User talk:Bearcat/Archive 53
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bearcat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | → | Archive 60 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:News agencies based in Australia
A tag has been placed on Category:News agencies based in Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Concerns About WE Charity Article Vandalism
Hello @Bearcat:
I hope you are doing well.
I recently reverted an edit on the WE Charity article. It was specifically about the controversy surrounding the organization and the federal government program, the Canada Student Service Grant. The first thing that caught my attention was the first sentence where it appeared to attack the Liberal Party of Canada, even though the party nor any federal party for that matter issues contracts on behalf of the federal government, the paragraph did read a little opinionated as well. There was also the lack of a necessary reference and grammatical errors. The edit is the first and only one by an anonymous user, which also made me question whether it belonged in the article or not. One of those things alone may not warrant a reverted edit, but considering it all, I decided to revert the edit.
I was wondering if you would be able to add the article to your watchlist in case this user and/or others attempt to vandalize it again. I thought you may be the best person to address this to, with it being a Canadian organization and the Government of Canada.
Thank you so much, I hope you stay safe and well.
--24.76.221.29 (talk) 07:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Before beginning this comes with a fiddly disclosure on my side: my post on its talk page about the protection level comes just after someone posted a link to it on discord, with no commentary. This message comes after a discussion that I eventually severed myself from to raise on-wiki. [Time stamp c. 16:02]
In any case, this is about an INVOLVED concern (as distinct from the protection level concerns I have). You created this article, but protected it after this set of edits. The edits should have been reverted, but they don't appear to be any of the narrow exceptions permitted by INVOLVED.
Please could you clarify (or remove the protection/submit for review if I'm not missing something). Nosebagbear (talk) 15:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Bearcat, just confirming you didn't miss this in the midst of several other messages Nosebagbear (talk)
AfD Pushback
Does there seem to be a lot more push back for candidates on AfD than usual?--Mpen320 (talk) 03:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Draft Review
Hi,
You helped me figure out a category question recently. Would you have time to take a look at this draft page for posting? Draft:The_Octavian_Report Thank you
ORCommsGalKayla (talk) 18:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mclachlan-mirrorball.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mclachlan-mirrorball.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Having trouble determining notability for this station. It seems to have existed on a temporary basis [1] and intermittently, broadcasting as much as two weeks a month [2]. CRTC has nothing to go on, which is worrisome. Does it meet WP:BCAST? Raymie (t • c) 04:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Busy busy: All The Mistakes I've Made
I've been back at it like a madman lately on Donald Shebib, his films, and Clifford Wiens' kids. I really need to slow down. After giving this (All The Mistakes I've Made) a lot of thought, I finally came up with a way to do these performance works by Daniel Cockburn after returning to his article and creating The Other Shoe (film). I did this by looking up Category:Performances, which I've added, along with Category:Film criticism. I'm not sure what else to put here, though, as the performance lectures themselves are not actually films. They sound like a lot of fun like so much he does (check out Doctor Virtuous on YouTube). ZarhanFastfire (talk) 02:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
RuPaul's Drag Race terminology
I'm not sure if RuPaul's Drag Race terminology is your preferred type of article to work on, but I've been having a blast putting this list together and reading the definitions in journalistic sources. Feel free to join if you'd like. I would actually love to keep this list legit and ultimately promoted to FL status. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Nurse.Fighter.Boy again
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Admin Bearcat protection review. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Bearcat - I see you made a recent edit. I'd ask you to consider revisiting this thread. I think we can close it without too much further unpleasantness if you're willing to make a statement saying you understand the concerns presented. Both El C and I made suggestions about what that language could look like. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Thoughts on countering vandalism
Hi Bearcat. It's probably quite presumptuous of me to consider offering you advice on ways of dealing with disruption, given how long you've been here. All my experience has been gained in the last couple of years, and so I've only ever known the current environment, so I thought that you might find it useful to have my perspective. I'd like to offer some thoughts, not in a 'this is how you should do it' way, but more in a 'this is what I have come to understand since I started editing' way - please take them, or leave them, as you see fit.
- I think that the usual approach is to start with the minimum amount of restriction, and then ramp it up if the disruption doesn't stop. The minimum amount of restriction is usually preventing a single account/IP from editing - so, a block (whether that be partial or full) for edit warring, promotion or whatever is most appropriate.
- You're correct that they can fairly easily create a new account or switch IPs and continue with the disruption. When that happens, it's time to protect the page, but we don't usually apply protection in case that happens.
- Again with the start low and ramp up if necessary - start with semi protection, then ramp up if the disruption continues, considering pending changes and ECP before going to full protection.
- An observation on IP blocks - individual IPs, and even large IP ranges, are commonly blocked for much more than a few hours or days - persistently disruptive IPs are regularly blocked for months, and I've seen situations where they are blocked for a year at a time. We don't indef IPs, and I can't think of any cases where I've seen them blocked for over a year, but I have seen situations where they have been blocked for a year, started disrupting again when the block lapses, and then been immediately reblocked for another year. Again - I'd start with a short block, but if the same IP continues disruption after the block expires, I'd impose a longer one.
- As for the 'involved' question, I am absolutely certain that there was no bad intention on your part, and you were acting to protect our content as any admin should - seriously, no question about that in my mind. Personally though, if there was a problem on a page I'd written (aside from outright 'fuck Wikipedia'-type vandalism), I'd ask another admin to look at it, just for the optics. A request at RfPP or on a noticeboard, along the lines of 'This is a problem, I think it needs whatever action, but I wrote the article so won't do it myself', would probably get a response almost immediately.
I hope that is in some way useful, if only as food for thought. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 09:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Addendum: by strange coincidence, shortly after posting the above I noticed a thread at AN (WP:AN#The_KKK_took_my_baby_away) where Drmies is talking about a two-year block on an IP range. That's a bit of a different kettle of fish - an IP-hopping racist LTA, if I read the thread correctly - but it emphasises the point that it's not controversial to apply long-term blocks to IPs if that's necessary to stop disruption. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 10:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, User:Girth Summit--you'll probably find more than a few such blocks in my log, but those come about because of the nature of such vandalism, and the fact that I'm a CU. It took me quite a while to start placing such long blocks, and I still feel uncomfortable doing it; I take that as a good sign. I have also become less hesitant in applying longterm semi-protection to the targets of LTAs--but again, those are really special circumstances. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Bearcat
Thank you for creating Mary Berg (chef).
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:17, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Small Canadian radio stations
In clearing out Category:Radio station articles without infoboxes, I found a bunch of small/First Nations/community stations that we have articles for but don't have much of any attesting material with the CRTC or Industry Canada:
Do these pass the notability bar still? I worry we're going to have quite the time trying to verify anything. CIML-FM isn't in the Industry Canada database, but there's evidence it's still on air, so I haven't included it here. Raymie (t • c) 03:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Page stalker comment: You might consider condensing them into a list article. Gleeanon409 (talk) 04:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gleeanon409: Usually this means they had a licence but lost it or it was never renewed. A number of these I can't even get that far with. Raymie (t • c) 18:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'll look into these and see if I can find anything, but I agree that there might be problems sourcing them properly. Bearcat (talk) 19:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Deletion review for Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. LennyBernstein (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Natalie McMaster
Hello Bearcat! I see that you've added the category "20th-century Canadian women singers" to Natalie MacMaster. While I'm sure she can sing, it's not what she's known for, as far as I know. She is an incredible fiddler and musician, and she can stepdance, but I've seen one of her shows and I don't recall her singing. Rather than flat-out reverting your edit, I thought I would write this note in case you know more about her talents than I do. Cheers, PKT(alk) 18:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Stan VanderWerf - Wikipedia Page
Hi! Bearcat I introduced Mr. VanderWerf's page in an attempt to recognize a Military Combat Veteran who received Medals of Honor during Active Duty and then went on to contribute to society in a positive way. It so happens that his work as a Commissioner has been at the forefront of the page.
I learned from another wiki editor (and another Living Biography page) that an FOI request for his accomplishments in Military Service could be used to help with Medals of Honor citations. It looks like another wiki user requested the FOI to help. I used https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Cotton as my example and tried to structure this page like that one. I was attempting to make the page biographical.
Thank you, for your insight on this. I think we should all work to recognize more often our Military Veterans who have made great contributions to society. Thanks, again for your help! PeytonRose (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Calvin Pedersen
Calvin Pedersen is the new MLA for Kugluktuk (electoral district), https://www.elections.nu.ca/en/kugluktuk-election. I know you have written the bios on MLA's before so I thought you might be interested in it. By the way until I saw the announcement I hadn't heard his Inuinnaqtun name. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)