User talk:Blind17

Speedy deletion of Rapid Assault Tactics (R.A.T.)

A tag has been placed on Rapid Assault Tactics (R.A.T.), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jons63 (talk) 02:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Rapid Assault Tactics (R.A.T.). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Rapid Assault Tactics (R.A.T.). If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that this article should stay, put hangon in {{}} and give a reason, removing the tag is vandalism. Jons63 (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Assault Tactics (R.A.T.)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Rapid Assault Tactics (R.A.T.), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rapid Assault Tactics

I have nominated Rapid Assault Tactics, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapid Assault Tactics. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 17:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Fernandes

A tag has been placed on Chris Fernandes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Stroppolo^talk 21:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paul Vunak

An article that you have been involved in editing, Paul Vunak, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Vunak. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw (talk) 10:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Hi. Please refrain from peppering Wikipedia with external links to commercial websites, as you have done recently at Jeet Kun Do, Filipino Martial Arts and Hand-to-hand combat. Such links do nothing to improve the encyclopedia and could be construed as linkspamming. Please read WP:EXTERNAL to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policy on external links. Yunshui (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chris.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chris.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]