User talk:AFasterSlowpoke

Owning up

9th July 2024
Ok, I don't know if anyone is reading this, but I know I took my behaviour and disruptive editing on Wikipedia too far, and I will stop my behaviour now before it goes way too far. The reason why I made my accounts XDcalamatiousXD (which had a much longer name) was to see what Wikipedia admins would do if I had a very long name, and the reason why I made the account Poopy Hioct was to see if I could make accounts even though I'm not allowed to, and I was able to, so I decided to mess around in mostly talk pages. I know I should not have made other accounts and furthermore troll on them.

I'll be completely inactive here for at least 6 months but I will be be back for a ban appeal after then. However, I'll very likely be doing infrequent minor edits after I get unbanned.

AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: btw i'm moving back to simple english wikipedia again for now because it's way easier to help that wiki. i think the reason why i had so much difficulty on this wiki is because it's kinda too formal and complete, and simple english wikipedia has slightly more leniency because there's like a total of 5 editors there. AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 20:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Golden Chicken have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to C18H27NO3 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bee Movie Script

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Bee Movie Script has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Abo Yemen. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nothing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Abo Yemen ✉ 21:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Be bold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Creepee0 (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smurfs fanon wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Smurfs fanon wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning before indef block

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok... AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That also includes adding unsourced initialisms to disambig pages. There is no evidence that J. J. Thompson was well-known as "JJT." OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok my bad

i didn't know that wasn't allowed AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

note

i won't make any edits on other accounts or ip for at least 6 months on english wikipedia to redeem myself to the wiki guys AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AFasterSlowpoke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a formal requisition for the reacquisition of my editing priviledges on the English Wikipedia: ok crazy thing but i lied about not making edits (see: User:NoPurgatory), however, those edits were constructive and not disruptive, meaning that ive shown im able to make constructive edits to the hit wiki, wikipedia. i know i should wait like 6 months because of sockpuppetery but can you make a special exception and unblock me so i can have one more incy-wincy chance to edit well and be a constructive editor, pretty please? also you should see my css skills at the bottom left corner; isn't that cool?

Decline reason:

You've demonstrated you can't be trusted. Yamla (talk) 21:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can I regain the trust of wiki mods?

Yamla

How can I be trusted again? I understand why I'm blocked and I'm sorry for vandalising, disruption and sockpuppetery, I won't do it again!

AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SO would be a good start. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note you are far closer to a community ban under WP:3X than you are to being unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Also kinda dumb question but what exactly is the difference between a block and ban.

AFasterSlowpoke (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly explained in the link I gave you. Stop wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 12:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AFasterSlowpoke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my birthday is tomorrow, so please may you unblock me as a birthday present please :3 also i wont make any more accounts or vandalise wikipedia anymore. btw, contrary to popular belief, i can be trusted because i am the founder and owner of the MiniTWOW Wiki on Miraheze.

Decline reason:

We have no interest in helping you celebrate your birthday. And the floating text you have is more annoying than anything. 331dot (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

oopsie

i think i got banned lol. also how'd you find my other alts. also i'll stop frfr. :3

edit: also digital footprint exists i should and i will stop before shit goes way too far. i mean it already went too far but i'll stop before it goes way too far. see you mfs in like 6 or 7 months when i make my ban ay-peel.