User talk:Alex pereira de araujo

December 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Marquis de Sade, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.

please read WP:SELFCITE

☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alex pereira de araujo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Horror film, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You should also read WP:SELFCITE if you didn't in 2018. Belbury (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rhetoric, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop citing your own papers. Belbury (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Horror film. Belbury (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for adding spam links. Pushing your own work like this is not appropriate, especially as the International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science is not a reliable source. Please read WP:SELFCITE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fences&Windows 21:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]