User talk:Chigsee

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Chigsee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --James, La gloria è a dio 20:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Taylor Hayes (The Bold and the Beautiful) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Vishnava_talk 01:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging Angela Forrester for further review

Hello, Chigsee … I recently encountered the article about Angela Forrester and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Fiction, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor. —triwbe (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Torres Evans

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maria Torres Evans, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Maria Torres. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maria Torres has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 23:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Maria Torres constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ollie Fury _Contribs 23:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rachel Armstrong (Home and Away Character)

A tag has been placed on Rachel Armstrong (Home and Away Character), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ethan Black (Home and Away)

I have nominated Ethan Black (Home and Away), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Black (Home and Away). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 11:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

‎List of weddings on the Bold and the Beauiful

Beauiful? Bazj (talk) 10:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Belle Taylor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 13:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of weddings on The Bold and the Beautiful for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weddings on The Bold and the Beautiful is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weddings on The Bold and the Beautiful until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 04:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spectra

Template:Spectra has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]