User talk:Ca/Archives/2023/July

Question from NICKI4THP (17:27, 10 May 2023)

I would like to make a page for myself and edit other pages

How do I do that? --NICKI4THP (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, try taking a look at these two help pages Help:Editing and Help:Your first article. Carpimaps (talk) 23:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Dewey the cat

Hello, Carpimaps

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Wikieditor019 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Dewey the cat, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 12#Dewey the cat.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wikieditor019}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

review request

can you review my article or suggest some changes Jathera (Shrine)? ਗਿਆਨੀ ਪੁਰਸ਼ (talk) 07:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

There are duplicate citations like 12 and 13. You should only use one and write the page number like you did on citations 3 and 4. Also, are you sure Journal of Punjab Studies is a reliable source? It is a lesser-known journal and I don't see any evidence of peer review. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 08:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Request for review

Hello Carpimaps,

Hope you are in your best health.

I have recently gone through your review which you have done for Sybrid Private Limited. And, thank you for cleaning Wikipedia. I just edit such page with neutral tone. Can you please review that page and let me know if any changes are required or what is your take now...

Thanking you, I remain Robertglan (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Deep6 (film)

You've declined this submission for copyvios. Can you clean the draft up per Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions/Copyright cleanup instructions as I can't see any significant violations. Nthep (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Done. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 03:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Nthep (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work in AfC over the last few weeks, usually a thankless task...! Your work is not going unnoticed. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 22:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Request on 16:45:45, 6 June 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Smstarck

• Smstarck (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Conservation History Association of Texas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing the page. I would appreciate any guidance you can provide. If this association was listed on an existing Wikipedia page, such as one on the subject of conservation or Texas history, would that meet the criteria of an independent source? The association is a registered charity and it is recognized by respected organizations such as Texas A&M University, Baylor University an the University of Texas. I am not sure how to proceed. Thank you

Smstarck (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Smstarck - be aware of WP:CIRCULAR, if that is what you are referring to by if it was listed on an existing Wikipedia page?

It may be helpful for you to read WP:NORG as well, which demonstrates the guidelines for assessing the notability of org's.

Hope that is of use. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Yes, this is helpful. I have a better understanding of this issue now. Thank you. Smstarck (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Draft:IMDEA Software Institute

Hello Carpimaps,

I have recently seen your revision and I don't know what I should modify for it to be approved, I hope you can help me.

thanks in advance Buer.asd (talk) 11:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

@Buer.asd Hello. There are few problems with your referencing. First, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. You should remove them. Second, you need inline citations. You can see the help page WP:Referencing for beginners. Feel free to ask more questions if you are still confused. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 12:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

thanks!! Buer.asd (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Doppelganger account?

Could you confirm that this account is indeed a doppelganger? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 04:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

@LilianaUwU yes Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 05:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Njedeh Anthony

Hello Carpimaps I wanted to create a stub article of Njedeh Anthony, is there way I could categorize it stub section, other wikipedia contributors may expand it. Nanyutterman (talk) 07:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

@Nanyutterman Yes. You can select a template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types that matches the topic of the article. Then you can put it on the bottom of the stub page you are making. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 11:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Will it be right to move it to wikipedia mainspace after adding it to stub category Nanyutterman (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

If you are referring to Draft:Njedeh Anthony, no. The draft needs to show that it is notable. Please follow the feedback I gave you on the last review. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 00:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello Carpimaps I have managed to to replace the IMDb links with better sources from google. Nanyutterman (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

@Nanyutterman, Google is not a source. It is a search engine. Also, the IMdB links are just one of the problems the draft had. Right now, the draft does not show that the subject is notable. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 09:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

I have seen many pages with google links as sources like Zeb Ejiro . Nanyutterman (talk) 09:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

The Google Search links in that article should be deleted. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 10:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Question from Cococolajourneys about Draft:Delta Lake (Software)

Hey! You mentioned "After the copyright purge, this draft is not publishable." Looks like I goofed on the copyright originally for the icon in Draft:Delta Lake (Software), but I have it fixed now. Everything in that project is in the Apache 2.0 License and I have re-uploaded the image to reflect that with the appropriate copyright tag. Is that what you were referring to? What can I do to fix this? Cococolajourneys (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Cococolajourneys, the reason I declined the draft has nothing to do with the images. At the time, bulk of the text was copied from other websites, making the draft a coptright violation. Because of this, an administrator deleted the offending text, which left the article extremely short. That is what I meant by "copyright purge". I suggest you add more quality sources to the draft (WP:42 is a helpful guide) to establish notability. Cheers, Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 02:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

CDIAL Page

Thank you for you review. I will appreciate any pointer to improve the page. Jwlkr12 (talk) 22:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Do you have any further updates on the review? Jwlkr12 (talk) 02:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Draft:IECEP-KSA-CRC

Hello @Carpimaps, Thank you for the review of my article. I have made some changes based on your suggestion. Would you be so kind to review once again. FrederickRoxas (talk) 05:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Reviewed Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 08:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. Regarding the reference and sources, #4 mentioned our organization's contribution to Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and Accreditation Program in an article. #6 our Founder Mr. Mario Balboa is recognized in one of the most respectable newspapers in Saudi Arabia. #8 Our founder Mr. Mario Balboa is recognized in The Filipino Times Magazine of United Arab Emirates. As per Vital Role, our organization helps fellow foreign worker to elevate their profession. For example, we help the technician to become an engineer or non-college graduate to achieve a college degree. Can you please advise how I can improve my article to be accepted? FrederickRoxas (talk) 09:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

I left a feedback along my review. Please contact me again if you are confused. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 10:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

My reply above is based on your comment. "Regarding the reference and sources, #4 mentioned our organization's contribution to Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and Accreditation Program in an article. #6 our Founder Mr. Mario Balboa is recognized in one of the most respectable newspapers in Saudi Arabia. #8 Our founder Mr. Mario Balboa is recognized in The Filipino Times Magazine of United Arab Emirates. As per Vital Role, our organization helps fellow foreign worker to elevate their profession. For example, we help the technician to become an engineer or non-college graduate to achieve a college degree." FrederickRoxas (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

• #4 is the organization's website, not independent.
• #6 is about Mario Balboa, and has no information on the organization itself, failing to be significant coverage.
• #8 is again about Mario Balboa, not the organization

I recommend that you read the guidance at WP:42. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 10:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Clifford Beal

Googling my name, I've become aware of a draft page about me and that it has been refused publication due to a problem with sources. I've had a look at the criticisms and don't see that the sources referenced have a direct connection with me (other than my own website). I have many journalist and author colleagues who have wikipedia entries and their references are similar in nature. I'd appreciate some feedback on what else could be referenced as most of these are already from publishers, newspapers, and television. As an internationally published author since 2007 with several titles I'm at a loss to see why this entry was refused. 2A02:C7C:DE5B:F00:6009:FD53:32D9:C9B1 (talk) 10:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Wikipedia has a set of inclusion criteria, which are named notability. In the draft's current state, it fails to show how you are notable. This does not mean that you are inherently not notable; an article about you can be published if you can find the right sources.

General Notability Guideline (GNG) suggests that

A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

Interviews are not independent. Rest are reviews of your books, and contains minimal biographical information, thus failing to be a significant coverage. I do not recommend you edit the draft as it comes with conflict of interest issues. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 10:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

One thing you can do though is provide sources that meets the GNG criteria. WP:42 is a helpful summary of rules that make up notability. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 10:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. I will try and add some references to existing piece. That said I find the following wiki rule regarding notability of authors and journos: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series). I believe my published works already prove this and have been quoted by independent media. 2A02:C7C:DE5B:F00:6009:FD53:32D9:C9B1 (talk) 11:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for responding, but none of your books have a Wikipedia article. However, it could be that no one have gotten around to creating one.

Besides, Subject-specific Notability Guidelines does not override General Notability Guidelines. It just means that if you meet one of the criteria, you have a high chance of passing GNG. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 11:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

"Quelch's Gold" is referenced in wikipedia article on John Quelch (which I did not originate). John Quelch (pirate)

I have now added additional third party references and hope the draft can be reconsidered. It is already far more extensive than many other authors up on wikipedia now. 2A02:C7C:DE5B:F00:6009:FD53:32D9:C9B1 (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Question from Fatimahadli (11:30, 13 June 2023)

fungsi bahan isian dalam komposit --Fatimahadli (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't speak Indonesian, sorry. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 11:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Review Request

Please have a look at my latest revisions to the final paragraph of my article Carlos_E._Cortés. Thank you. Bilaterian (talk) 14:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Reviewed! Good job on that article! Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 00:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Review Request

Please look at Draft:Traumpalast Leonberg IMAX Theater. Thanks.--208.84.93.25 (talk) 16:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, a reviewer will come review your draft soon. Please be patient. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 17:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Stuart Land

Hello you previously declined an article that didn't have according to you have reliable sources.

The person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. This bieng his art being in major blockbuster films. Studios zealously guard the length of the tail credits of a film and for this he was not credited in most of them as an artist. Most artist arnt credited but none the less he made unique contributions to critical acclaimed movies.

The person has received a well-known and significant award or honour, or has been nominated for such an award several times. This being his screen play awards. He has won significant awards in writing screrenplays that being the reviewers choice award.

Multiple independent sources are used may be combined to demonstrate notability. Primary sources are original materials that are close to an event. His audio interview regarding his work in blockbuster films should be enough for that. However there are other sources cited for additional proof.   

Creative professional. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work. The movies hes helped create and his interviews regarding them. 27.32.118.9 (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

While that may be true, you still need to prove that he has received those awards. Goodreads, IMDb, and Amazon links are not reliable sources. Also, I couldn't find a Wikipedia article for any of the awards mentioned. Are you sure that they can be classified "well-known and significant award or honour"? Even if this subject was notable. Vast majority of text are cited to unreliable sources or no sources at all. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 03:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Balázs Trencsényi

Hi, I just added some sources to meet the criterion no. 7 "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." 62.99.145.254 (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I wouldn't say giving few interviews gives "substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." Most of them are about the school and not his academic capacity(history). What reviewers are looking for are reputable and respected sources that say Balázs Trencsényi is a important person or made contributions that significantly changed the world. I think you will have better luck trying to satisfy WP:Anybio. Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 00:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Balázs Trencsényi has been elected as a member of Academia Europaea. 62.99.145.254 (talk) 06:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Also, not related to the membership of Academia Europaea, Specific criteria notes no. 7, a. says "

1. Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark.

He has been interviewed by outlines of at least 5 languages, some quoted a few sentences, some are lengthy interview. 62.99.145.254 (talk) 06:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. I will be accepting your draft. I somehow did not notice that Academia Europaea membership. Thank you for you contribution to Wikipedia! Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 06:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

References

Draft: Kenny J. Seymour

Thanks Carpimaps for your review and improvement tips for my draft article. I'll make the changes you recommended and resubmit for your review. Bksaunders (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome! Ca^{talk to me!} 13:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Vividh Bharti Radio Washington, D.C.

I was surprised to see this COI mess be approved at draft stage—that's why it's been moved back. Why was this draft accepted? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

I accepted the draft because it appeared to be notable. It was covered by two news organization with significant coverage and I did not see any overtly promotional wording. Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm actually struggling to find in-depth references. The Outlook one seems to conflate the original show, which apparently? ended in 2002????, with what the daughter (whose name is similar to that of the article creator) is doing now. The WaPo piece is a real oddball. It has the disclaimer All articles are written by YJDP Student Correspondents and edited by mentors from The Washington Post prior to publishing. on it, it was written by a high schooler, and I suspect based on the names involved that Nik is Nita's brother or maybe her son. The third piece is a CNN interview. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out. I agree with the draftification. I should have examined the The Outlook piece more closely. Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Rejection of Taglab draft page

Hi, I have seen the rejection of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TagLab (after 4 months), but beside the template, the comment just says "Please find more sources that devote significant coverage(not just namedrops)" and I find difficult to understand this motivation. The research centers cited in the articles are not just random namedrops, they are backed by at least three scientific papers that describe the use of the software there. What is exactly needed more? A longer description of how the software is used by the research center? Please could you elaborate what is needed according your opinion? because that comment does not really help to understand how to improve the page. Thanks in advance! ALoopingIcon (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

@ALoopingIcon Hello, thanks for reaching out to me. Citations one to two were the Taglab's own paper/Github(not independent). Citation three to four were just announcements saying that they use Taglab without any additional information. Since I saw that rest of the citation wasn't supporting anything substantial, I assumed they were of same quality. However, I went through the sources again, and surprisingly found detailed coverage of this software. I apologize, it was my mistake. Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the quick answer and thanks for accepting the page as a stub! Just another question, What are in your opinion the parts of the article that need to be extended/deepened in order to improve it and remove the stub tag?

- longer descriptions of it is actually used (e.g. monitoring coral reefs by analyizing photorecnostructied ortophoto)

- Software details (what kind of functionality the tool offer)

- more screenshot?

Suggestions are welcome! :) ALoopingIcon (talk) 06:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I recommend you read other software-related articles that have been designated by the community as "good articles". [1] Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Moonmoon draft

Hello, I would like to know what certain sections I can improve on my Moonmoon article. I do personally see that there are things wrong with the article but I can't really identify them. What certain sentences or references can I perhaps change or remove? Could I perhaps make one area better? I am engrossed by this article and would love to see what's wrong and if there can be any improvements that can be made. Thanks. JabirAV (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Currently, I see that none of the sources form a coherent biography. The Dot ESport citations are low-quality since it is simply reporting/summarizing on Moonmoon's streams. What the draft needs is a source that focuses on Moonmoon himself, not individual streams and events. I un-rejected the draft so you can submit it again. See articles like Technoblade for an excellent example. Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Formatting section links

I have started a discussion at User talk:MaterialWorks#Formatting section links regarding their edits that add {{section link}} that you may be interested in. I suggest caution in editing pages that may link to archiveable sections; see the discussion for more info. isaacl (talk) 21:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CloudPanel

Hello Ca,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CloudPanel for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want CloudPanel to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Le Soir de Rezonville

Hello, you declined the article based on source reliability. The text is full of notes with quotes and sources. This article is currently the most comprehensive resource of this works and would benefit from the wikipedia sharing to complete the inventory of the fragments in private hands. Mrzoofer (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, many sections does not have references. For examples, the "Current owners" section is four paragraphs without any sources. Secondly, "La Justice, 1 juillet 1887" is not a proper citation. Please don't use french dates and give title, author name, etc. Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Ok this is corrected but out of an article over several pages that people could use and complement, I think it's a harsh decision to just reject on 3 citations missing a forgetting to translate one date from French to English (for your information, la Justice was a leading newspaper in France in the 19th century) 213.78.111.51 (talk) 18:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, the missing translation was not the reason for my decline. It is that many statements lack citation. Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft:CHINT Group

Please take a look again, iv added a few new references which indirectly describe the subject of the article. Also, please note that the company and its SEO in press releases are not written by garbage blogs, but by respected publications such as Bloomberg, Forbes, etc.

Thank for advance and have a good day. LTTB (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I think you are misunderstanding the meaning of press release. It is news provided by the company so it would not be an independent source. I am not sure what you mean by "SEO in press releases". Bloomberg and Forbes are reliable sources. However, the sources need to have significant and in-depth coverage on the topic to establish notability. Simple database entries are not enough. Please take a look at the guidance at WP:42. For a quicker review, can you tell me what you believe to be the best three citations that establish notability? Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your advance. I will rework an article a little bit, and try to find better references. Have a good day LTTB (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Also added a few referenses from the Chinese press LTTB (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Saribek Sukiasyan

Hello Ca, thank you for your comment. Please tell me what type of sources should I add ? My all sources are reliable, because they all are articles from Armenian news sites, or I have sources from the websites of the Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen of Armenia where is showing that he is a member of the Presidium.

@User:Anavean, this article needs sources that are independent and has significant coverage. Definition of independent sources are outlined at WP:IIS. Significant coverage means more than just a passing mention. Sources simply stating this person is a member of x is not enough. Take 3 paragraphs as a rule of thumb. Feel free to ask more questions! Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I want to know if the articles presented in the form of an interview can be considered reliable? Anavean (talk) 07:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Password Game gameplay.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Password Game gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ObserveOwl (talk) 10:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Ca, just a quick thank you for your revert in Trusted Shops. I have to admit that even as an old wikipedian it's not always straightforward how to stick best to all WP policies. So while I tried to figure out the correct way to address this, you were quicker :-). Avatar (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome :D Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Stefan Brunnhuber

Hi Ca, thank you for your feedback to my draft. I had translated most of the content from the German article after reading a book by Mr. Brunnhuber and therefore apparently I didn't pay enough attention to the details. I have now tried to incorporate your feedback: Reduced the main text (without sourcing) and added additional sources. It seems that some details are only available from the CV but most key data is included in the Club of Rome / other profiles and articles. If you deem it okay this way, maybe you can speed the review up (so I don't have to wait another few months)? Thank you kindly Psreplay (talk) 07:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Sure, I will review the draft right now. Thank you for contacting me. Ca ^{talk to me!} 09:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Good catch

I am glad you noticed this [2]. It seems you were able to restore the AfD? ---Steve Quinn (talk) 17:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

John Kiramis

Hi Ca, thank you for your feedback to my draft. you review on my draft 2 weeks ago and declined you mentioned writing error and not reliable source about the draft thank you. I recently did some corrections in my draft and I found some new links you mentioned on Google and California Digital Newspaper Collection and also images on google and many articles about the main article so please can you review it again Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 03:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Ca thank you for you feedback I am so sorry I mistakenly cite the search page instead of article page I just change that thank you you mention that and also I remove that part you mention before in you comment thank you man can you check that citation I just change California Digital Newspaper Collection page on John Kiramis that page clearly mention his presence in the newspaper i think with this citation it is now eligible to publish Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) Ab.Haris999 (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft Corrections: Concept Space

Hi Carpimaps,

Thank you for reviewing my article (Draft:Concept space).

You were concerned that the subject seemed like original research. I really think that concept space is now beyond original research, as we can find this knowledge system in use in a few colleges and universities now, and it has been published in peer reviewed papers and conferences in the last 5 years. Here is how I tried to improve the article, but if you can give me some more directions, I would very much appreciate your help.

1. I verified which references that directly talk about concept space are peer reviewed. All of them actually are peer reviewed:

a. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)

b. Advances in Engineering Education

c. AIPU

2. I added a secondary source of a scientific paper that presents concept space in its literature review. It presents the ability of Concept Space to connect prior knowledge: prasetya2020

3. I added in the history section that the term “extended concept map” has been used in earlier literature (such as in foley2018).

4. The reference to “Chase et al., 1973” was intended to support the part about chunking. I think the reference might not have been obvious enough, so I focused on the subject of chunking and used a more obvious reference: thalmann2019. I did not elaborate more on chunking though, because the wikipedia page for it is very good I think.

5. I changed the title “Foundations and principles” to “Characteristics of Concept Space”, because I could not find a reference that tells that they are “the 4 principles”, but I think that the references are good to support that they are 4 important characteristics of concept space.

6. I removed a few phrases that I think were not verifiable enough, and I attached references in more places to make it easier to track the sources.

Thank you. LunaHP1234 (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Requesting Adivce for IP block

First, thank you for revewing the Zomi Town, Tulsa articles. I have a question. I can edit and write new articles, but can't upload image. I have to use VPN for the wikipedia is banned in my country. Could you please give an advice. Thank you. JAMB2023 (talk) 08:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

@JAMB2023 Hello, thanks for reaching out to me. I don't really know much about blocks, but the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption appears to be related. If you are still unsure, I recommend you ask at WP:Teahouse. Ca ^{talk to me!} 08:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)