User talk:Amberj1985

Your edits

Hello, thanks for your edits. However, please do not refbomb Wikipedia with references to recent journal articles. I mass-rollbacked all your edits, thinking you might've been some sort of spammer, before realising that many of your other edits were benificial and restoring most of them. However, red links help Wikipedia grow and should be kept sometimes. Your editing pattern is rather bizarre for a new user ... have you previously had another account either here or on another wiki? Graham87 11:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure which edit was reference bombed, as it seems you reverted back. I had no idea about --> red links help Wikipedia grow, but I think that mostly what I removed were less popular things, but I guess there is point there. So from now on if it appears a red link could possibly have a page, then I will not remove it. I never had account here before, but did make pages on Fandom and Everybodywiki, which is somewhat similar. The subject were none notable per Wikipedia guidelines so they would not have qualified here. Amberj1985 (talk) 07:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spectrum Equity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Information services. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Legendary Ventures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legendary Ventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legendary Ventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Edit.pdf (talk) 08:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]