User talk:CarterFromSL

Welcome CarterFromSL!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,448,742 registered editors!

Hello, CarterFromSL. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jeph Maystruck

Hello, CarterFromSL, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username BoyTheKingCanDance, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jeph Maystruck, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeph Maystruck.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoyTheKingCanDance: I appreciate your diligence, though perhaps a bit heavy handed. Jeph is at very least a well-known public figure in Saskatchewan, especially in the business, marketing, and education spheres.

CarterFromSL (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landon Jorgenson (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is too heavily based on primary sources that are not support for notability. For example, four of the seven footnotes are to IMDB, which is not a reliable or notability-building source: you do not make a filmmaker notable by referencing his films to their IMDb profiles as verification that they exist, you make a filmmaker notable by referencing his films to third party media coverage and analysis about the films (film reviews by professional film critics, etc.) as proof that they received media attention. And the SaskMusic reference is also not notability-supporting coverage, but is just a press release from an organization directly affiliated with the claim.
Only two footnotes here come from real media, but they still aren't helping much either: one just briefly mentions his name in the context of directing a local theatre production in his hometown (which is not inherently notable at all), and the other just briefly mentions the name of a film he worked on without mentioning his name at all. We're not just looking for sources that happen to have his name (or the names of his films) in them, we're looking for sources in which he and his films are the subject of analysis.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Landon Jorgenson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CarterFromSL! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William Lovelace VI

Hello, CarterFromSL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Lovelace VI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Landon Jorgenson

Hello, CarterFromSL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Landon Jorgenson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William Lovelace VI

Hello, CarterFromSL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William Lovelace VI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kristjan Hebert.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kristjan Hebert.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 00:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Landon Jorgenson

Hello, CarterFromSL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Landon Jorgenson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CarterFromSL. Thank you for your work on Kristjan Hebert. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks!!

CarterFromSL (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]