User talk:ATB1776

Living Educational Theory

Hello! In the article Living educational theory, the paragraph beginning "The methodology and process augmenting an ..." is incoherent and unsourced. The Barry thesis (Barry, 2012) says nothing about this robot project. Similarly, (Pirsig, 1974) says nothing about what Dr. Barry has done (obviously), so this is claim in the third sentence is also unsourced. Can you please fix these problems? Wikipedia requires that claims be properly sourced. If you cannot fix this problem, these claims should be deleted. Thanks! Doctormatt (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More on Living Educational Theory

Hi! I undid your edits to Living educational theory. Adding hyperlinks is not the way to add citations to wikipedia, and the article you linked to does not provide the information needed. Perhaps you could discuss these issues before editing again? That would be helpful. Please use the talk page for Living educational theory to discuss what you are trying to do. Thanks! Doctormatt (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Living Educational Theory

Please do not remove comments that you did not write from the talk page for Living educational theory. This is disruptive. If you have constructive things to say, please write them on the talk page for the article, here, or on my talk page: you have lots of options for communicating. Thanks. Doctormatt (talk) 17:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More info here Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_others'_comments. Cheers! Doctormatt (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me. Why am I blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ATB1776 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can an editor please explain why I am blocked? No reason or warning. Thank you for your time and effort to help. (ATB1776 (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

You do not appear to be directly blocked. Please try making an edit in the WP:SANDBOX, and if you still cannot edit, please submit a new unblock request detailing exactly what messages you get when you try to edit. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 06:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.