to discuss this all on the Kambojas talk page? 67.161.176.99 (talk) 05:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:67.161.176.99. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Do not verbal attack another editor. arunkumar^{checkmate me} 12:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What if the ignorant and arrogant editors like Dabu, Notedgrant, Itsmejudih and Spaceman play loose and go on reverting or deleting the real/documented information about ancient Indian/Central Asian people? What authority do they have to do that? Instead of improving the articles, they are simply trying to distort them, delete them or making them messier and unrealistic. And they also simultanously admit that they dont know much about the topics. It is very clear that most of these editors are mere spell-checkers and nothing more.

BTW, do you have any knowledge of the ancient Indian/Central people like Sakas, Kambojas, Pahlavas etc????. If so unblock me and come on the Kambojas talk page and we will see.

67.161.176.99 (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit-warring, socking and block evasion. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Abecedare (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The silly 'know-nothing' joker, Spaceamn-spiff or what the hell he/she is and the other jokers like Dabu, Itsmejudith etc have not an iota of knowledge about Indian/Central Asian History. They do not have the gonads to come forward on the Kambojas page and start a constructive discussion on the topics. These dorks are simply plunging too low, misusing their self-acquired administrative preiviliges and are unlawfully blocking me from expressing my fitting responses to their uncalled for reverts/blocks/deletions or silly edits on these ancient historical people like the Sakas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Paradas etc. Let's see how long these idiots could extend their blockage and exercise prejudices against me.

67.161.176.99 (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) Most of the people you are complaining about are not administrators. 2) Administrative tools are not self-acquired and administrators are not self-styled. 3) You do not have a legal right to edit Wikipedia. 4) Synthesis is not appropriate for Wikipedia articles. If you would like to publish original research, please do so elsewhere. 5) As long as you continue to engage in personal attacks and evade your block through IP editing, the block on this IP address will continue to be reinstated/extended. I hope this answers your questions. Dekimasuよ! 04:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You first need to prove that the information I have put on Wikipedia regarding Central AsiaN Tribes like the Kambojas, Sakas, Paradas, Pahlavas etc is synthesized by myself. I have provided numerous relevant references for each and every statement in my edits of any article I have edited. Looks like you or others like you who are blocking me or deleting the information I put or revert my edits, first need to learn history about these people. If you or these vandalists want to discuss specific issues in my edits, then come forward and discuss it on this or on Kamboja talk page. Otherwise stay off and unblock me. You guys can not legally continue to block me for ever on the lame and baseless plea that my edits contain synthesized material, not supported by renowned scholars or ancient sources.

It is also obvious that most of the cotrie involved in this dirty game are same couple of old time ID's who are now coming under different ID's and playing the dirty and prejudiced game. It is shame on these people.

67.161.176.99 (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.