User talk:Alilucky5

Category seating for default-sorted persons.

Hi - I noticed you added categories with sort codes for some people who are already default sorted.

For example, for Charlie Crist, you added:

[[Category:Florida Republicans|Crist, Charlie]]

However, Charlie Christ already has a {{DEFAULTSORT:Crist, Charlie}} before all of the categories for this article, so it is not necessary to include "|Crist, Charlie" in the category.

Brett Doster

If you want to do extensive edits to a page, make a copy as a subpage of your userpage, such as User:Alilucky5/Brett Doster. Please don't make the current page unavailable to others. worthawholebean _talk^contribs 18:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! bd2412 T 20:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brett Doster. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Waycool27 17:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Doster

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Brett Doster, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. jddphd (talk · contribs) 20:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Brett s doster

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Brett s doster, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Brett s doster is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Brett s doster, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 03:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message

Hi Alilucky5, I have received your message. Unfortunately, I have undid the edit since it was posted on my user page. Messages should be posted on talk page. Thanks!--Sli723 01:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brett Doster 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brett Doster 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

State Policy Network

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of State Policy Network, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: James Madison Institute. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo of spn.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo of spn.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo of SPN.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo of SPN.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:Travellingcari, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BigDunc^Talk 14:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of State Policy Network

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article State Policy Network, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Madcoverboy (talk) 15:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Anthony Appleyard. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not edit other people's user pages without their permission. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 18:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that State Policy Network has been deleted per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State Policy Network. Please do not recreate the article without seeking the advice of one of the deleting admins. Kevin (talk) 06:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SPN Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:SPN Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:S cumber in 2008.jpg

File:S cumber in 2008.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Sada Cumber 2008.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Sada Cumber 2008.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:JMI logo 2010.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:JMI logo 2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 03:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Deion_Sanders_historic_run_in_1988_at_FSU.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Deion_Sanders_historic_run_in_1988_at_FSU.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Foundation for Excellence in Education

The article Foundation for Excellence in Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and no indication of notability. Website shows Jeb Bush as founder, but where is there WP:RS to support this article?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 06:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ex-officio listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ex-officio. Since you had some involvement with the Ex-officio redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]