User talk:A.D.A.M.zeen
May 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Killarnee. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Word-sense disambiguation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 20:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Identification. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 20:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Constitution of the United States, you may be blocked from editing. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 20:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- IDENTIFYING*
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 9)
[edit]This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.
This is patent nonsense.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Hello, A.D.A.M.zeen!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
|
May 2020
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Orange Mike | Talk 19:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)