User talk:Aapro24/sandbox

What does the article (or section) do well?
This article does a great job of explaining physician burnout. I think it is extremely organized and concise. As someone who is not familiar with this topic, I was easily able to gauge what you were talking about. Additionally, I liked how you included the different kind of approaches in different sections rather than grouping it together. Visually, it helped me understand the article more.

What changes would you suggest overall? Overall, I would take out all of the "may"'s pertaining to articles. I think that the foundation of it is set, but by saying X may lead to Y, the article seems a little less credible. Furthermore, I would just make the statements a little more definitive.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? As previously mentioned, I think that the most important thing this article to do to improve is by making the statements more definitive and concise. Also, don't forget to include citations!

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? I think that my classmate did a great job of including author's names and studies, but also being able to tie it all together. Moreover, I think my article would benefit from including more statements that draw from information, rather than just stating article statistics.

Overall, really great article!!!! Julianadinardo (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)