User talk:Avermani10

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Benjamin Pavard have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Benjamin Pavard was changed by Avermani10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88717 on 2021-05-31T18:03:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sexism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Arccosecant. I noticed that in this edit to Men Going Their Own Way, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — csc^-1 23:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User:Arccosecant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Girth Summit _(blether) 23:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Girth Summit _(blether) 23:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

UTRS 54833

UTRS appeal #54833 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75569

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]