Jump to content

User talk:Charles01/Archive 39

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editing News #2—2016

[edit]

Editing News #2—2016 Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

It's quick and easy to insert a references list.

Screenshot showing a dropdown menu with many items

Place the cursor where you want to display the references list (usually at the bottom of the page). Open the "Insert" menu and click the "References list" icon (three books).

If you are using several groups of references, which is relatively rare, you will have the opportunity to specify the group. If you do that, then only the references that belong to the specified group will be displayed in this list of references.

Finally, click "Insert" in the dialog to insert the References list. This list will change as you add more footnotes to the page.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Arabic and Indic scripts, and adapting the visual editor to the needs of the Wikivoyages and Wikisources.

Recent changes

[edit]

The visual editor is now available to all users at most Wikivoyages. It was also enabled for all contributors at the French Wikinews.

The single edit tab feature combines the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. It has been deployed to several Wikipedias, including Hungarian, Polish, English and Japanese Wikipedias, as well as to all Wikivoyages. At these wikis, you can change your settings for this feature in the "Editing" tab of Special:Preferences. The team is now reviewing the feedback and considering ways to improve the design before rolling it out to more people.

Future changes

[edit]

The "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including: Arabic, Hindi, Thai, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Urdu, Persian, Bengali, Assamese, Aramaic and others.

The team is working with the volunteer developers who power Wikisource to provide the visual editor there, for opt-in testing right now and eventually for all users. (T138966)

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. It will look like the visual editor, and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices around September 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Let's work together

[edit]

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 21:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcellus Schiffer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allan Gray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New version of File:Fiat Ritmo prefacelifts 105TC (performance version).jpg uploaded to Commons

[edit]

Hi again,

I thought you ought to know that I've uploaded a filtered version of one of your images to Commons. The new version has been uploaded under the separate filename File:Fiat Ritmo prefacelifts 105TC (performance version) (filtered).jpg along with a list of the changes made and a disclaimer regarding the accuracy.

(Though I should make clear that I've tried to stick to global changes and avoid anything that veers towards selective retouching. This might have have improved the neutrality of the shadows, but- for me- would have crossed the line away from any claim to be an accurate representation of the original at all).

Hope you don't mind this, let me know if there are any problems. All the best!

Ubcule (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Interesting. It certainly looks a bit sharper. And you seem to have given it a slightly red tint, as though it were taken towards the end of the afternoon. I'm afraid I no longer have any memory from which to know which is the "truer" presentation. But thanks for removing the speck of dust above the headlight. I think - if cautiously - your version is an improvement, and you have not "over-improved" it to the point where it looks unrealistic. That's important. So thank you. I confess, I think that if your theme is Fiat Ritmos, the one I took in the Netherlands is a nicer picture - more interesting colo(u)r and less distractingly aggressive background. And a marginally better angle. BUT (1) these things are very much a matter of personal taste and (2) the one I took in Italy - I think probably in Rome - has greater wiki-rarity value because it's of the 105TC. It's certainly the one people seem to have picked up on for wiki-articles.
No further thoughts. Happy Sunday. Charles01 (talk) 18:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It hasn't been explicitly sharpened as such; I'm guessing one or more of the filters just brought things out that way. My aim was really just to move the colour away from the green, reduce the contrast and to enhance the shadow detail that already existed in your photo without explicit retouching.
Sorry about the pinkish areas; I wasn't entirely happy with that, but the green tint wasn't entirely linear (especially not in the darker areas), so it was an unfixable "remainder" after it was mostly balanced out.
(I own the same scanner model; when I had problems with it, someone noted the Plustek was quite nonlinear in its colour response. Then again, I wasn't about to spend the time and money needed to profile it, especially as I'd finished scanning most of my poxy slides!)
Your other photo is great too, though I have to admit I'm not as big a fan of the later Stradas and Ritmos themselves; they (intentionally) mainstreamed and blanded out the styling of the original models.
Thanks for the great images. All the best! Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree about the way marketing departments spoil the looks of clean designs when they do the Mark 2 versions. If - as I infer - you live in England, you will probably share my view that it's not a uniquely Fiat problem. Hillman Hunter, Volvo 144/164, Ford Sierra, Triumph & Rover 2000, SD1, BMC AD016 .... in fact almost anything BMC did in the 1960s and 70s - all reasonably coherent designs that became less coherent when some committee of car haters in the marketing department basement signed off on a Mark II version. Sorry, I really need to go off and do something useful. Regards Charles01 (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julian King (diplomat), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Les Échos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gear

[edit]

You're right, a spectacularly handsome car. Can't say that about the next one. (This next is entirely from memory of the mid-70s) VW were at a total loss for a new model and losing sales fast. Auto-Union were in deep trouble too but financial and they had designed a new small car. So VW bought AU and the new car and rushed it into production and it was almost ecstatically greeted. Does WP say anything like that? From over here things sound calm enough, (i.e. no noticeable noise at all, I mean normal volume) are you going to stick with the current residence or cross Channel? regards, Eddaido (talk) 08:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the crisis at VW in the 1970s, there's a certain amount on it in the entry of Rudolf Leiding which appears to have benefitted from sourcing to one or two contemporary articles. Feel free to improve.
On the Brexit future of Britain, ... well, at the end of 1970s we ended thirty years of relative economic decline thanks to (1) Margaret Thatcher, (2) North Sea Oil and (3) EEC membership. Not necessarily (almost certainly not) in that order. Since then the Brits have become, relatively, a whole lot more prosperous, and have come to hold the political class in ever greater contempt, which seems to correlate with a rapid retreat from parliamentary democracy - delegated legislation and cronyism and all that - and the inexplicable launch of the war in the Middle East. The future? There seems to be some sort of a sudden change of direction emerging in the economic data, but on the political front no one brought along a map. Also, probably it's off topic. But the only way the parliamentarians over here get a cheer these days is by telling "the people" there are too many of them. That's parliamentarians. Which given that they no longer do very much in terms of holding governments to account is probably fair enough; but even a fig leaf legislature needs to be populated with something. Anyhow, the politicians have gone back to talking about (1) fracking and (2) themselves this weekend. As who would not? Happy days. Charles01 (talk) 08:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have read as suggested and I see I was wrong to believe the AU purchase was in the early 1970s, it had been well settled in the portfolio by then. I think you are a very good encapsulator, I suppose that would be well exercised by the translations. I hope Leiding, who might have been as much as 60, went away happily and had a comfortable retirement he must have been good at his job.
Nervous because I am amending (your) Sunbeam Talbot(s) in the light of further info and I believe some mis-identified photos but I came here about your new photos. Just please fix it where ever i take the article off the rails. Its b* cold here — by local standards. Hope you are all warm and sunny. Eddaido (talk) 09:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Daimler Benz had acquired Auto Union under pressure from an over-influential (?well ... anyway) shareholder in 1958, but DB's more pressing priority, naturally enough, was their own cars. Also the old Auto Union factories in Zwickau had ended up on the "wrong" side of the line, so trying to figure out what to do with what was left cannot have been easy. On the other hand, by the time they sold the business to Volkswagen - I think maybe in 1964 - DB had funded investment in the new generation of Audis and - possibly even more importantly - in the Inglostadt plant where they would assemble the things. When VW purchased Audi I sometimes wonder whether what they really had their eye on was extra production capacity for building Beetles that they were keen to get their hands one. But indeed, a couple of years later it was (further reworked and modernised versions of) the cars designed to come out of Ingolstadt that saved their bacon. On Sunbeam Talbots, I'll take a look but don't plan to "jump in". I'm sure anything you do will be an improvement. I get hopelessly confused through all the ownership changes for Sunbeam, and I have just a slight sense that if you look at French sources all the Darracq side of things, and indeed the Tony Lago stuff, look completely ... um ... different. Success Charles01 (talk) 09:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johann Georg Rist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altona. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kurt Sitte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Buffalo and Albany. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

[edit]

Hi there. I've started a new initiative, the Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. It's a long term goal to bring about 10,000 article improvements to the UK and Ireland. Through two contests involving just six or seven weeks of editing so far we've produced over 1500 improvements. Long term if we have more people chipping it and adding articles they've edited independently as well from all areas of the UK then reaching that target is all possible. I think it would be an amazing achievement to see 10,000 article improvements by editors chipping in. If you support this and think you might want to contribute towards this long term please sign up in the Contributors section. No obligations, just post work on anything you feel like whenever you want, though try to avoid basic stubs if possible as we're trying to reduce the overall stub count and improve general comprehension and quality. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a nice initiative, though as usual (well, often ... ) there's abundant scope for time-wasting differences of opinion on the ticklish business of definition. I'm still recovering from the insight that systematic bias means there aren't enough contributions about women. All too true, and it would be wonderful if life could be so simple, but there's a whole lot more to systematic bias than that back on the planet where I came from. I think the larger issue may be what, currently, we are encouraged to call "group think". Anyhow, I'll take a longer look at the 10,000 Challenge page later.
Right now I'm solemnly working through car pictures suitable (or not) for Commons, but I'll be back to concentrating my wiki time on translation in the next day or too. (I sense you are not so very interested in cars ... so sad!)
Success Charles01 (talk) 13:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl Adolph Cornelius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmerich. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunbeam-Talbot Ten

[edit]

Was indeed thinking of your good work as I fiddled with this article but I had not taken on board the very recent amendment by your own hand. Had I understood that I'd have left things as they were, now I might have been over-specific so please change it back agin if you wish to. regards, Eddaido (talk) 03:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. But of course if I notice anything capable of improvement ... well, never say never, but I think you have a pretty firm handle on this. Success Charles01 (talk) 06:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

French abbreviationary practices

[edit]

Good morning Charles. Can you tell me if it is correct to believe as I do that Citroën S.A. is just the same as Société Anonyme Citroën but a short form and is used in the way we might use Bloggs Ltd in place of Bloggs Limited or do I have all that all wrong? I consider particularly Talbot, Darracq etc. Yr advice please, regards, Eddaido (talk) 23:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, yes; though I'd have to see it in context to be more sure. I think plc might be a better analogy. I can just about think of "the public liability company Unilever" aka "Unilever plc", whereas "the limited liability company Soapsuds" aka "Soap suds Ltd" looks somehow less satisfying. Don't attempt to follow me down that track, though, and certainly don't pick me up on failure to capitalise the first letter as appropriate. That's a different conversation and it's a bit early, still, here. Best Charles01 (talk) 06:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfonso Paso
added a link pointing to Broadway
Cecil Tyndale-Biscoe
added a link pointing to Holton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Knut Folkerts

[edit]

Thank you very much for your work on this article. Regards--Buchbibliothek (talk) 21:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. And thank you for noticing. There's still more to be done I think, and there might be more useful information to be mined from the sources already cited (and/or from others accessible online using Google); but I do think it's maybe easier to follow than it was for an English language mother-tongue speaker.
And EVERY wiki entry (almost) is still only a work in progress. But still they only give us 24 hours each day. Success Charles01 (talk) 06:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pio Turroni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles01/Archive_39&oldid=827022145"