User talk:Chris ozog

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Woody Allen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —BorgHunter (talk) 00:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The writing of hoax articles is not allowed anywhere, including on your user page. Please see the user page guidelines for appropriate use of a user page. Continuing to deliberately write false information will result in a block from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 22:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hahachrisozogrules.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hahachrisozogrules.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 08:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As you are clearly not here to contribute constructively, you have been blocked from editing indefinitely. You may request to be unblocked using the syntax {{unblock|your reason here}}, but may wish to read our guide to appealing blocks first. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris ozog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for any inconvenience I have caused and it is unfortunate that this block has occurred. However, I would like to state that my user-created page was intended for the sole purpose of profiling and not to offend any administrators here at wikipedia.org. I wasn't aware that these actions that I followed through with would be detrimental to others and mislead audiences. My actions were done, to create an information page about myself, the user, yet be satirical and NOT trick others into thinking these things I posted. I sincerely believe that, in the process of creating the page, that since this was "my user page" so I truly believed that not many would be bothered to view the page, so it wouldn't have been a problem, and again, I apologize if I did so in the past. Please take into consideration that this "vandalism" was done so unintentionally and inadvertently, if possible, I would appreciate it if you would unblock my account. This will not happen again if given a second chance Thank you, Chris Ozog.

Decline reason:

Even ignoring your user page, every single edit you have made to the site has been vandalism. You need to acknowledge that before you can be unblocked. Golbez (talk) 10:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Chris ozog.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chris ozog.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rafiquddininaction.jpg

The file File:Rafiquddininaction.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]