User talk:Asarelah/archive 3

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Mirian (entertainer)

Hi there. I am not used to leaving messages on talke pages, so forgive me if I do this wrong. But I noticed that you, like me, is taking issue with a couple of IPs determined to change Miriam_(entertainer) to say "he" instead of "she" throghout. Your last change left a whole lot of male pronouns in there, leaving the article a bit self-contradictory. Just wanted to ask you to be careful when looking at that article. It's been getting a lot of anonymous IP attention really. Bye bye, and sorry if I messed this message up, or it is inappropriate. Dendlai (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dr. Al Carroll

A tag has been placed on Dr. Al Carroll requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pruning Categories

You seem to be removing categories from alot of Native American subjects. Although I agree that some are redundant and should be removed, not all of your removals, in my opinion, should be removed. Specifically removing "cultures"(such as the Coles Creek culture) from the list of Category:Archaeological cultures. Can we reach a little bit of concensus on this matter?

Women in warfare category

Could you check please if these women were actually involved in warfare? For example, Malika Umazheva was a peaceful activist, just as many other women you included in this category. Thank you.Biophys (talk) 01:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Over-categorisation in general

Hi. Thanks for your input at Talk:Pink (singer). I was trying to make a wider (non-Pink related) point about the way categories (not just national or racial) are applied across Wikipedia, and understood across the world. Do you know if there is a better forum for this? Raising RFCs one page at a time doesn't appeal much! pablo_hablo. 00:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ````

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!

The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories & BLP

Hi. Can you point me to the policy decision/discussion supporting your removal of certain categories. I'm not challenging you, just want to be informed. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!

The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crap!!

Goddamn it, I just spilled my Arizona Green tea all over my fucking desk. ArrrghhhhhhH!!

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I noticed your efforts over the past week or so to revert vandalism on Ear candling. I'm trying to get the article up to encyclopedic standards, and not having to spend time dealing with the vandalism is a big help. Treedel (talk) 09:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I'm not sure I understand your reasoning in moving John Holmes (actor) to John Holmes (pornographic actor). There is no other John Holmes who is an actor for which a page move would be required, there is a disambiguation page for John Holmes that allows a reader to find the correct page and it seems unnecessary to me. Had it moved to John C. Holmes, I could perhaps understand, but this seems to unnecessarily complicate things to me. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buckethead

Hi there! I reverted your edit on Buckethead, including Category:Bands with fictional stage personas. While Buckethead is a fictional stage persona like Unknown Hinson or Nash the Slash, it is a solo artist and not a band. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 23:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Jane Fonda women in war categories

My problems with categorizing Fonda under Women in 20th century warfare or under Women in war in Asia are both the same. I think it is a miscategorization. Fonda is included in American anti-Vietnam War activists, which is accurate and reflects her involvement in the Vietnam war, while being categorized as in war implies a greater involvement than that. When I look at the other persons included in Women in war in Asia, almost every one of them were physically involved in either fighting or other active involvement during warfare. There are a couple included that I don't think are appopriately categorized, though. Women in war in Asia is included under the broader category of American people of the Vietnam War, which seems more inclusive and appropriate in its scope. There are quite a few women who are listed in the American anti-Vietnam War activists category, none of whom are included in categories that imply they had active involvement in actual war time activities. I think that is the distinctive factor and there should be consistency of inclusion in the category that best represents the role that someone played. I also note that Fonda is included in a very broad category of Women in war, and I don't think that is very accurate either, although it could be inclusive of anti-war activists and similar categories if it were consistent. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Female anti-war activists works just fine for me. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Ford

She was married to a man, so I assumed that the bisexual category applied just as much as it did for Freddie Mercury. Am I mistaken?--KingMorpheus (talk) 01:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

""Witches"

Just a quick question. I've noticed that you've been adding "Witch trials" as a category to a number of articles. Since you are a student of anthropology, I'm somewhat confused by your claim of applicability in some of these instances. I first noticed it in your edit of the Handsome Lake article. Do you agree that the term "witch" can vary in its appropriateness as a label from culture to culture and through time as well? I'd suggest that "witch trials", in its formal definition, is most appropriately used in a Western cultural milieu, and that the concept of Witch-hunt (although not a formal category in the encyclopedia) is more appropriate outside of that. My concern is that the average reader will confuse the categories I'm mentioning and that they will simply be lumped together. Your thoughts? cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 16:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making the change. I think that in the long run it will potentially be far less confusing to the readers. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 17:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I must thank you for your kind words in the discussions about The Fisherwife of Palermo and Hans the Werewolf! I do not feel that I really should take part in discussions about articles I have created myself, but I have explained things a good as I could. There was some problems with Dreamguy on the Fisherwifes article, as he removed the context and then complained there was no context. He seems a little hot-tempered. I wrote them as representative examples of a phenomena; perhaps it would have been better to write of the phenomena and include a representative example in them, but that change would be easy: one only need to change the names and intros of the articles, if that is indeed necessary to save them from deletion. I do hope they will not be removed: I really do write articles I think is notable, from sources I trust, although I know I make mistakes as my English is not perfect. Again, thank you for your support! --Aciram (talk) 10:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that is very helpful of you. I can speak and read English very well, but there are still problems with my spelling and with understanding nuances - I had no idea that the Fisherwife-article gave that impression. I have more than one ref about this case, but as the case was described more detailed in one of them, I only used that book in the article. There was some time ago I read about these cases, but I will look them up again this week and double-check everything, inkluding that of the torture issue: I seem to remember that the fisherwife gave her confession villingly, because her belief in the fairies was a part of a folklore for which she was not ashamed, and therefore saw no reason to hide, which is why her story has taken as an example of folklore and not just a confession made by leading questions under torture: the Inquisition, as far as I remember from the book, simply did not care about the fairires, and would have extracted a confession involving Satan and demons rather than fairies. I will mention this when I have checked it all again. The trouble is that I have so little time on my hands! I will defenitely do my best to find the time as soon as possible. --Aciram (talk) 11:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good. It's always usefull with such comments - as the creator you sometimes forget that others would not have so much knowledge of a subject as yourself after having just read the references, so there are often things which could be clarified. As was requested on the deletion nomination, I will change the titles of the articles, so the cases will be treated as examples within the subjects. I don't mind doing this, as I have thught about it before but somewhat lacked the confidence. These subjects really deserve an article here!--Aciram (talk) 14:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Kurt Cobain

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Kurt Cobain/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject for Ultima related topics created. Please join us.

Since you are a fan of the Ultima series, I thought I'd contact you ask if you were interested in our new WikiProject dedicated to improving all Ultima related articles on Wikipedia. If so, please sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Ultima Dream Focus 15:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page moves

Hi, I asked for one of your moves to be reverted at the Admin incident page and it was noted that there were a handful of articles also moved. WP:QUALIFIER is not always definitive what to do here but the essence of the disambiguation is simply to differentiate enough from our other articles of the same name so our readers find what they are looking for. Pornography is not useful for a biography disambiguation even though that is the main field of a person's notability. Depending what other people with the same name are also known for, director or pornagraphic actor will likely suffice. We should generally err on the conservative side of things. -- Banjeboi 20:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Inter-Tribal Environmental Council

An editor has nominated Inter-Tribal Environmental Council, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter-Tribal Environmental Council and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. -- Eastmain (talk) 23:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is rather offensive

It is rather offensive that you, as someone who calls herself straight, keep imposing her view of things on articles about other people i.e. bisexuals. You insist on a view that belonging to a category of sexuality is about how one labels oneself this week, or month, or year. It is not, and the guidelines of wikipedia do not say so: your interpretation is perverse. People can use whatever words they like about themselves and mean whatever they like by them; that is their own concern. An encyclopedia need only use commonly accepted terms or define its own terms and stick to them. This inability to get out of your own head and see things objectively as others in society see them is possibly part of your Asperger's. If you are offended by the last sentence, you may be going some way to understanding how you are offending me. MerriFunn (talk) 02:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Hi, that's a common misunderstanding. We only disambiguate enough to clarify which of the three people that article is about. As there is only one actor there is no need to disambiguate beyond that. If a second article with the same person's name who was also an actor we would try to find the best way to differentiate the two. -- Banjeboi 21:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How Unique!

A female Jew with aspergers syndrome. You don't see that everyday...--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 16:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

female wartime crossdressers

Hmm, I won't remove the category, but it seems unfortunate to conflate: 1) people who lived as women outside the war who cross-dressed for the purpose of the war; with 2) female-to-male transgendered who also happened to serve in a war. They're certainly quite distinct historical phenomena. --Delirium (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Standingbear2.jpg

File:Standingbear2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Standingbear2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Standingbear2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Sex Trade Category from Forced Prostitution

Hey

You removed the sex trade category from Forced Prostitution when that is another category on the same level as Prostitution so I've reverted it (but not your other category removal) if you want to challenge it please discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 13:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on the Forced Prostitution talk page. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Asarelah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Oren Lyons - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bibi Khem Kaur Dhillon

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Bibi Khem Kaur Dhillon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TM 00:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jhalkaribai

I found the stub about Jhalkaribai that you had created a few years ago. I expanded it x5 and it is in the row of DYK (articles created on March 7). There is some issue about the life section of the article. It would be a great help if you can help. Shivashree · talk 03:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently in a peer review. See this. Your suggestions will be helpful. Shivashree · talk 06:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asia, oceana etc

You are right, but I do have issues with over-cat, and when I see asia/oceana, I do not believe that any location is in such an intersect - its one or the other - cheers Satu Suro 01:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough good point and I will take note of that in future (my anthropology first year lecturers loved showing the documentaies of west new guinea)- but hey its almost worth an article - bit like the wallace line article - of the intersection - we have many edit wars and strange issues arising from the notion of 'Australasian' and the sight of the word Austronesian usually leaves me in more quandaries than are worth sharing. cheers Satu Suro 01:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abbey Lee

She describes herself as swinging both ways. Lots of people who are lesbian by any definition (they say they love only women) don't like the word lesbian. They still appear in lists. Many men dislike the word gay or even homosexual. I have seen people say this before. There can be no word that everyone likes. It was tried to make it "people who have had relationships with men and women" to avoid a dreaded label, but that got nowhere. Some day bisexuals may be called something else, then everyone on the list will drop off the list until they sign up to the new name? JenAW (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those are all valid points to make, but they are not relevant here. "Bisexual" is a very specific and very politically loaded term, and it is unfair to label a living person "bisexual" when they reject the word squarely, or indeed, reject any label to their sexuality. I believe that we should err on the side of caution when it comes to the lives of living people, though labeling the dead (as long as there is a source) is of no concern to me. You can put up a "request for comment" on the list if you like, but if you look in the talk archives, you will see that this issue has been argued ad nauseaum already and it would be a waste of time. Asarelah (talk) 22:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at previous discussion. I think you are the only person who feels there is a problem. The list of lesbian, gay or bisexual people "labels" people who haven't adopted a particular label. How? On the basis of common sense. In your mind "bisexual" is a shameful term. In my mind it is no more loaded than "surfer". People may not like the word surfer, but if they surf, or if they say "I like to go out on a board and ride the waves", they could go in a list of surfers. You seem determined to aid, succour and support to homophobic people. That at least is the effect or your words and deeds. JenAW (talk) 23:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So once again you accuse me of being homophobic and/or biphobic? No, I assure you, I am not homophobic. I am merely puzzled and more than a little irritated at your bizarre insistence that YOU, JenAW, are somehow more capable than the subjects of these biographies at understanding and labeling their sexuality than they themselves are. What is more oppressive, respecting the wishes of a person who does not want a label attached to them, or forcing that label onto them whether they like it or not? You claim to want to help queer people, yet you seem to think that YOU hold the ultimate right to decide who they are, and too damn bad for them if they object. For someone who wants to help the oppressed, you certainly seem pretty damn determined to ignore their voices. Oh by the way...comparing the term "bisexual" to the term "surfer" is like comparing apples to oranges. Nobody ever complained that the term "surfer" was too narrow and didn't encompass people who were outside the gender binary. No athlete has ever objected to the label of "surfer". Nobody has ever said that they weren't sure if they were a surfer or not. Furthermore, if a living person on the list of surfers object to being placed there, I'd remove them from that list too. Asarelah (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why this seemingly pathological fear of "labels"? You seem to have way too much invested in it. You have taken it upon yourself to be the police. Lots of people add perfectly well sourced entries (people talking perfectly openly - because they do not think it is any more shameful than surfing - about their relationships with both sexes) that you then remove for nonsensical reasons. You never contribute anything. You took it upon yourself to take over and impose yourself. The list explained itself and you decided to come along and change it. You are proud to belong to a nation with a terrible record for ethnic cleansing, lynch law and homophobia. I'd have thought you would feel the responsibility to reduce homophobia (along with racism and sexism) rather than perpetuate the idea that being gay, lesbian or bisexual is shameful. That's what the homophobes want: for people to treat it as if it was like pedophilia. You perpetuate that. If you go away and think hard about it, you might eventually see it. You weren't around to fight the fight when it mattered for jews, slaves, native americans. Now the fight has moved on, and your efforts are all negative and damaging. One day you might wake up and be ashamed.JenAW (talk) 00:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried over and over and over again to be reasonable with you, and you, either unwilling or unable to defend your arguments, have yet again resorted to deeply insulting personal attacks. I direct your attention to Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and I am also initiating a Wikiquette Alert. By the way, I happen to be Jewish and I find it appalling that you would have the utter gall to compare the brutality that my great-grandfather suffered at the hands of the cossacks to someone disagreeing with you on the Internet. Asarelah (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have jumped to conclusions and did not read what I wrote carefully enough. I was comparing the brutality that many jews, slaves, and native americans suffered to the treatment widely meted out to gay, lesbian or bisexual people in history (including today). If you read you will see that I was saying nothing about you. I did ask you why you seemed so terrified of labels. Then I said how your contribution seems to be entirely negative, acting like the self-appointed police. Both of which might be 'tough' points of view, but perfectly legitimate in a forum that values free speech and open debate. Something I hope you value too. You accused me of having a "bizarre insistence", a deeply offensive thing to say, but I am grown up enough not to take offence at that sort of thing. If you ever come to Ireland, I'll buy you a pint. JenAW (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I am quite well aware of the violence suffered by LGBT people in the past and the present and I most certainly see and understand the historical analogues to other oppressed groups, and I find your assumption that I am unaware of this patronizing. However, it is irrelevant to this editing dispute. You claim you said nothing negative about me, and yet you inform me that I am perpetuating homophobia by virtue of my editing, which isn't true. I have repeatedly stated my reasons for expunging the list of certain individuals and you continue to attack me personally rather than the merits of my arguments. You also made a very snide remark about how I shouldn't be proud to be an American because simply because my nation has some very unfortunate chapters in its history, which is totally and utterly inappropriate. If you want to resolve this civilly, we should continue this discussion over on the post at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts. Asarelah (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving wikiquette alert should it come up again.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts/archive84#Accusations_of_homophobia_from_User:JenAW

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ManyHorses.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:ManyHorses.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 12:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Leanbear.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Leanbear.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 12:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bigbear.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Bigbear.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Goesahead.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Goesahead.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:36, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Victorio2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Victorio2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Littlewolfcheyenne.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Littlewolfcheyenne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HairyMoccasin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HairyMoccasin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Morningstar2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Morningstar2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kilsoquah1913.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Kilsoquah1913.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Irontail.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Irontail.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Twomoons.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Twomoons.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Whitebuffalo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Whitebuffalo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Littlesoldier.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Littlesoldier.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Struckbytheree.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Struckbytheree.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hedog.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hedog.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Seattle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Seattle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:YellowThunder.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:YellowThunder.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:JingoKogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JingoKogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leatherlips

Hello, I was just reading Leatherlips and wondered why you added it to the category Category:People executed for witchcraft as witchcraft or sorcery doesn't seem to be mentioned in the article. Regard, --Beloved Freak 13:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maire o Ciaragain

Hi there. Could you give any further information on this woman? I'm reasonably familiar with Medieval Ireland and have never heard of her. Fergananim (talk) 01:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Because women are so rarely mentioned in Gaelic Ireland (except as the daughters, wives and mothers of important men), I try and make a special effort to include them, no matter how obscure or unsavory. Kerrigan is the way it is pronounced, but we don't use K in Irish, instead useing a harsh C. This is why Americans pronounce Cahill as Kay-hill, and so forth (its actual sound is 'KHATHal'. Varients include Corrigan. There are two, apparently unrelated, clans of the name; one in Breifne, a second in the east Thomond/northOrmond region. Not at all a prominent name in Irish history. Let me know if you ever come across any other stray Irish girls and boys; I'd like to bring them home. Fergananim (talk) 18:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me an advice?

Hello Asarelah! You have been helpfull to me before, and even once decorated me with a medal (I may be more than a novice editor by now;), for which I was very flattered by the way.

I have recently provided several sources to the article of Sophia Magdalena of Denmark. These references were provided as one user, User:SergeWoodzing, have questioned some information in the article in what seemed to be a rather heated argument. Now, however, returning to the article to rephrased the text, I find that User:SergeWoodzing have deleted all of the references, claiming that it is necessary to provide page numbers for them to be accepted. I can confirm that every references provides the information asked for, and after having spend a whole day on this, is it truly necessary to visit the library to look up even the page numbers? Now, I am very reluctant to enter in to this conflict, as it seen to be quite heated: especially since this user seem to have removed the references because they contradict his own oppinions in the matter. Can I ask you for an advice? Is it acceptable to remove references and then claim that they are no references? I would be most gratefull for your assistance. --Aciram (talk) 01:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Don't worry about answering the above; I had the time to aquire the page numbers after all, so i'ts no longer an issue. Regards.--Aciram (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skype

You might note that at least one of your recent edits also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you. [1] in particular. --Rumping (talk) 19:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The June 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural & Religious Affiliation of Helen Thomas

Please note that 'Antiochian Orthodox' is just a sub-category of 'Greek Orthodox' = Greek Orthodox Christians of Syrian, Lebanese and Southern Turkish descent = the group Helen Thomas repeatedly self-identified with.

That sub-category clearly constitutes an acurate description of Helen Thomas's religious and cultural affiliation BASED ON WHAT SHE WROTE- see formative years (Preface, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2) of her biography "Front Row at the White House" (2000) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.158.109.242 (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies ^talk 21:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Okanicon for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Okanicon, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okanicon until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 14:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lozen04.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lozen04.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms"
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chiropractic Cat

Hey, I saw you removed the category [Healthcare occupations] from the Chiropractic article. I didn't see a reason listed by you, or one I could come up with myself (it is a healthcare occupation, and the category itself seems valid), so I put it back. Let me know if there was a reason you think it doesn't fit. Thanks, Ocaasi (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 23:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bear Cut Ear‎

The article Bear Cut Ear‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Uyvsdi (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal you mentioned

Who is it?--Knowitall659 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't bother to check the edit history. Asarelah (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

The disambiguations you have been chosing for when you have decided to move all of these articles on porn actors are not suitable. "Belladonna (person)" is a bad title, and "Kirsten Price (sex worker)" is fifty times worse than "Kirsten Price (pornographic actress)". Please stop moving these pages to titles that could possibly violate WP:BLP. In the future, try to use neutral words in disambiguations. "Porn" and "Pornographic" should not appear in disambiguations, and "Sex worker" should never be used, regardless of it being factual.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Pornographic actress" (re: Belladonna) is a bad DAB as well. (Note the capital letter.) Nymf _hideliho! 18:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't move it anywhere else at the moment and I have a requested move up to get rid of the "Pornographic" part.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the relevant policies (WP:BLP, WP:DAB) and do not bother me again.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cut Syamsurniati

The article Cut Syamsurniati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:1E

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Female wartime crossdressers

Category:Female wartime crossdressers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires
Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Winehouse

Hy there. I removed the bi-sexual categories because I was unable to find anything in the article about Amy Winehouse's bisexuality. After your post I checked to article's history and I dsicovered that you added the statement with a source but that User:Prayer for the wild at heart removed it later [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Amy_Winehouse&action=historysubmit&diff=441315806&oldid=441314023). In the end you complained (rightly so) to the wrong person. Flamarande (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Assignment on transgender articles

I'm not sure where we're disagreeing? I agree with you that the term "assigned female at birth" is the most neutral term to describe the way in which a doctor (or other adult) examines a newborn infant and assesses the infant's external anatomy in order to assign a sex category. That's why I've made edits that change things like "born female" to "assigned female at birth": the first is a phrase that takes sides in the debate over which biological features determine sex, whereas the latter is an impartial description of what typically happens at a birth. At Wikipedia we document debates rather than participating in them.

Or am I not understanding your question or statement? SparsityProblem (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It was changed after I edited it, and I gave up on that article because the other editor was being very aggressive and I couldn't find anyone to back me up (even after asking on the LGBT project page). SparsityProblem (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan
Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Come hang out with us!

Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, women in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine
Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women in warfare

G'day from Oz; I just can't see how an item about someone receiving a promotion; or completing a route march under the same conditions as men; or becoming a pilot; or being good at baseball, fencing or air rifle shooting; or being appointed to a human resources position; or being appointed as a rabbi; belongs in that article. In fact, I find it offensive that items such as those should actually be lumped in with items about women risking and giving their lives in combat. By all means record the info somewhere, but not there. My suggestion is that you either start a new article, or rename the existing one to something other than Women in warfare. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power
Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of female rock singers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of female rock singers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female rock singers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing
Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Female ejaculation. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pink film

Hi: I recently reverted some edits you made on categories for pink film actresses. Pink film is very soft core - less explicit than much standard fare on HBO or Showtime. The various categories of the type "(nationality) pornographic film actors" and the "Female pornographic film actors" category are used consistently throughout Wikipedia only for hardcore porn actors. As far as I can determine no softcore actresses from other nationalities are put in these hardcore categories and there is no reason to make an exception for Japanese pink film actresses. I created the "Pink film actors" category to mark this uniquely Japanese concept for users and editors and I don't think it belongs as a subset of hardcore porn. I think it reasonable to have it listed under the "Japanese pornography" category which does include other types of softcore porn as well. Good editing! Cherryblossom1982 (talk) 07:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April Flores

I reverted your most recent edit. As far as the supposed malware concern, this might explain it. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 07:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars
Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein
Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 20:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of bisexual people: N–S, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bizarre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books
Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator
Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Stockwell Article

Asarelah,

Article: Melissa Stockwell.

I don't know if you are aware of the mistake in the above article in the Infobox it says she is 5 foot 5 inches and she's 2 metres. The height in metres is wrong, no where near 2 metres tall! Adamdaley (talk) 08:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Christianity noticeboard#Queer theory speculation and history

I expect you'll want to contribute to this discussion. Mangoe (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Your recent editing history at Amber Heard shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Nymf _hideliho! 15:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The LGBT Barnstar
		For your work in helping to bring clarity to LGBT issues before the 19th century Contaldo80 (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Common sense.

After reading what you've said about labels and Amber Heard, I think I love you hahaha! It's so refreshing to see some common sense. The bisexual label should not have even been invented let alone discussed. And now we have some guy saying she could catagory lesbian. If you read it, you will find many faults. It's sad. Not just that. But the whole thing in general. MGFrost1981 (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books
Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Asarelah. You have new messages at Talk:Jenna_Jameson#State_categories.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 01:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Asarelah. You have new messages at Talk:Jenna_Jameson#State_categories.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 05:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thusnelda

Hi, Why did you remove ancient women as a category from Thusnelda? Flaviusvulso (talk) 01:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books
Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 01:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actor categories by nationality + gender

Just a heads up before you put too much work into it, they are probably going to be deleted. I haven't been able to dig up the discussion yet, but as you can tell by clicking Category:American female actors, there have been numerous discussions that has resulted in delete before. Nymf _hideliho! 19:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited Mia Smiles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

Your edit summaries on Lunch at the Gotham Café‎ ...

...make me smile my special in-joke smile :) A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		I wholly appreciate your helpful arguments on the talk pages of "my" articles that are at AfD, but it might be much better if you make those arguments on the actual AfD discussion pages. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? \| Wanna talk about it?} 23:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces
Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War
Interview: Article writers discuss biographies
Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 14:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up: Revisiting Amber Heard in the bisexual category

Hi, Asarelah. I'm just stopping by your talk page to let you know that I took this matter to the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard.[2] Flyer22 (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hispanic and Latino American female pornographic film actors

Category:Hispanic and Latino American female pornographic film actors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 11:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Woodward

FYI: re Dani Woodward - there is no category of porn stars from Michigan; it is a red link. Were you planning on adding a category? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:49, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign
Op-ed: Remembering conflict

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 18:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Traditional Native American medical plants

Category:Traditional Native American medical plants, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 20:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plants used in traditional South and Central American medicine

Category:Plants used in traditional South and Central American medicine, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brad7777 (talk) 16:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had to close that discussion as "delete". The current members are:

Also, the head categories were [[Category:Health in Central America]] [[Category:Health in South America]] [[Category:Indigenous peoples of Central America]] [[Category:Indigenous topics of South America]] [[Category:Flora of Central America]] [[Category:Flora of South America]] [[Category:Medicinal plants by tradition]]

To start a list, you may be able to make use of the existing pages at Traditional Brazilian medicine and in Category:Mesoamerican medicine. – Fayenatic London 14:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion
Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dahteste.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dahteste.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Brea Bennett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Samira Jassim

I've again reverted your addition of Category:War rape to this article. Please see our article on war rape - as I read it, it refers to rape of the "enemy" (people of the opposing or occupied location), whereas you seem to be using the category to say that any use of rape in war fits the category. Let's come to an agreement here or at the article talk page, or seek broader input if we can't agree. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(NB that we could totally link the article from articles on rape, so that it wouldn't be isolated - astoundingly, we don't seem to have an article on rape in religion, or really on many cultural aspects of rape at all, but that's the sort of thing that it might be good to link from. Also Rape in Iraq theoretically will exist one day, as will the corresponding category.) –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. Asarelah (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amile Waters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guyanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II
Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]