User talk:Aboutmovies/archive2

Ewing Young

Let me add my thanks to you for adding this overdue Ewing Young article. I've got Kenneth Holmes's biography of Young, and I'll add some to the article about this much-overlooked pioneer. Thanks again! NorCalHistory 19:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Puget's Sound vs. Pugets Sound

OK, let's work together; just popped by your new Pugets Sound Agricultural Company and my first reaction is I'm pretty certain the primary title should be Puget's Sound Agricultural Company, and there should probably be a redirect from Puget Sound Agricultural Company. There's quite a bit on this in that Akriggs book I mention on the Oregon etc pages; the PSAC owned land around Victoria, also, and kept on functioning as a corporate entity there even after the founding of the Colony of Vancouver Island (1849). If you're a student, you might want to ask your librarian to use interlibrary loan to get the British Columbia Chronicle by Helen B. Akrigg and G.P.V. Akrigg, Discovery Press, Vancouver, and read both volumes cover to cover, although for pre-colonial history only Vol. 1 need apply. Also recommended just as a great read, but also involving cross-border territorial/colonial politics, is D. Hauka's McGowan's War (cf. McGowan's War) and Okanagan Trail.. Skookum1 20:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Fort William

Congratulations on your excellent work on Fort William (Oregon). Please could you look at Henry H. Spalding? - there is an ambiguous link to Fort William you might be able to help with. Thank you CarolGray 17:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Brilliant - thank you very much. CarolGray 07:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi.

There is a user who posted nasty stuff in the Oregon Country: talk page - Skookum1 - I'm sure you remember him... (sigh) who is part of a contingency of Canadians who are doing personal attacks, deleting my edits, and generally making a hard time for any perspective on any pages that there is Canadian/American content on (I was actually surprised to accidentally run into his spat with you and his totally disrespectful exchanges with you). But it makes sense that he is having spats with others on other pages, as he has been one of a couple people that has started a full blown attack on me. I would appreciate some help (or advice) in stopping "these people" (there are a handful of them that associate with him) from their constant harassment of me (including the fact that they are enlisting Canadian big guns to try to threaten me or get me blocked). I mean, don't you get SICK of it? It's borderline psychotic if not totally retarded behavior. Thanks. A fellow American who is fed up. - Donteatyellowsnow 03:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I posted this on my page. But I'll post it here in case you aren't looking there:

Thank you so much! (sigh) That is exactly what I HAVE been doing (what you are suggesting), but he and his buddies have gotten so brazen that they just delete anything I add and even if I make laborious citations (i.e. every single sentence!) And yet when I have questioned their sources (some of which are actually entitled "Useless Facts" when you click on the Internet link) then they DO NOTHING. It's too funny, but not... because these people are a pain in the neck to deal with. - Donteatyellowsnow 04:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Ironically Donteatyellow is the only one who has been blocked by Wikipedia out of all in this so called 'contingency'. Take a look at my User:Langara College history to see vandalism done by him as well as an automated complete index of warnings given to Donteatyellow on his time at Wikipedia. Most of his citations don't even cite the statements or words he's using them for and naturally they're deleted as most cases they're heavily biased for example "Canadians have self titled themselves Hollywood North" etc. Langara College 02:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Imbrie Farm

Hey AM, I'd like to direct your attention to this post on my talk page. Also be looking for an e-mail from me. Continued thanks for your hard work and grace under pressure! Katr67 18:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

citations, and constitution

No problem, glad you noticed! I've become a bit obsessed with improving citations…good citations make it so much easier for one editor to build on another's work.

Also, I was going to ask you - can you take a look at Oregon Constitution sometime? Seems pretty sub-standard for such an important topic. But I don't know nearly enough about the thing to jump in and start editing. Keep up the good work… -Pete 07:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Hollywood

Thanks for the note. I am sorry if I suggested that you considered the matter canvassing because I realize that you did not. And I don't think that I will use that word again in relation to this episode. The post that I wrote before I saw your response to DEYS called his actions "recruiting" but I though as a plain English word, canvassing sounded milder. In any event, I was pretty specific about what was wrong with DEYS actions and that it had nothing to do with WP:CANVAS. He invited an editor to come to his dispute with Skookum1 on the basis of their supposed enmity towards him. He did that twice before your message to him, which advised he e-mail instead and he certainly e-mailed at least one more user. As I said, this is the worst behaviour that I have seen from a legitimate user in my year and a half with the project. And DEYS maintains that he did nothing wrong. His response, besides "he got me fist" was that he came across the users by accident, as though that was the problem.

I agree with you that some of the other users have made troublesome comments. I did say something to Skookum1 because his behaviour was not acceptable, although he already knew it. I do often tell other users to mind the civility if I think that they are uninformed or unaware. I had considered saying something when the excessive warnings were being posted on his talk page. Ultimately I didn’t because I thought that DEYS would take it is message that his actions were acceptable and the others were not. He seems to see WP as a zero-sum experience. But I probably should have said something and I probably will. Thanks. --JGGardiner 21:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I should note, that my mention of a third e-mailed request by DEYS was mistaken. DEYS had merely assumed that an editor contacting him wanted to talk about the issue. I mistook his response to a perceived solicitation to be a solicitation of its own. Sorry about that. --JGGardiner 22:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the note AM. Actually I think that your involvement has been quite helpful. I remember I gave DEYS some friendly advice early on about getting stuck in a rut and I think all of the users at HN have been. Sometimes after a while it is hard to see the forest beyond the trees and it helps to have an "outside" user remind you of the basics. If you want to contribute to the article or the discussion in the future, I'd certainly be happy to have your input. Sometimes it is better to be in up to your ankles than up to your elbows. --JGGardiner 05:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Category:Oregon historic ships

Should Peter Iredale (ship) go in there? Katr67 16:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

For the barnstar! Katr67 05:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

barnstar - cool, thanks!

Ditto, thanks for the barnstar - and especially for a "hand-crafted" one! You're due for one yourself, but I'll have to get creative to avoid an appearance of quid-pro-quo ;) -Pete 19:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Psst. I gave AM an "Exceptional Newcomer Award" once, but he hid it in his archives. :) Katr67 20:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I've seen your busy work. I made the new one for WP:WPOR so we can have something to reward/encourage so we don't lose too many people. So pass it along if you see others in the project doing good work. Plus I think you might have better editing software where you might be able to make it look like the gold pioneer is holding the barnstar by a ribbon or something. If you have time/feel like it. I have a few Oregon pages on my watchlist, but I don't get too much into the government and transportation areas, and I'm sure there are people doing good work there. Aboutmovies 20:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Precious few of us, I'm afraid. Over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon/Government there are only 3 of us not on "wikibreak," and I haven't seen a whole lot of edits from others recently - though there are a few good ones. But you're right, a localized barnstar is a good way to keep people around - I'll try to share the love! -Pete 23:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:NathanielWyeth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NathanielWyeth.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

COI

I see we're not getting anywhere in the lattice discussion. I nominated the article for deletion since it stagnated as a wikispam article for far too long. If the people who know [or can cite] things about the company didn't want to clean the article up it shouldn't have stayed the way it was, hence the AfD.

Oddly enough, after the AfD the article was cleaned up. It wasn't the right way to go about promoting change, and for that I apologize. But I won't stand for some lame argument that I have a COI against anyone in my field. I find it insulting that you question my objectivity or purpose. The only thing that went through my head when I read the article as it was, was "this is spam." not "omg I gotsta destroy mein enemies!"

Eitherway, if it's Wiki policy not to edit articles in your field, I guess I'll go vandalize articles about banana board surfing or something. Unless you can cite revisions I've made to articles of "competitors" or otherwise, that show a bias or tendency to vandalize articles because of a COI I think you should stop insulting me with your vague tones. Just because we work in related fields (Lattice makes FPGAs, we just use them) doesn't mean I can't be objective, and even though you can label it with a wiki COI doesn't mean the revisions are specifically inappropriate (although I agree the AfD was, the ends don't justify the means, but one bad edit doesn't a vandal make).

Tomstdenis 12:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 10 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William P. Bryant, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 09:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

On 9 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Ingraham, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Infobox Judge for Oregon Supreme Court

An appointer field has been added. I will go back through the articles and update the infoboxes. --PhantomS 05:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

By the way, you might want to update Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon/People. --PhantomS 05:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:WUGarden.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:WUGarden.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The Waller Hall pic

Looks awesome! Katr67 04:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Nice job with Judge Goodwin

Try your magic on Judge John Kilkenny - NYC JD (interrogatories) 20:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I like your style. Pleasure to meet you. - NYC JD (interrogatories) 18:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Olympia Vernon

I reverted your edit (made several months ago) adding Olympia Vernon to list of University of Mississippi alumni. She did not attend; her father did. Ward3001 21:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

court case citation

Hi, can you tell me how to properly format the citation of the summary of court activity surrounding Oregon Ballot Measure 7 (2000)? (It's the first citation in the refs section.) Thanks! -Pete 02:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of that, and for the offer to use your database access in the future. Maybe you can help me understand the lay of the land a little better: that thing that's linked to, is it properly called the "court case?" It seems (to my layman eyes) a little different from opinions I've seen published on other cases, in that it provides a lot of context and procedural background. Is this something that's prepared for all cases, or only those that are of broad public interest? -Pete 19:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 25 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hallie Ford Museum of Art, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 23:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Thomas H. Tongue

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Aboutmovies! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Buzz off you stupid bot! -Pete 19:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)