User talk:Birdflu2006

Reply to your question

Birdflu2006, hi. I deleted the article according to the process spelled out at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. The article was tagged for deletion on April 9, and on April 14 I deleted it, because nobody had removed the tag or said anything about why it shouldn't be deleted.

As is also explained at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, all it takes is somebody saying they think the article should exist, and the deletion may be reversed (or the article recreated from scratch) without prejudice. The reason given by the nominator was "Vanity", which is a reference to the Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines, which you might want to read, and decide whether you think they apply in this case. If you want, I'm happy to undelete the article, but that's no guarantee that it won't be taken to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion if it fails to meet our inclusion criteria. Wikipedia:Notability is a good page to read, in this regard, as is Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is an official policy page, and carries more weight than the others.

I hope I've answered your question fully. Please let me know if I can help with anything else. -GTBacchus^(talk) 03:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way

You can sign posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically generate a signature linking to your user page. Cheers. -GTBacchus^(talk) 03:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonation of Julianna Rose Mauriello on Wiki

Why are you encouraging this impersonator on Wiki? User juliannarosemauriello is not the real Julianna Rose Mauriello!!! If you want to check call her agent Nancy Carlson at 212.307.1882 and ask!

And why was the entry for the Newburgh Swim Sharks removed without going through the proper removal procedures?

Why are records of the Julianna posers changes being deleted? Even if this really was her, do celebrities get special privlidges on wikipedia? Birdflu2006 02:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, even if she isn't real, she's been the only one acting properly. It was properly removed, with {{prod|Vanity}}. Celebrities do not get special priviliges on Wikipedia. However, some posted a.) personal information b.) about a minor c.) who is a known target for, lets say "self-satisfying" men. Also, don't say "on Wiki"; it's Wikipedia. -- Zanimum 12:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but Nancy Carson (You didn't even spell her name correctly) is not my legal guardian and is just my agent. She works for ME, please remember that. I guess you think that everything I do online must pas her scrutiny, maybe you should tell her I have a MySpace account too. If you are so concerned about me why is it you have littered WikiPedia with totally false information about me in so many of your posts and have changed both my wiki and LazyTown wiki with totally off the wall information such as I'm sleeping with Magnus. I'm sure Zanimum can see your past Wikipedia "contributions" especially the old ones in my old Archived UserTalk. I didn't ask for and I don't get any special prileges on Wikipedia, I just want my wiki to be factual, not some made up stuff by people who THINK they know.JuliannaRoseMauriello 15:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, user JuliannaRoseMauriello was blocked from posting because the user was impersonating a celebrity. Birdflu2006 00:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]