Jump to content

User talk:Adamantine123/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome

Hello, Heba Aisha, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! –CaroleHenson (talk) 09:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

June 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Vanamonde93. An edit that you recently made to Godhra train burning seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vanamonde (Talk) 16:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Yeah true i was testing. @Vanamonde93:

Sorry Heba Aisha (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paswan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhojpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bhumi Sena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jahanabad
Koeri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Persian
Upendra Kushwaha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vaishali

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

I am also a Bihari and I am happy that you are doing good for us. Amrapahal Pahanswan (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Sister, I have published article on Jagdanand Singh giving a citation by The Economics Times describing his caste，political affluence, till it was deleted. Amrapahal Pahanswan (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

  • This is because you copied the whole material from source u listed there.Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously.So you need to write in ur own words.Second ... caste of a living person can be told only if in the source they say themselves that they belong to that particular caste group.If this is not done it amounts to WP:BLP violation.Also you should not use words like great, excellent, extraordinary etc as one of Wikipedia policy called WP:Puffery and WP:POV tells us to maintain neutrality while writing an article.Start once again that article. ...good luck. Heba Aisha (talk) 08:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lalu Prasad Yadav, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toddy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vijay Kumar Shukla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dalelchak-Bhagaura Massacre 1987
added a link pointing to The Telegraph
Durvasa
added a link pointing to Deva

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Majority of People who use " Yadav " surname in Haryana are " Ahirs" only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I have added another source that clearly mentions " 114 were Ahirs" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Anyways I have removed the Rezang La section for now. I have also removed the image as there was no image before.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I have removed picture.There was no picture in past and I don't think its important to have image of particular individual in this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Picture of Ahir King Rao Tula Ram was added . Then someone changed it and added picture of some Individual based on British Raj records. Its better not to have any image here. If you wanna include it , please tell why its necessary.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

And I am not sure which one is added first . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Peasants and Monks in British India, William R. Pinch

Dear Sis, You are doing awesome work on Wikipedia. congrats! BTW, I noticed you used Peasants and Monks in British India by William R. Pinch at several places.It is freely available here. Please see https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft22900465 Also, for some "pure shudra" castes in early 1800s , please see https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft22900465&chunk.id=s1.2.11&toc.depth=1&toc.id=ch2 See "Buchanan, in the early nineteenth century, had included in the term “pure shudra” the well-known designations of Kayasth, Koiri, Kurmi, Kahar, Goala, Dhanuk (archers, cultivators, palanquin bearers), Halwai (sweets vendor), Mali (flower gardener), Barai (cultivator and vendor of betel-leaf), Sonar (goldsmith), Kandu (grain parcher), and Gareri (blanket weavers and shepherds).[108]". If you click on the number 108, you will notice that he is talking about Bihar and Patna only. 108. Buchanan, Bihar and Patna, 1811–1812, 1:329–39; Martin, Eastern India, 2:466–70. Buchanan notes that in Gorakhpur both Halwais and Kandus were included as Vaishyas and thus considered twice-born (Martin, Eastern India, 2:465). Also, that chapter refers to North India only. Hence as a general suggestion, we need to be careful before generalizing and need to qualify these groups with "Bihar/Patna" as they may be under different classification elsewhere whenever we use this chapter. As an example, this may not apply to same caste names from other states. For example, Sonar in Maharashtra came from Brahmins and were called Daivadnya Brahmins - and they had thread ceremonies too. I was looking at some of your recent edits and noticed that you were generalizing this statement for disparate groups on some pages. Hence the suggestion. Hope the link helps. Best Regards,LukeEmily (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

  • well thanks..... i will see sources you share.....i Am sick of people trying to glorify caste by removing images etc etc. My edits are on the basis of few books i have read on Bihar's caste and polity which i use in almost all edits.I will see these sources too.ThanksHeba Aisha (talk) 23:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
You mentioned some editors do not like SUNY press which is an academic press hence I was surprised. Do you know any instances where they have reverted edits from SUNY press? The authors of SUNY press are usually well known scholars.LukeEmily (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

AWARD for you

The Curator Barnstar
I have seen your recent activities.YOU have improved many caste articles by putting suitable images which are generally hard to find.SO you deserve it.CONGO 106.67.90.215 (talk) 02:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

I didn't knew that....adding images brings dis 😀Heba Aisha (talk) 02:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Heba, thank you for your edits

My respects to the superior knowledge that you have attained over the years. Thanks for contributing to wikipedia. I saw your recent edits of Kayastha page. You have added a few theories that claim that Bhumihar and Kayastha of Bihar are Shudra. You probably do understand that these contentions have been debated for ages and both these groups have proved beyond doubt their high ritual status in religious as well as legal courts. Nevertheless the contention did exist and you are welcome to add the same to the page. But to be fair, the other side of the contention should also be fairly added. The decision of Banaras pandits regarding these may be impartiality added.

As per Padma Purana, Bhavishya Purana and the decision of Banaras Pandits in the year 1779 AD on varna status of various sub-groups of Kayastha, they are considered to be Brahmins.[1]

Add the same to Varna/classification section of the page, if you find it useful and relevant. Thanks in advance. I hope you continue the good work. 

Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • @Vikram Q1W2: Hi first of all thanks for saying all this.But,after talking with the senior editors on Wikipedia like Sitush and Utcursch(He is an administrator) i came to know that pre independence era sources on caste related pages are not considered neutral sources as for example: Todd used to write about Rajputs and most of the later historians recognise him as biased author.Same is the case with various communities as those who were close to Britishers due to various reasons tried to prove their higher status and upward mobilisation was evident.As for example: The Kushwaha community, they are also shudra but they tried to assume kshatriya status due to their closeness to the british provided their role in opium production.

If you have doubt then you can ask the above two editors i mentioned or can discuss on Wikipedia india related page discussion forum.If i add they will revert it sooner or later as source you provided is of period before 1947.Heba Aisha (talk) 09:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

No issues, I can provide you a post-1947 book which refers to this letter. Will that help you be impartial? Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes it is a standard book. Milton Israel’s book of 1987 refers to this translation of Gupte of 1779 AD letter of Banaras Pandits to Peshwa Darbar.[2] Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

On the other hand, as per Padma Purana, Bhavishya Purana and the decision of Banaras Pandits in the year 1779 AD on varna status of various sub-groups of Kayastha, they are considered to be Brahmins.[3][4]

Add the same to Varna/classification section of the Kayastha page. Thanks in advance. I hope you continue the good work. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 10:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

I can't see these sources- anywhere on Kayastha page nor in the reference list. Which page are you looking at? Even if they are there reformatting may be done, since new regional sources have been recently added by you. In my opinion, the above mentioned statement with sources may be added before or after your additions, to present the complete contention. Hope you appreciate the concern. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

  • source 23 is the book of the same author.second I can't write in exactly same way i.e Descision of banaras pundits it will be the violation of WP:POV.Also i am sure padma purana and other purana as verification will not be liked by senior editors so i don't want my edits to be reverted.see for edample Kudumbar article.Here also people who were concerned wrote a lot of good things and Sitush reverted all those things in such a manner that now nothing is there.check the history of that article. YOU shud pray that they don't examine Srivastava article. I doubt they can do similar thing with that too.So chill as some of the sentence still write Kayastha as brahmins.You just glance through their edit history you will know which type of sources they don't wantHeba Aisha (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • see these edits https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/963210376

■https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/963210741

Hey bro, let me give it to you straight, you should pray that your impersonation as a women or a muslim to spread caste and religion based hatred is not discovered soon. The trick that you are trying here has been played for too long on youtube and other platforms. See you after Bihar elections. Till then. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

●■No personal commentsHeba Aisha (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

●■Also for your allegations see WP:NotcensoredHeba Aisha (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Gupte, TV. "Appendix I.(page 7)". Translation of 1779 AD letter of Banaras Pandits to Peshwa Darbar regarding varna status of various Kayastha sub-groups. p. 8. "Kayasthas are said to be of three sorts (kinds)— (1) the Chitragupta Kayasthas (2) Dhalbhaga Gatri Kshatriya Kayasthas and (3) Kayasthas of the mixed blood. The origin of Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthas is given in the Puranas. He was born from the body of Brahma while he was contemplating how he should know the good and evil acts of living beings. He was a brilliant person with pen and ink in his hands. He was known as Chitragupta and was placed near the God of death. He was appointed to record the good and evil acts of men. He was a Brahmin possessed of supra sensible knowledge. He was a god sharing the offerings at sacrifices. All the Brahmins offer him oblations of rice before taking their meals. He is called Kayastha because of his origin from the body of Brahma. Many descendants of his bearing different Gotras still exist on this earth. From this it will be seen that Kayastha Brahmins of Karhada and Khandesha are the Brahma-Kayasthas. Now about the origin of Chandraseniya Kshatriya Kayastha
  2. ^ Milton Israel and N.K.Wagle, ed. (1987). Religion and Society in Maharashtra. Center for South Asian Studies, University of Toronto, Canada. p. 173.
  3. ^ Gupte, TV. "Appendix I.(page 7)". Translation of 1779 AD letter of Banaras Pandits to Peshwa Darbar regarding varna status of various Kayastha sub-groups. p. 8. "Kayasthas are said to be of three sorts (kinds)— (1) the Chitragupta Kayasthas (2) Dhalbhaga Gatri Kshatriya Kayasthas and (3) Kayasthas of the mixed blood. The origin of Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthas is given in the Puranas. He was born from the body of Brahma while he was contemplating how he should know the good and evil acts of living beings. He was a brilliant person with pen and ink in his hands. He was known as Chitragupta and was placed near the God of death. He was appointed to record the good and evil acts of men. He was a Brahmin possessed of supra sensible knowledge. He was a god sharing the offerings at sacrifices. All the Brahmins offer him oblations of rice before taking their meals. He is called Kayastha because of his origin from the body of Brahma. Many descendants of his bearing different Gotras still exist on this earth. From this it will be seen that Kayastha Brahmins of Karhada and Khandesha are the Brahma-Kayasthas. Now about the origin of Chandraseniya Kshatriya Kayastha
  4. ^ Milton Israel and N.K.Wagle, ed. (1987). Religion and Society in Maharashtra. Center for South Asian Studies, University of Toronto, Canada. p. 173.

This is for you

The Special Barnstar
Hi this is for writing about Kushwaha community.You helped to bring it to the world that community is not irrelevant as the article portrayed earlier lest you edited it.I am thankful to you for this but hope that the shudra status should be changed as we are not shudra.Thanks 2402:8100:3A07:C5D6:0:0:1F8D:483B (talk) 03:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I m sorry if you find it offensive but this is an Encyclopedia and we write what is true.What you are saying and for the purpose you are here is not new.See above a person had same problem as of yours and now he's here with another account to revert all my edits.Hope you not take it in another way.RegardsHeba Aisha (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Firstly, because you thanked my edit. Secondly, you seem to be doing a nice work here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep doing the good work and keep discussing with the Wikipedia community whenever you get confused over something. You'll get more of these barnstars and 'gifts'. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
I reported them. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Restore your edits. But add proper sources like Kamangiri art article, which is unsourced. Secondly, do not make changes on gut feeling like you did here. Change content using source or consult people like Sitush who are well versed in caste/tribe related topics. Sheeba Asia got blocked/indefed See Here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanku....i was about to add refrence to the article but that message really disturbed me.Btw he was not due to image at Dhangar article.I never add anything without source.Is it possible that someone can misuse my account in the same way.How to protect future redirects..?I m not much techno savy....let me confess.Heba Aisha (talk) 10:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

The new one also got blocked. They may try again. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

What to do?Heba Aisha (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Ms.Heba Aisha I don't mean to snoop on your private conversation with Mr.Fylindfotberserk but you can use Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism and Wikipedia:Requests_for_administrator_attention. LukeEmily (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
There is another, relevant for this kind of troll WP:UAA. Thanks LukeEmily. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Nice. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

only for you

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I have been following your edits and your hard work certainly deserves a lot of praise.

LukeEmily (talk) 12:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


Battle of Maonda

Please check the article Battle of Maonda and Mandholi. There seems to be a lot of changes and removal of trusted sources like Jadunath Sarkar with personal remarks. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:387E:59A6:1:0:54A3:1926 (talk) 05:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please check I have written in my own words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3853:2302:1:0:54E7:55F1 (talk) 06:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jawahar Singh
added links pointing to Mandoli and Bharatpur
Battle of Maonda and Mandholi
added a link pointing to Mandoli

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


(Hangsun.576 (talk) 09:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC))

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jawahar Singh
added links pointing to Mandoli and Bharatpur
Rajput
added a link pointing to Chhau

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

User:LukeSmily

This user left a message on my talk page and your talk page suspecting we are sockpuppets. Interestingly, it happened seconds after I replied on the Rajput page supporting that image you supported. Maybe some admin should intervene and see who LukeSmily is. Obviously, he is after me based on his name. LukeEmily (talk) 19:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Few editing tips

Hello, Heba Aisha. Please don't move any other talk page comment as that will create further confusion. You should use a colon (see WP:Indentation) to reply to a comment rather than using an asterisk mark. Also, one should provide diffs rather copy-pasting whole comments of other editors – please see WP:Diff.

Finally, an article's talk page is meant for discussing things related to the improvement of that article. So other article or general behaviour of users should not be discussed there – please see WP:TPG. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 11:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok....Btw plz open sockpuppetry investigation against Sajaypal007 he is making personal attacks on me by making fake accounts like LukeSmily and Lukhiba.I m busy elsewhere.TqHeba Aisha (talk) 11:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

An SPI case can only be opened if there is behavioural evidence between the accounts. I don't think Sajaypal007 is connected to those sockpuppets. So there is no need to open an SPI. BTW, please ignore these sockpuppets and vandals. - NitinMlk (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok thank uHeba Aisha (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

About the photo you added on the Meenas wiki page

Why you have added a photo with the caption "Meenas, Hindoos of low caste, vagrants, Delhi."?

1. if the source is old does not mean it is correct or reviewed work. How a photo dated -1868 - 1875 is relevant? We are in 2020, do Meenas still live and are vagrants? Do you know how many divisions are there within Meena tribe?

2. Meenas are not natives of Delhi, as photo caption is stating.

3. Meenas in Rajasthan come under tribe, NOT a CASTE and do not fall under Hindu cast systems, hence, no point in stating low or hight cast.

So, the photo and caption are misleading and do not represent the correct status of Meenas. So, please remove it or find a photo represents Meenas in factual terms. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.242.49.5 (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

A few photos of Meena/Mina tribe: 1822 to 1890s..to replace the current photo from Meenas wiki page.

Plz upload on wikimedia commons. I will surely replace. Images are good.Heba Aisha (talk) 00:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

GeneralNotability (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of Patna
added a link pointing to Licchavi
National Highways Authority of India
added a link pointing to National Highway

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Content about racist views of Richard Nixon for indians was removed

Declassified documents from the Richard Nixon Presidential Library show that Nixon held deeply racist views for the Indian people and sexual hatred for Indian Women as revealed by author Gary J. Bass. [1]Describing Indian women as "undoubtedly" the most unattractive women in the world. Also describing Indian people as the most "sexless" and "nothing" people in the world . At one point comparing indian people with "African blacks " , stating that atleast they have an "animallike charm" but the Indians were "ack, pathetic" . [1]

This content is sourced from a recent article in the NYT but it was still removed . Could you have a look ? Meethamonkey (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok i got it .....will see when get time.Heba Aisha (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ a b Bass, Gary J. (2020-09-03). "Opinion | The Terrible Cost of Presidential Racism". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-09-05.

Hi

Regarding the removal of content from talk page, I did remove only two discussion, both were related to you. You put fake warning of edit war and block. Edit war is considered when you make atleast 3 reverts within 24 hrs. And that was not that. I see you also removed such fake warnings from your page put up by someone and its ok. Because they were fake warnings. You can remove this discussion too if you wish. And for Rajput page, I again ask you to keep the discussion short and relevant to the matter. Other matters if you want to discuss then create separate discussion page for that. @Kautilya3 I believe has not much time in hand so try to keep it comprehensible. Thanks. Sajaypal007 (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

I will post some comments on the Talk:Rajputs page. Both of you need to keep the discussion focused on the content, and avoid all conduct-related discussions. Conduct can be discussed on User talk pages, if need be. But most of the time, it is not productive to do so.
Edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions [1]. 3 reverts is called the bright red line, after which you will get automatically blocked. But edit-warring begins at the second revert itself. So, only one revert is normally permissible, that too with well-justified, policy-based reasons. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Coastal Regulation Zone
added links pointing to Creek and Backwater
Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare
added a link pointing to Economic Times
Reserve Bank of India
added a link pointing to Economic Times
Tribal Co-operative Marketing Federation of India (TRIFED)
added a link pointing to Raigad

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, regarding your constant following of my edits

If you don't mind I think I feel like you are following my edits and then try to edit that and related pages. For singular incident I think it wont be any problem, but lately I am feeling that for every history related article i edit you will reach there and edit it. It feels like I am being watched everytime. It may also lead to some conflict if you continouosly edit after my edits where you earlier never edited. We already have our differences in other articles and if you keep on doing this, we may get other conflicts on some other pages, I request you to not do such things. You never in your edit history ever touched those articles ever, you even had little knowledge about the subject, (by look of that talk page), nonetheless as soon as I edited that you will reach on that page and edit it alongwith other related pages. This may amount to Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding, so I will suggest you refrain from such acts in future. Sajaypal007 (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Plz i just corrected citation and didn't touch even a word on the article.And anyone can improve any article.Harrassment happens when anyone tries to inhibit other but instead i m supporting ur edits in the articles.Heba Aisha (talk) 08:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Please read the rule carefully. To quote a part, "Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions." Your constant following is causing distress for me. History of Rajasthan is my field of interest, I have never seen you editing anything related to Rajasthan history before our confrontation, even today you got confused Chunda of Mewar with Chunda of Marwar, it says how much you know about the subject. Anyway my point is please do not follow my edits, there are different ways to cite sources, mine is different from yours. And also in don't create multiple discussion, I asked you here, you should reply here instead of going over my talk page and replying half of the answer there. I don't have so much free time in mind end as you do and can't discuss on multiple fronts. So please request you not to follow my edits. You have been doing that since last month after Rajput origin controversy. I never follow your edits or make edits on your interest pages after you edit them. Last time I am requesting you to not follow my edits, it cause constant distress and inhibit my ability to work freely on wikipedia. I hope you understand that. Thank you in advance. Sajaypal007 (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok not follow ur edits but history is my field of interest and it is possible that i could edit other articles related to Rajasthani history.And you may not feel problem for that.Heba Aisha (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Sajaypal007, (talk page stalker) I dont think that this user is hounding your edits in a bad cause. According to the information page Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended.. As the user said that he/she only corrected citations (fixed unambiguous errors), therefore it isn't prohibited. If the user is really watching your edits in a good cause then it's permitted. In the start, my edits were also watched by some users, but that helped me to learn more and find my errors. Being watched by users, made me more attentive. Soon, they left watching my edits when I didn't react to them. However, I'll also suggest this user to keep the discussion at single place, not to make it scattered. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 11:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank u Empire AS.....Yar see he just edited Lakha Singh...Yes i visited there to see his edit history....but soon i found requirement of edits in other articles too....so i edited Mokal Singh and created a new article Chunda Sisodia too......i m not strictly bound to an article but working on a number of articles and number of subjects.Heba Aisha (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
It's right to follow any user's edits in a good cause like correcting errors and problem as stated above. But not the contributions be followed for disruption or personal attacks. As I see, you just expanded refs and corrected grammar. So, I wouldn't say it harassment. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 12:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
You don't know our dispute history. Our dispute is still going on another page. Also this is not first time, she edited some other articles after me and not for fixing my errors. It happened many a times while we are already in dispute on a page. Regarding that you should read the policy which I quoted verbatim above. Good faith edits can be considered as harrasment if you are constantly doing that, and that too with a guy you have been in a dispute. And I already asked her to not do that it is inhibiting my working on wikipedia and making the environment here distressful. Also I my citation style is different, its not like there is a necessity to link google books, its not a wikipedia rule. So I didn't commit any mistake at all. If she want link google books in wikipedia there are thousands of links she can work on. @HebaAisha I am again asking you to please stop this.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doctor and Rabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Heba

Hi Heba, Thanks for that badge. Best Regards. LukeEmily (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

welcome....keep doing good edits and i will be updating ur badge as per number of edits and days passed on wiki.Heba Aisha (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Please may I request you and NitinMlk to participate in the Rajput talk page discussion? Thanks LukeEmily (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Service awards

Hi, I saw that you are using {{Apprentice Editor}} on your user page. However, I'll suggest you to use the Template:Service awards. It will automatically upgrade your awards. What you need to do is to just update your edits. It's just a suggestion otherwise you are using the award template that is right too. See my awards page. Hope it works. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 01:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks.... i m learning various features of wikipedia slowly slowly.Btw thanks for suggesting.Heba Aisha (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Great, However you indented your reply multiple times. Just increase one colon (:) before your every post. See WP:INDENT for more. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 09:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Thnaks...now did as you advised.Heba Aisha (talk) 12:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
😀. I got confused! Empire AS Talk! 12:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
In my last comment i indented in the way u advised.Heba Aisha (talk) 01:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
May be. But I don't see that. Now, in your latest reply to me, the indentation again went wrong. Just increase only 1 colon (:) than the previous reply. You'll learn that soon. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 04:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
okHeba Aisha (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
A cookie for your hardwork and good contributes. Wpedia User (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Violence against animals in India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence against animals in India, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against animals in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malwa Sultanate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Kurmi

If you see that kind of edit on "Awadhiya" next time, kindly revert it. Obviously a sock of Prakash Baghel Raj. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok...i will.Heba Aisha (talk) 07:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Hindi sources

I've reverted your edits at Seema Samridhi and restored all the sources you had removed with the edit summary that these sources are in Hindi and add nothing. It would've been better to raise the issue on article's talk page. Hindi sources are as much reliable as those in English. Regards. ─ The Aafī (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

2020 Hathras gang rape and murder Twitter Sources

Hi Heba, I saw that you removed the twitter citations from the article saying "Twitter shouldnt be used....need a reliable source". I added those citations, they are reliable because all 3 of them were from official Twitter accounts of Agra Police, IPRD and District Magistrate. I read WP:TWITTER and the citations all match the criteria in there, so I think they should be kept up. Also, the replaced citation of the news article doesn't show these tweets mentioned. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so please do point the right way :)

Here's the link to the diff : https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2020_Hathras_gang_rape_and_murder&diff=981436494&oldid=981436311&diffmode=source

- Subins2000 (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Subins2000 hi its ok. It was not necessary though. As i have added news source.see.Heba Aisha (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Heba_Aisha Thank you. That news article doesn't show these official tweets though. These additional tweets would make the citation stronger. I shall add it once again Subins2000 (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Go ahead best of luck.Heba Aisha (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mallaah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaishali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kushwaha
added links pointing to Rohtas and Bhojpur
Vritra
added a link pointing to Danava

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satyadev Kushwaha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bokaro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Seema Samridhi, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Help me

I have been trying to make changes in Udal of Mahoba, Alha and Banaphar since few days, but obviously English administrators cannot understand Hindi language, that's why I need help of any administrator who understands hindi language. So can you please help me. If you can than please see my reliable sources for making changes in Talk:Udal of Mahoba Sumit banaphar (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

In case sources are reliable and are in hindi there is rule to give translation of it in quote.Then it will be accepted. Heba Aisha (talk) 13:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I meant to say that, can you check the sources i provide in Talk:Udal of Mahoba.If you are interested or not busy.Sumit banaphar (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Vaani publishers.....it will be difficult for english wikipedia to accept this source. Because many users in past tried to expand some articles with such sources but were reverted by the senior editors.Heba Aisha (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I just want your opinions about what the source are saying which i provide to make changes in Talk:Udal of MahobaSumit banaphar (talk) 08:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali!

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
🪔Never expected this on wikipedia thank u Mr. Fylindfotberserk and same to u.🪔Heba Aisha (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Why not? We celebrate everything. Welcome . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

.🪔HappyDeepawali🪔May this festival bring peace and blessings to you and your family • .💠245CMR💠.•👥📜 10:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks 245CMR👍👍Heba Aisha (talk) 11:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shakuni Choudhury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakhanpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

New message from Swadge2

Hello, Adamantine123. You have new messages at Talk:Bhumi Sena.
Message added 10:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Swadge2 (talk) 10:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ChariotRider55

Hi Heba, Hi Heba Aisha, maybe we could rephrase some of Chariotrider555's edits but it seems that at least some of the edits are necessary as the modern opinions apply to *all* Rajput clans. They do not say that there are any exceptions. Many of the western scholars (other than origin section, please see the community formation section on the Rajput page) - are quite explicit in saying that they do not have Kshatriya origin and these lineages were fabricated by Bards as well as the Rajputs themselves. I found two more references from Oxford University Press. But these were not always fabricated by Brahmins. I have seen this promotion issue on Maratha pages too. Since the main Maratha page is under heavy scrutiny, several caste promoters try to add words like Suryavamshi, Kshatriya origin etc. directly to the clan subpages rather than the main page as not many people watch them. I feel that at least something should be added when there is a statement that a certain clan is or claims Suryavanshi etc. and then point the page to origin on the Rajput page. At least one or two lines that modern historians do not agree in general about all Rajput clans. What do you think? I felt like his edits were valid although probably too much detail. In short, unless there is historical evidence that a caste studied vedas at least in the 18th/19th century - it is unlikely that it is twice born irrespective of what they claim. LukeEmily (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok...as u added those details..... You are more knowledgeable in the area. So I asked u.Go aheadHeba Aisha (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Daroga is not part of Rajput community you idiot Luke Emily. Rajputs are the kshatriya as far as Vedic ritual is concerned. The word is synonymous to Kshatriya. This is not based on some bards, Charans as you fool think to be. Rana of Bharat (talk) 07:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

My friend Luke Emily, your questions on Sacred thread and dwija, yes Rajputs used to recite Vedas and wear sacred thread. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=0fmtjbaQPzMC&pg=PA64&dq=rajputs+rulers+vedas+reciting&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiV6LDylpPtAhV-yTgGHYdMDIoQuwUwAXoECAYQBw#v=onepage&q=rajputs%20rulers%20vedas%20reciting&f=false Rana of Bharat (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Ms Heba, when you have lack of knowledge on the subject don't try to be the editor on it. Today anybody is entitled to do what they want like farming, business etc. Do you a large section of brahmin is in agriculture and not very literate ( if you use English educational logic). Rana of Bharat (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion on a page

In the page Rajputization, you have added Daroga, Noniya, Rajgond etc these are not part of the community. They are separate community pls correct it. Ritual imitation doesn't mean a community becomes as such. Rana of Bharat (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

we rely on sources while editing not the personal opinion.Oxford source clearly mention it.Heba Aisha (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Rana of Bharat, please familiariase yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source policy. Any well-sourced content will not be deleted. You can only contest it by bringing sources of equal or better quality.

You do not have to respond to this message, since you are under a topic ban. But you can utilise your off-time better by learning about Wikipedia policies. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Irrelevant image added in Bihari Rajput

How is the image being added by you on Bihari Rajput is relevant to the topic? Is that image verifiable with citation to prove it, explain. Anony20 (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Anony20

Please avoid editorial warring

Hello, please comply with wikipedia policy on edit war and refrain from editing the article jadeja without detailed references. Please add precise quotes from the reference material on the talk page to build consensus about the material and then add it into the article. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing edits, once it is known that there is a disagreement. If you engage in repeated warring you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnlyTruthShallPrevail (talk • contribs) 17:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Don't blank sourced content on articles Heba Aisha (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Heba good to see your are so regular but please be more informative

You added bhumihars to shudra who were always considered high caste even brahmin. I am a kshtriya kushwaha Anirudh Kumar Paswan (talk) 07:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

We realized...as LukeEmily and others have discussed it at the talk page of chariotrider.Heba Aisha (talk) 14:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop deletion

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates, or image from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bihari Rajput, you may be blocked from editing. Anony20 (talk) 07:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

First of all its violation of policy.As you urself said in WP:AE that it represent kunwar singh and his attendants and shouldn't be put on top of caste articles. And you have directly put level 3 warning. Heba Aisha (talk) 11:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

You have marked the media as a duplicate and for speedy deletion, when it's obvious from the caption of your upload that it's an engraving of a photograph(One uploaded by me). Stop personal attack and Revenge Anony20 (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adamantine123/Archive_1&oldid=1249839393"