User talk:82.38.157.176

Welcome!

Extended content

Hello 82.38.157.176! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (82.38.157.176) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 20:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your recent edits

Extended content

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Most expensive animated films page

Extended content

I edited the links and added some new titles, first of all, you have to rename the title: "List of most expensive animated films", second, we have to decide on what is the lowest budget we can add, I say we put the limit somewhere at $140-$150m, because there are many animated films that have big budget that we may not have heard of, it doesn't matter if we have a top 50 or top 30, 25. I will find and add some new titles later. DCF94 (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC) How do we change tilte?

AfC notification: Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films has a new comment

Extended content
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Extended content

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Hybrid films submission

Extended content
Now that you have added the definition of hybrid films, you may go ahead and resubmit. I won't be the reviewer this time. I would prefer to get another reviewer's view. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Shaun the Sheep Movie

Extended content

I have reverted your edit and ask that you take the issue to the talk page. First, the Variety cited source DOES NOT say $104 million. The article gives a vague, imprecise approximation, saying, "passed Sept. 14 the milestone $100 million global B.O. mark" without giving an actual number or where this claim came from, whereas Box Office Mojo, which uses studio-supplied figures and is WP:FILM standard, gives a precise figure. Frankly, this edit by an anon IP on Sept. 15 [1] feels promotional in nature. I have returned the figure to the long-stable version that was there for the bulk of this article's existence. If you wish to change that status quo, you need to discuss it on the talk page rather than edit-war. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most Expensive animated Film (November 15)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rhumidian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Most Expensive animated Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also getWikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors. Rhumidian (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Hello! 82.38.157.176, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rhumidian (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Please sign your posts by adding ~~~~ to your posts.

Extended content

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Talk:List of highest-grossing films. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! --rayukk | talk 20:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Dragon Ball franchise

Extended content
Found a source for the box office, wanna do the honours? DCF94 (talk) 19:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Extended content

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia, 82.38.157.176. Your edit to Toy Story (franchise) was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  Thank you very much!  Paine  03:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please consider the creation of a free User account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Highest grossing hybrid films (November 30)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors. Primefac (talk) 06:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

Extended content

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films#Spongebob movies".The discussion is about the topic List of highest-grossing animated films. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Paleocemoski 23:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Extended content

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm Krj373. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films/Archive 5 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not edit archived pages. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 22:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. okay I see what you are doing and it makes sense. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) —Preceding undated comment added 22:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Wallace and Gromit characters (January 25)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Wallace and Gromit characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Devopam (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Extended content

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. There is absolutely no reason for you to be reverting the archive bot, and regularly using 5k on every edit. Please stop. Boomer VialHolla 08:37, 10 February 2016 82.38.157.176 (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

future animated franchise

Extended content

† Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing 22 November 2024 in theaters around the world. Highest-grossing animated franchises and film series[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show") Rank Series Total worldwide box office No. of films Average of films Highest-grossing film N/A The Incredibles $633,019,734 2 $316,509,867 The Incredibles ($633,019,734) 1 The Incredibles (2004) $633,019,734 2 The Incredibles II (2018) $0 N/A Wreck-It Ralph $471,222,889 2 $235,611,445 Wreck-It Ralph ($471,222,889) 1 Wreck-It Ralph (2012) $471,222,889 2 Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018) $0 26 Rugrats $299,590,872 3 $99,863,624 The Rugrats Movie ($140,894,675) 1 The Rugrats Movie (1998) $140,894,675 2 Rugrats in Paris: The Movie (2000) $103,291,131 3 Rugrats Go Wild (2003) $55,405,066 N/A Boonie Bears $209,482,162 6 $34,913,694 Entangled Worlds ($76,630,790) 1 Entangled Worlds (2017) $76,630,790 2 Mystical Winter (2015) $47,484,430 3 Boonie Bears III (2016) $44,577,632 4 To the Rescue (2014) $40,521,387 5 Homeward Journey (2017) $156,002 6 Robo Rumble (2017) $111,921 N/A Gnomeo & Juliet $193,967,670 2 $96,983,835 Gnomeo & Juliet ($193,967,670) 1 Gnomeo & Juliet (2011) $193,967,670 2 Sherlock Gnomes (2018) $0 N/A The Nut Job $171,834,534 2 $85,917,267 The Nut Job ($120,885,527) 1 The Nut Job (2014) $120,885,527 2 Nutty by Nature (2017) $50,949,007 N/A My Little Pony $57,923,841 5 $11,584,768 My Little Pony: The Movie (1986) ($50,911,282) My Little Pony: The Movie (1986) $5,958,456 Equestria Girls $1,054,103 3 $351,368 Equestria Girls ($483,752) 1 Equestria Girls (2013) $483,752 2 Rainbow Rocks (2014) $347,511 3 Friendship Games (2015) $222,840 My Little Pony: The Movie (2017) $50,911,282

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Wallace and Gromit characters (February 22)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Draft:List of Wallace and Gromit characters may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most Expensive animated Film (March 3)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Most Expensive animated Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films

Extended content

Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 03:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Highest-grossing hybrids Films

Extended content

82% of the films in the top 50 were released after 2000. 2006, 2010,2011 and 2016 are the most represented years on the list, with four films each. All of the films have had a theatrical run (including re-releases) since 1980, and films that have not played since then do not appear on the chart due to ticket-price inflation, population size and ticket purchasing trends not being considered. All films in the Alvin & the Chipmunks, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles , The Smurfs,Stuart Little, Scooby-Doo,Garfield, Ghostbusters, Looney Tunes, Ted and Spongebob Squarepants franchises are in the top 50 highest-grossing live action - animated films.Arthur,,Diary of a Wimpy Kid, The Pink Panther and Mickey Mouse universe also appeared frequently, Alvin & the Chipmunks and The Pink Panther, is the most represented franchise with 4 films each. highest grossing hybrid films Rank Peak Title Worldwide gross Year Ref 1 1 The Smurfs $563,749,323 2011 2 2 Ted $549,368,315 2012 3 3 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles $477,204,754 2014 4 1 Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel $443,140,005 2009 5 3 Tron: Legacy $400,062,763 2010 6 1 Alvin and the Chipmunks $361,336,633 2007 7 6 The Smurfs 2 $347,545,360 2013 8 3 Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked $342,695,435 2011 9 1 Enchanted $340,487,652 2007 10 1 Who Framed Roger Rabbit $329,803,958 1988 11 2 Stuart Little $300,135,367 1999 12 1 Ghostbusters $295,212,467 1984 13 6 G-Force $292,817,841 2009 14 3 Casper $287,928,194 1995 15 6 Scooby-Doo $275,650,703 2002 16 16 Paddington $268,047,808 2014 17 17 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows $245,623,848 2016 18 17 Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Road Chip $234,798,636 2015 19 3 Space Jam $230,418,342 1996 20 20 Ghostbusters: Answer the Call $229,147,509 2016 21 6 Elf $220,443,451 2003 22 3 Ghostbusters II $215,394,738 1989 23 21 Ted 2 $213,734,783 2015 24 14 Yogi Bear $201,584,141 2010 25 7 Garfield $200,804,534 2004 26 11 Hop $183,953,723 2011 27 27 The BFG $183,345,589 2016 28 5 Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed $180,949,045 2004 29 8 Kill Bill Vol. 1 $180,949,045 2003 30 9 Stuart Little 2 $169,956,806 2002 31 14 The Pink Panther $158,851,357 2006 32 26 Goosebumps $150,170,815 2015 33 11 Charlotte's Web $144,877,632 2006 34 34 Pete's Dragon $143,695,338 2016 35 12 Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties $141,702,264 2006 36 28 Walking with Dinosaurs $126,546,518 2013 37 28 Saving Mr. Banks $112,544,580 2013 38 19 Arthur and the Invisibles $107,944,236 2006 39 19 The Water Horse: Legend of the Deep $103,071,443 2007 40 1 Mary Poppins $102,272,727 1964 41 20 Arthur and the Revenge of Maltazard $78,520,547 2009 42 20 Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days $77,112,176 2012 43 20 The Pink Panther 2 $75,946,615 2009 44 9 Looney Tunes: Back in Action $68,514,844 2003 45 1 Song of the South $65,000,000 1946 million 46 46 Monsters Trucks $64,493,915 2016 47 21 Aliens in the Attic $57,881,056 2009 48 4 Revenge of the Pink Panther $49,579,269 1978 49 19 Fat Albert $48,551,322 2004 50 4 The Return of the Pink Panther $41,833,347 1978 References — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2016(UTC)

Highest-grossing hybrids Franchises and Film Series

Extended content

The following chart is a list of the highest-grossing hybrids film franchises. The Alvin & the Chipmunks franchise is the most successful, with worldwide box office totals of nearly $1.4 billion. A given franchise needs to have at least 2 theatrically released films to be on this list. The Smurfs franchise has the highest per-film average, with nearly $455.7 million per film.   † Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing 22 November 2024 in theaters around the world. Highest-grossing animated franchises and film series[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show") Rank Series Total worldwide box office No. of films Average of films Highest-grossing film 1 Alvin & the Chipmunks $1,381,970,709 4 $345,492,677 Chipwrecked ($443,140,005) 1 Chipwrecked (2011) $443,140,005 2 Alvin and the Chipmunks (2007) $361,336,633 3 The Squeakquel (2009) $342,695,435 4 The Road Chip (2015) $234,798,636 2 The Smurfs $911,294,683 2 $455,647,342 The Smurfs ($563,749,323) 1 The Smurfs (2011) $563,749,323 2 The Smurfs 2 (2013) $347,545,360 3 Ted $763,103,098 2 $381,551,549 Ted ($400,062,763) 1 Ted (2012) $549,368,315 2 Ted 2 (2015) $213,734,783 4 Ghostbusters $739,754,714 3 $246,584,905 Ghostbusters (1984) ($295,212,467) Original series $510,607,205 2 $255,303,603 Ghostbusters (1984) ($295,212,467) 1 Ghostbusters(1984) $295,212,467 2 Ghostbusters II (1989) $215,394,738 Answer the Call(2016) $229,147,509 5 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles $738,957,432 2 $369,478,716 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles ($493,333,584) 1 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014) $493,333,584 2 Out of the Shadows (2016) $245,623,848 6 Stuart Little $470,092,173 2 $235,046,087 Stuart Litterle ($300,135,367) 1 Stuart Little (1999) $300,135,367 2 Stuart Little 2 (2002) $169,956,806 7 Scooby-Doo $457,117,536 2 $228,558,768 Scooby Doo ($275,650,703) 1 Scooby Doo (2002) $275,650,703 2 Monsters Unleashed (2004) $181,466,833 8 Tron $433,062,763 2 $216,531,382 Legacy ($400,062,763) 1 Legacy (2010) $400,062,763 2 Tron (1982) $33,000,000 9 The Pink Panther $399,276,220 10 $39,927,622 The Pink Panther (2006) ($158,851,357) Steve Martin $234,797,972 2 $117,398,986 The Pink Panther (2006) ($158,851,357) 1 The Pink Panther (2006) $158,851,357 2 The Pink Panther 2 (2009) $75,946,615 Peter Sellers $157,548,231 6 $26,258,039 Revenge of the Pink Panther ($49,579,269) 1 Revenge of the Pink Panther (1978) $49,579,269 2 The Return of the Pink Panther (1975) $41,833,347 3 The Pink Panther Strikes Again (1976) $33,833,201 4 A Shot in the Dark (1964) $12,368,234 5 The Pink Panther (1963) $10,878,107 6 Trail of the Pink Panther (1982) $9,056,073 Roger Moore $4,491,986 1 $4,491,986 Curse of the Pink Panther ($4,491,986) 1 Curse of the Pink Panther (1983) $4,491,986 Roberto Benigni $2,438,031 1 $2,438,031 son of the Pink Panther ($2,438,031) 1 son of the Pink Panther (1983) $2,438,031 10 Garfield $342,506,798 2 $171,253,399 Garfield ($200,804,534) 1 Garfield (2004) $200,804,534 2 A Tail of Two Kitties (2006) $141,702,264 11 Paddington $307,534,409 2 $153,767,205 Paddington ($268,047,808) 1 Paddington (2014) $268,047,808 2 Paddington 2 (2017) $39,486,601 12 Looney Tunes $298,933,186 2 $149,466,593 Space Jam ($230,418,342) 1 Space Jam (1996) $230,418,342 2 Back in Action(2003) $68,514,844 13 Diary of a Wimpy Kid $265,330,423 4 $66,332,606 Dog Days ($77,112,176) 1 Dog Days (2012) $77,112,176 2 Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2010) $75,700,498 3 Rodrick Rules (2011) $72,417,394 4 The Long Haul (2017) $40,100,355 14 Arthur $217,163,702 3 $72,387,901 the Invisibles ($107,944,236) 1 the Invisibles (2006) $107,944,236 2 the Revenge of Maltazard (2009) $78,520,547 3 The War of the Two Worlds (2010) $30,698,919 15 Monty Python $44,308,849 4 $11,077,212 Life of Brian ($20,045,115) 1 Life of Brian (1979) $20,045,115 2 The Meaning of Life (1983) $14,929,552 3 the Holy Grail (1975) $9,331,792 4 Now for Something Completely Different (1971) $2,390 16 Tom and Jerry $10,730,000 2 $5,365,000 Anchors Aweigh ($7,475,000) 1 Anchors Aweigh (1945) $7,475,000 2 Dangerous When Wet(1953) $3,255,000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2016(UTC)

Your recent edits

Extended content

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of highest-grossing openings for animated films  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC) Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to List of highest-grossing animated films. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Editing...

Extended content

In light of this edit made recently by this account, I thought it important to stress a few things to the person(s) editing from this IP address. To contribute to Wikipedia, a degree of competency is required. You should be able to add sources yourself when you add or change content. Spelling and grammar are important as well. You appear to be using this talk page as a test page, and as this account has made hundreds of edits over that past few months, I strongly suggest you create an account so that you get the use of a sandbox, along with other added benefits. Either way, as long as you continue editing; You must sign your posts, You must provide proper, reliable sources, You should leave an edit summary with your changes and You should use the preview button to reduce the number of entries in an article's history. Thank you - theWOLFchild 02:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Extended content

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Toy Story. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 19:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. An edit that you recently made to Toy Story (franchise) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MBlaze Lightning -talk! 12:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar (March 29)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:List of Wallace and Gromit characters

Extended content

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Draft:List of Wallace and Gromit characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.klikdvd.com/product/detail/10596/shaun-the-sheep-the-farmers-llamas-2015.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 333-blue 13:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Extended content

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 18:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most expensive animated films has been accepted

Extended content

Most expensive animated films, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hybrids Films concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hybrids Films, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 May

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the The Wild Thornberrys page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Extended content

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing animated films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. When you change data that is well-supported by references you must update the reference with something that supports your changes Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hybrids Films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hybrids Films". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Epic rap batlles of cartoons concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Epic rap batlles of cartoons, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:4DB2:920F:8A07:D8CC. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rugrats (film series) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:4DB2:920F:8A07:D8CC (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Hello, I'm Trivialist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tinker Bell (film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Live action toy story (August 7)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralizationsAreBad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Live action toy story and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. GABgab 00:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alvin and the Chipmunks (film series) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 17:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

List of highest-grossing animated films

Extended content

Hi -- I changed the wording regarding the Wallace & Gromit films because it's confusing and unintentionally misleading "All films in the Wallace & Gromit franchise" aren't on the list -- the one theatrical film and a compilation of the shorts are, but the individual shorts aren't. (Also, I'm a fan of Aardman and W&G, so I'm not saying this because I don't want them included. :) Trivialist (talk) 13:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC) all theatrically released films are one the list the on theatrical film and a compilation of the shorts as well as the Shaun movie. But that's not what you put in the article. You said "All films in the Wallace and Gromit Franchise are on the list." The shorts are all films in the W&G franchise, and none of them are on the list, or even eligible for the list. Technically, it should be "All Wallace and Gromit-related theatrically released features are on the list," but that may be too wordy and qualified a statement to include. Trivialist (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC) If u are a wag fan you may be interested in helping me created List of Wallace & gormit characters page.82.38.157.176 (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Future stop motion list

Extended content
Highest-grossing stop motion films Rank Title Worldwide gross Year Ref

Your draft article, Draft:Longest runing animated tv series

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Longest runing animated tv series". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Sam Sailor 22:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC) Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of highest-grossing animated films, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cars (franchise)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Timmy Time, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 October

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the Draft:List of the highest grossing none share universe films page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC) Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Shaun the Sheep, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Shaun the Sheep

Extended content
Edit reverted - no Fair Use Rationale has been generated to allows that non-free image on this page. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nativity (film series) has been accepted

Extended content

Nativity (film series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Extended content

Hello 82.38.157.176, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Nativity (film series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuckie Finster (November 6)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chuckie Finster and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. SwisterTwister talk 23:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing none share universe films (November 8)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of the highest grossing none share universe films and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Chenzw  Talk  13:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 November

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the List of animated feature films of 2016 page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing none share universe films (November 13)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of the highest grossing none share universe films and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. David.moreno72 02:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing none share universe films (November 18)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of the highest grossing none share universe films and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes (November 23)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Primefac (talk) 02:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Timmy Time episodes (November 23)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Timmy Time episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Primefac (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm Feinoha. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of most expensive films without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Feinoha Talk 00:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Finding Dory, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Wild Thornberrys. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You seem to be making numerous changes to numbers without giving an explanation in the edit summary, providing a source or otherwise explaining where the information came from. If you are having trouble, please ask for help here, on my talk page or on the articles' talk pages. Thanks. SummerPhDv2.0 16:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Franchise) has been accepted

Extended content

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Franchise), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Smmurphy(Talk) 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing share universe films (December 4)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of the highest grossing share universe films and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animted films in Canada and the United States (December 26)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of highest-grossing animted films in Canada and the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Devopam (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Extended content

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of highest-grossing animated films into Draft:List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 January

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the List of Walt Disney Animation Studios films page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Extended content
Hello, 82.38.157.176. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by John from Idegon (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States (February 5)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aardman filmography (February 8)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aardman filmography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States (February 10)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToonLucas22 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. TL22 (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of the highest grossing shared Universe films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the highest grossing shared Universe films". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of longest runing animated tv series

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of longest runing animated tv series". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Reach Out to the Truth 23:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Extended content

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Disney revival era, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States (April 4)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topcipher was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. TopCipher (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disney revival era (April 9)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disney revival era and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Yashovardhan (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of animated television series by episode count

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of animated television series by episode count". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Longest running animted tv series

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Longest running animted tv series". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chuckie Finster

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chuckie Finster". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Eve (2015 TV series) episodes (June 10)

Extended content

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Eve (2015 TV series) episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. » Shadowowl | talk 10:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of the highest grossing none share universe films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the highest grossing none share universe films". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of the highest grossing share universe films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the highest grossing share universe films". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Timmy Time episodes

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Timmy Time episodes". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Draft:List of Eve (2015 TV series) episodes

Extended content

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Draft:List of Eve (2015 TV series) episodes, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of highest-grossing films in Canada and the United States concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of highest-grossing films in Canada and the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aardman filmography

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aardman filmography". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Live action toy story concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Live action toy story, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Disney revival era concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Disney revival era, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Disney revival era

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disney revival era". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Highest-grossing franchises and series

  † Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing 22 November 2024 in theaters around the world.

Highest-grossing superhero at the box office ^[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show")

Rank Series Total worldwide box office No. of films Average of films Highest-grossing film

1 batman $4,914,084,922 14 $351,006,066 The Dark Knight rise ($1,084,939,099) 1 The Dark Knight rise (2012) $1,084,939,099 2 the Dark Knight (2008) $1,004,558,444 3 Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) $873,634,919 4 Batman (1989) $411,348,924 5 Batman Begins (2005) $374,218,673 6 Batman Forever (1995) $336,529,144 7 The Lego Batman Movie (2017) $311,950,384 8 Batman Returns (1992) $266,822,354 9 Batman and Robin (1997) $238,207,122 10 Mask of the Phantasm (1993) $5,617,391 11 The Killing Joke (2016) $4,462,034 12 Batman (1966) $1,700,000 13 Return of the Caped Crusaders (2016) $57,343 14 Batman and Harley Quinn (2017) $39,091

2 X-Men $2,914,567,748 6 $485,761,291 Days of Future Past ($747,862,775) 1 Days of Future Past (2011) $747,862,775 2 Apocalypse(2007) $543,934,787 3 The Last stand (2006) $459,359,555 4 First Class (2000) $459,359,555 5 X2 (2004) $407,711,549 6 X-men (2015) $296,339,527

3 Spider-Man $4,843,426,428 6 $807,237,738 Spider-man 3 ($890,871,626) 1 spider man 3 (2007) $890,871,626 2 Homecoming (2017) $880,166,924 3 spider-man (2002) $821,708,551 4 Spider-man 2 (2004) $783,766,341 5 The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) $757,930,663 6 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) $708,982,323

4 Avengers $2,924,216,682 2 $1,462,108,341 Marvel Avengers Assemble ($1,518,812,988) 1 Marvel Avengers Assemble (2012) $1,518,812,988 2 Age of Ultron (2015) $1,405,403,694

5 superman $2,540,279,647 7 $362,897,092 Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice ($873,634,919) 1 Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) $873,634,919 2 man of steel (2013) $668,045,518 3 Superman Returns (2006) $391,081,192 4 Superman (1978) $300,218,018 5 Superman II (1980) $190,400,000 6 Superman III (1983) $80,200,000 7 The Quest for Peace (1987) $36,700,000

6 iron man $2,423,918,805 3 $807,972,935 Iron man 3 ($1,214,811,252) 1 iorn man 3 (2013) $1,214,811,252 2 iron man 2 (2011) $623,933,331 3 Iron Man (2008) $585,174,222

7 captian America $2,238,138,536 3 $746,046,179 Civil war ($1,153,304,495) 1 Civil War (2016) $1,153,304,495 2 The Winter Soldier (2014) $714,264,267 3 The First Avenger (2011) $370,569,774

8 Thor $1,945,408,441 3 $648,469,480 Ragnarok ($851,510,421) 1 Ragnarok (2017) $851,510,421 2 The Dark World (2013) $644,571,402 3 Thor (2011) $449,326,618

9 Guardians of the Galaxy $1,637,067,377 2 $818,533,689 Vol.2 ($230,418,342) 1 vol 2 (2014) $863,738,748 2 vol 1 (2003) $773,328,629

10 Wolverine $805,013,847 3 $268,337,949 Logan ($616,795,600) 1 logan (2017) $616,795,600 2 the wolverine (2010) $75,700,498 3 Rodrick Rules (2011) $72,417,394 4 The Long Haul (2017) $40,100,355

11 Arthur $217,163,702 3 $72,387,901 the Invisibles ($107,944,236) 1 the Invisibles (2006) $107,944,236 2 the Revenge of Maltazard (2009) $78,520,547 3 The War of the Two Worlds (2010) $30,698,919

---