User talk:Aditya/Archives/Mar/2009

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Aditya. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

New to this

Hi, I set up a wikipedia page that is grammtically incorrect, links aren't linking plus tried to put a photo up of my client but it was taken off. I really don't want to edit wikipedia just tried to help a client. If you would be willing to help it would greatly be appreciated. The page is Daniel DeWeldon. Thanks User:donovanblaze February 24, 2009 (UTC)

Placement of warnings
Hi there - I removed the warning template you placed on User:Joshbiz. Warnings and messages go on the user's talk page, not their userpage. And I had already notified the user of the speedy deletion nomination of their article, on their talk page. Cheers Ka renjc 18:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
No probs :) Glad you've joined us and hope you enjoy it here. If you're intending to help nominate articles for deletion, you'll find WP:Deletion policy helpful to familiarise yourself with the various criteria for speedy and non-speedy deletion proposals. And when on vandalism patrol, be careful about warning users for vandalism you have not fixed yourself - if the reverting editor also warns them they will be templated twice for the same incident, which isn't fair. Best wishes and go easy on Twinkle while you're still finding your way around. Ka renjc 18:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Josh Bisignano
You have PRODded this article but there are two problems with the way you did it:
You didn't provide a reason for deletion

You placed the warning on the user's page, not the associated talk page
Because of the first of these I removed the PROD, not to contest it but merely procedurally. In this case I don't think PROD was the best option available to you anyway; the article was clearly a candidate for speedy deletion or moving to the creating editor's user space.
Ros0709 (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Noimage
The noimage function is for comics articles which do not need or should not have an image. Sanctum Sanctorum is not one of these, so removing that tag is not vandalism. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 15:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
De nada, I always revert that one because people seem to be confused as to its purpose. :) I may get a little mistrust from RC patrollers, but I'm used to it by now. ;) Mostly it's good work you do, and I know anons contribute the bulk of the problem, but not all of us are out to destroy Wikipedia. :) 204.153.84.10 (talk) 15:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I prefer staying anon - I don't need thanks or recognition, I just like doing what I do to help out. Yep, there are a ton of warnings; some are no doubt legit (I make mistakes and bad judgment calls, but who doesn't?), but a bunch of them are things that wouldn't have been reverted if I weren't an anon, since people wouldn't be making the same ASSumptions about my motivations. ;) I'd like to think I get more compliments than complaints overall, but again, I'm not editing for what people will think of me, but how it improves things overall. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
hi
Don't worry Antivenin you're doing fine .... I was encouraging the user. You are quite right to note that his contribution (so far) is below what we expect. Keep it up Victuallers (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi again
See the welcome message ... may help

Prod? Maybe leave that for a bit?

If you are getting feedback then you are doing something. If you don't do anything then you won't get in trouble, but you won't do anthing! Be bold Victuallers (talk) 15:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I looked through your recent changes .... how about some additions? Which was your school? Village? Town? Tell us about it and add some sources? Where are you in India? Victuallers (talk) 15:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Which was your school? Village? Town? ... Find or create the article... if your school has an article then improve it ... if not then find a similar school ... cut and paste the source and then delete or change until it is your school? Then save.. OK? Just a suggestion. Victuallers (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC) I agree your school article is quite poor. I cowrote La Martiniere Lucknow ... you could steal the infobox off that as a start? I would offer help if you needed it Victuallers (talk) 16:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

No context
"No context" means, according to WP:CSD , that there is so little information that one cannot tell what the article is about. If it's clear what it's about, but not enough information to show notability, then that reason for speedy does not apply. The think to do then is to look for more information yourself, or place a notability tag at least. If you look for information and cannot find any, and there is reason to think nobody else is likely to either, then consider PROD or AFD. (or, if it makes no plausible claim or indication for notability at all, and is about a person, group, or company, to place a speedy tag.) But remember that all inhabited places and all secondary schools are essentially always considered notable at AfD. For the details, see WP:Deletion policy. And,as Victuallers says, you might try some article writing too--see our guide to writing Wikipedia articles. DGG (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/September 2008#Antivenin. SoxBot X (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Physicist reversion comments
Hello! Thanks for your vandalism reversion to Physicist!
I wanted to pass along to you, if you look at the history log for Physicist, you'll see that you reverted it to the wrong version of the article. Your reversion ( diff here ) simply brought the article back to another vandalism by the same user. I went back and reverted to the last clean version I could find. (5 edits before yours, I believe. diff from yours to mine)
Also, you dropped the "Only Warning" banner into the IP's talk, when that IP had already received warnings and a "Last Warning." (BUT, that 'Last Warning' had been dropped in the same minute that you made yours by another editor. ;) )
I think what I'm saying is you're doing fine and great! Just be careful with which versions you revert to, and also monitor which banners you drop into a Talk page before dropping them. But hey, we're all learning! ;) LaughingVulcan 15:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
As I understand it (reading WP:UTM,) the Level 4im (Level 5) warn templates are warnings for edits so egregious that there is to be one, and only one, warning. (It's independent of the first/continue/worse/last system, but related to it.) Logic suggests to me that if someone has already racked up a recent Level 4, especially on the same article, then it's time to list them at AIV - no template necessary on their Talk, as they've already been warned. (OTOH, if there hadn't been a recent vandalism note, then Level 4im would have been appropriate. And the first one was probably worth a 4im, but that's a judgment call.)
I think I was a little confused myself by the usage on the Talk page of a Level warning (1?), then the Level 4, followed by your Level 4im for the same article as the level 4. Rethinking the events, I can see how it happened.... At the moment of coming across it (and how it looks just by looking at the Talk now,) though, it reads like the person was warned once (15:07,) was escalated to a final warning (15:10,) and then your edit says it's the "only" warning (also 15:10.) It kind of reads like, "We're going to count to five now to have you stop... 1... 4... 5...." ;)
If the other editor had dropped the Level 4 in and you edit conflicted with them User:Aleenf1 - the way it seems to me - then probably the best thing for you to have done was to go straight to AIV and report the IP. (The IP had already been warned for the vandalism and immediate repeated vandalism.) Which is why paying attention to what changed in an edit conflict is important --- if that's the way it happened.
Actually, the problem would've equally been solved if the other patroller had dropped the 4im on the person and that editor or you reported it to AIV, then.
As problems go, though, this one (wrong template,) was pretty minor. It's also a minor flaw in the RC/Vandal patrol system - multiple people handling the same problem at the same time. (Plus the fact that some of us don't like using Twinkle or other automated tools. ;) ) LaughingVulcan 16:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the compliment! No, not an Admin. Just an editor who reads and uses Wikipedia a lot, plus edits once in awhile. Started editing since mid 2006 as an anon (I think,) and been editing since December '06 as LaughingVulcan. My edit count is well less than a thousand and under 100 Article edits total; that would probably knock me out of the running for Adminship just on the merits of people who think quantity trumps quality, or that you can't tell quality from 600-700 edits, or that my mainspace/otherspace edit ratio isn't good enough for them. Maybe I'm beginning to work towards Adminship, but that's not an immediate goal or focus of mine - I don't think I need the Tools, yet. Let me know when and if you RfA. :) Anyway, best to you! LaughingVulcan 16:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
+Rollbacker
Done per your request. Thanks for responding to my query. Make sure you read WP:ROLLBACK before using the tool, and feel free to ask any questions over at my talk page Fritzpoll (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Reverts
Please stop reverting my edits on Iestyn ap Gwrgant I am adding his coat of arms that hardly constitutes vandalism as you have stated.81.111.119.98 (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw this series of reversions as well. Antivenin, could you perhaps explain why you kept reverting it? [ roux ] [x] 18:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Hiya.. don't be silly! The only 'punishment' is you knowing you made an oopsie--which we all do--and trying not to do it again. Also, doesn't look to me like you even used rollback to make the reverts, so no worries there. It's easy to go really fast with Huggle, but that's how mistakes are made. Just go a bit slower in the future, ok? :) [ roux ] [x] 12:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Reversion to my talk page
Hey. Thanks for reverting this edit to my talk page, but I don't mind having messages from anon editors on my talk page. Even though the editor had previously vandalized several pages, that edit did not constitute vandalism, despite being written in a mocking tone.
I don't mind answering that kind of thing, so unless the edit removes content or is obscenely vulgar, I don't mind having it on my talk page.
Thanks for the gesture anyway :) –QuadrivialMind ^(talk) 07:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Please, it's nothing. You're actively trying to revert vandalism, is that correct? I read on your user page you're a RC patroller. You use Huggle, right? Unless you didn't configure it yourself, Huggle isn't meant to show recent edits on talk pages. However, if you do have that option checked (which I believe you do), you can always tell which ones are talk pages because they always start with talk: or User talk: (maybe you already know this, I'm saying it just in case).
If you knew this but you just failed to notice it when you were reverting, then it was just a simple distraction mistake, which happens to all of us from time to time. And I don't mean to judge or anything (in fact, I commend you for taking up fighting vandalism so enthusiastically!), but you should never try to revert edits too fast. I don't know if you do, but I think many newcomers to fighting vandalism attempt to revert too fast. Just a friendly piece of advice: take a moment before reverting and ask yourself: is this obvious vandalism? is this a user page? a talk page? are you familiar enough with the article name so that you know it's not some newly created page? (I, on occasions, have found myself reverting vandalism on a page that was tagged for sd!).
Also (and I say this because I saw a message you have on your talk page), do look at the end result after you revert. You need to make sure you didn't revert to another vandalized version of the page. In case you don't remember, when you press the Revert & Warn button on Huggle (or, alternatively, the Revert this revision button while viewing the latest revision), all top edits from the last editor in the revision history are reverted. This is something especially important to consider when you find a page that's been vandalized by multiple accounts, which unfortunately, as you probably know, is not very uncommon.
There are a lot of people around to revert vandalism. Do not worry about speed; if you're not sure if something is vandalism, it's better not to revert. See the page for yourself from a browser rather than the Huggle interface (which, let's admit, can be a bit confusing sometimes), check the page history, check the contributions of the user who made the (top) edits which you are considering reverting, or just wait for another more experienced user to come by. Edit count is not really an important thing, it's better to make fewer edits if you know you're doing them right. However, also keep in mind any mistakes you make can be reverted, so it's no biggie if you mess up here and there—we're all human (Well, almost all).
It's great that you're so eager to fight vandalism, but Huggle can be a powerful thing (and rollback privileges can be revoked if you show misuse of them—not saying that you do, just giving you more info) so try to take it easy ;)
If you need any help whatsoever or information about vandalism fighting, don't hesitate to contact me—I am by no means an expert on the subject, but will be glad to help you in any way I can.
Keep up the good work. –QuadrivialMind ^(talk) 08:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
The newest version of Huggle was released very recently, so maybe it was that. I just ran the older version (which was basically what everyone was using like a week ago), and the Options menu is different from the current version. It's probably the default configuration to check for these pages now. In the current version, you can change these options by going to Queue → Manage Queues.... You can configure what to filter there.

About your user page: try adding {{Boxtop}} before your first userbox, and {{Boxbottom}} after your last (I noticed all the codes for your userboxes are cluttered at the beginning of your user page) and preview the results. You can also see other people's user pages you like and copy some pieces of code to your page to preview and see if you can find a layout you are more comfortable with :) –QuadrivialMind ^(talk) 08:49, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi
There was an organized attack, a lot of new users started moving articles around all of them into names like "H..A..G..A..R.." probably sock puppets. I thought I might help a lithe the admins to clean this mess. Did I put the warning in a wrong page? sorry about that. --Maniadis (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Have a look at this thread Special:Contributions/Crix_Madine
--Maniadis (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Addition of unsourced controversial material to Matthew Kelly
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Matthew Kelly. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
(Just for the record-> Replied on DAJF's talk page) Anti venin 13:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Studios Hergé
Why did you deleted this article ? The redirection to Hergé Foundation complies with the guidelines. Can you explain the reasons for the deletion ? --Pah777 (talk) 17:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
The redirection is justified in the talk page of the article. But I am still wondering if it is appropriate. I will speak about the question to a specialist of comics. --Pah777 (talk) 09:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Peer review
Hi there! I was just wondering if you could have a little look over the S Club article which is currently being submitted for peer review. It'd be great if you could spend a minute looking over it. :) Thanks very much, »—Mikay—talk—contribs→ 17:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. That makes me really happy to hear and all the more worth rewriting the article. :D I look forward to reading and responding to issues that you raise. »—Mikay—talk—contribs→ 10:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Bharath
I have a good Source for that, Wait i'll show you in 10 minutes 122.164.24.142 (talk) 07:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

Thanks for defending my talkpage from the 4chan morons, it hasnt gone unnoticed. The reason I dont want my talk page protected is because of moral principals. Looks like they got bored.....for now. Thanks again ! «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 10:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Lincolnshire, Illinois copyedit
Hey, Antivenin.
I saw your name on the volunteers list, and I am working towards preparation of my first FA. Based on a few guides that I have read through, copyediting is a big time must; would you like to help me?
If so, I hope you don't mind me requesting the aid of other copyeditors as well.
Thanks for your time; please get back to me as soon as you can.
--Starstriker7(^{Dime algo}_{or see my works}) 02:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas from Promethean

O'Hai there Aditya/Archives/Mar, Merry Christmas!

Aditya/Archives/Mar,
I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas and that you also have a Happy and safe new year.
Thankyou for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year and I look forward to seeing many more from you in the future.
Your work around Wikipedia has not gone un-noticed, this notice is testimony to that
Please feel free to drop by my talkpage any time to say Hi, as I will probably say Hi back :)

All the Best. «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk)

GG Boyd
Antivenin, thank you for your comments and encouragement.
As I stated on another's critique: I have performed research for nearly 3 decades and have just recently discovered the letters and service records on which this article is based.
Most of my research is Civil War based and like WWII there is not much new to be discovered about the campaigns; people's interest, at least in the case of the Civil War, is in the men who fought. I don't know whether G. G. Boyd was a "pretty good man" as you point out, but do know that the people he took to war and brought home safely thought him a hero.
If the criterion is "notable" and Google is the arbiter for that, you should go ahead and delete the article now. GG Boyd was not published and except for him being listed on Wikipedia as the original captain of the USS Nemasket and documented in the US Naval archives, he is not by Google's definition, notable.
Coincidentally, I have reviewed many of the articles that have a similar "delete" indictments. I don't envy your "gate-keeper" role and clearly (to me, at least) some should be rejected. At this stage I'd be interested in your thoughts for improving the article, and if there are none would recommend that you delete the article. Cpboyd (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Fellow de-orphaner!

I noticed you added your name to the list of participants in WikiProject Orphanage. We really appreciate your help! The first things you could do to get started with us are:

Read the Wikipedia:WikiProject Orphanage page, especially the section marked "Criteria". The page contains a lot of good advice to get you started, as well as the standard procedures we are using to de-orphan articles.

Look at {{orphan}}, {{do-attempt}}, and {{articleissues}} closely and make sure you know how to use them correctly. (It's not difficult, but it is easy to screw up. Trust me, I have.)

Keep de-orphaning! Category:Orphaned articles contains all orphaned articles organized by month. Right now we're just trying to keep up with all the new orphans being created, so please start with the current monthly category. Once those are cleared out, we can start working on the backlog in reverse-chronological order.
Of course, you may have already known all of this, in which case sorry for the spam. Either way, let me know if there's any way I can help you contribute more to the project!
Aervanath (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey! Thanks for the info. I'm sporadically active during this month, so I might not be able to help as much as could be expected of me. Just an article or two everyday (this month). I deorphaned my first article just now. So cool. =P I didn't know WP:O existed till recently. I'm looking for other ways I can help too. AfD seems cool, as does Editor Review. I've spent too much time on anti-vandalism. Any suggestions? (Maintenance only =/ ) Anti venin 18:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Re:Miss Nepal
Hi Antivenin, now that you bring it to my attention that 90.195.181.221 has made such a number of edits, I have reviewed the differences between versions and it seems that 90.195.181.221's edits have been constructive. I have restored the page to the version before I reverted 90.195.181.221. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. - Fastily (talk) 07:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar

I award you, Antivenin, The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar, for your friendliness in correcting my edit and in welcoming User:90.195.181.221! Keep up the great work!!! Fastily (talk) 07:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for the Barnstar, and keep the great anti-vandalism work. --Odie5533 (talk) 09:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
No Problem
My pleasure, cheers Spitfire^Tally-ho! 12:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
download's special barnstar

down load's special barnstar

Thanks for signing my guestbook! Reading things carefully is a skill more people should have. -down load | sign! 22:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Cookie!

download has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

-down load | sign! 02:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
RE:Thanks
No problem! And when I say I've had edit conflicts with you, I mean anti-vandalism in general (though sometimes Huggle) :P Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 12:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
like this one :P Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 13:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Nah, I sometimes use Huggle-now, I'm on a public server, so I don't. See you later (g2g) Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 13:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
NPW

Hi, Aditya/Archives/Mar. I have granted you NPWatcher per your request here. After looking over a few of your contributions, your talk page, and your block log, I feel you can be trusted with the tool. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Good luck, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Doknić
Since the Macedonian First League is the highest professional league in Macedonia, I'm wondering why it got nominated for deletion. Playing for the highest professional league of a country is specifically included in ATHLETE guidelines, so why do you and so many others say it doesn't meet those guidelines? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Your interpretation doesn't take the first bullet point into account which can clearly include sportspeople or teams who play at the "highest professional level" (first or premier league) of a country. That first criterion doesn't make a distinction between national and international sportspeople. Also, "People who have competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships." is obviously faulty (botched edit job?) since the examples cited at the end are in no manner amateur levels of sport. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I think it's best to compare this to other notability criteria. For example: WP:MUSIC names approximately 12 criteria any one of which can indicate notability. In fact, I don't know of any notability criteria lists that require the subject to meet them all. So that's why I applying either one is okay. (That still leaves the problem of the second criterion conflicting itself, though...- Mgm|^(talk) 17:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Bubble tea!

-down load | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Saasonomics AfD
Can you please review Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Saasonomics as an editor has added the author's article to the AfD. You should verify that your vote is still applicable to both. --Mblumber (talk) 13:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)