User talk:Atul.ghosh87

This is Atul.ghosh87's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vartika Jain (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vartika Jain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vartika Jain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atul.ghosh87! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vartika Jain

Hello, Atul.ghosh87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vartika Jain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vartika Jain

Hello, Atul.ghosh87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vartika Jain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reciprocal rule for shutter speed (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I declined this because the sources cited aren't impressive; in particular, the websites nicholastinelli.com, photographygoals.com and randomclicksphotography.co.in don't seem to qualify as reliable sources. Also, which part(s) of this can be found in which of the sources that you cite? See Li Rui as an example of an article that shows which source is used for what. Not reasons for declining, but: I'd guess that this explanation assumes "full frame 35 mm" (i.e. 36×24 mm) frame size. Is this "rule" (of thumb) affected by image (or sensor) size? "Nikon announces the Z DX 24mm F1.7, a fast 36mm-equiv for APS-C mirrorless" is a humdrum PR piece about a "24mm" but "36mm-equiv" lens; should a user of this lens apply this rule to an actual focal length of 24mm or an "equivalent" (?) focal length of 36mm? I think that an article here should say which (citing a reliable source for the answer, of course).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reciprocal rule for shutter speed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 12:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Reciprocal rule for shutter speed has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Reciprocal rule for shutter speed. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reciprocal rule for shutter speed

Hello, Atul.ghosh87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reciprocal rule for shutter speed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reciprocal rule for shutter speed

Hello, Atul.ghosh87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reciprocal rule for shutter speed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]