User talk:AlphaBetaGamma/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:AlphaBetaGamma. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Reward Board
I would like to fulfill your mission on the reward board what are the details and the reward. Thank You. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 17:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- They should be written down on the reward board ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 22:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
WP:UAA reports on users with no edits
Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Only report accounts with edits and do not report those with no edits in the preceding 2 weeks. Do not report a user that has not edited or has not edited in the preceding 2 weeks, except for an instance of an egregious name violation. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations such as names of organizations or products need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.
For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 08:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Asking approval
Please approve Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 if you are free now? @AlphaBetaGamma —⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 08:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- There is a still areas missing citations. If no information is available about them, you can either wait for them to be released or remove them from the draft until the information is available, considering the list can't be completed before it is published due to the nature of the list. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Come again. There are 140 citations and lead doesn't need citations as it's not a topic, but list extracted from 2025 in spaceflight to remove the load and stress of users while traversing to different sections as in 2024 in spaceflight for List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024. As per my knowledge these are list articles that don't need citations for headers, so they have leads without citations but have humongous amount of citations in section other than lead.@AlphaBetaGamma —⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 09:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)