User talk:Albusforever88

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Albus Dumbledore, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 22:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to The Hub (TV channel). Thank you. Harry (talk) 22:54, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Build-A-Bear Workshop, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Build-A-Bear Workshop was changed by Albusforever88 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87536 on 2011-03-25T23:01:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Bad childrens shows"

A page you created, Bad childrens shows, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Damirgraffiti (talk) 23:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Albus Dumbledore. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 23:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albusforever88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to make the artical better. I was not just messing around. You should respect changes. Look closer. See if you were making a mistake. I know you are, but you don't--yet. Albusforever88 (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nope, no mistake here. You did not make the article better. Your edits were vandalism and this block to prevent further disruption to the encyclopedia is justified. Kinu ^t/_c 19:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albusforever88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not try to vandalise the artical Albusforever88 (talk) 19:31, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. Kinu ^t/_c 19:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain why you think repeated removal of large sections of sourced content is not vandalism? --Kinu ^t/_c 19:35, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were insulting Albus Dumbldore! You are the one doing something wrong

This response shows a clear disregard and unwillingness to understand the purpose of Wikipedia. I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page... it's a waste of time for everyone. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]