User talk:Bretsanner
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Safety.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Safety.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Nimuaq (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meta-Functional Expertise.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushton2010 (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I've had to reject your article as it does not give adequate context; readers who are unfamiliar with that particular discipline would have no idea what you are on about as you jump straight into the deep-end, so to speak. It just needs a brief introduction to introduce the subject and give some context. Referencing, formatting and everything else are very good so it will pass the review process with an introduction.
If you want to let me know when you've made your changes, I'd be happy to review it for you and save it lingering in the backlog for weeks.
Rushton2010 (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Your article reads very well; It's simple enough that anyone could understand what you are talking about but not so basic to leave people wanting more information.
It passed all the criteria and is live at Meta-Functional Expertise
Many Thanks
Rushton2010 (talk) 01:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Rushton2010 (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Safety, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Safety
[edit]
Hello Bretsanner. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Psychological Safety".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Safety}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)