User talk:CowHouse

North Korea

North Korea Which is a Member of the ASEAN Regional Forum Must Become a Member of the Asia-Europe Meeting as Part of Relaxation or Détente Between North Korea and the ASEM Member States by Ending Decades of the Said Country's Isolation with the ASEM Members and Kim Jong Un will be Invited at the Thirteenth ASEM Summit in Cambodia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4454:296:900:FC24:F634:B4D4:C3DA (talk) 03:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MNNA

Brunei Darussalam and Colombia Will Become a Major Non-NATO Ally Because they are Friends to the United States Brunei Darussalam is a US Ally Since 1845 via the Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Commerce and Navigation signed by the Two Countries in 1850, also the Brunei Darussalam and the United States of America Have a Defence Relations Because of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Military and Defense Cooperation in 1994 Which the Two Countries resulted in joint exercises, training programs, and other forms of military cooperation between the Two Countries, and Also the Two Countries Have an Economic Relations Because It Is Part of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Colombia is Also a US Ally Because It Is the Only Latin American Country That Send Its Armed Forces Into the Korean War. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4454:296:900:600A:46B0:FDEB:72FB (talk) 08:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, CowHouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Iambic Pentameter _{(talk / contribs)} 17:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A possible sockpuppet is vandalizing the Jimmy Dore page.

it's claiming that information showing Dore crazy viewpoints is slanderous, Slanderous is a term dore uses to defend himself against criticism, also the ip address traces back to Pasadena, which is where dore lives. http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/138.229.221.104 Jaydogg1994 (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is suspicious that the account has only edited the Jimmy Dore page, but I'm not sure that it's a sock-puppet account. Dore tends to prefer the term "smear", so I don't think it's him. Anyway, I've got the page on my watchlist so I'm happy to revert any vandalism.

I thought they might have been genuine about the source being misrepresented, but I re-worded it so it is essentially identical with the wording of the article. Whoever they are, it's clear they're going to continue vandalising the page unless it gets protected. I would protect the page if I was able but unfortunately I'm not a sysop.

By the way, your edit says "he later released a video". This is inaccurate since the video you cited is from April 2016 (so it is earlier, not later). CowHouse (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They removed my edits and told me I would get blocked if I tried again, I need your help. Jaydogg1994 (talk) 01:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of people on the talk page favoured removing it, and Wikipedia is very careful about BLP violations. There's nothing I can do. Ultimately, there's more important things to worry about. CowHouse (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Jaydogg1994 (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CowHouse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CowHouse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little Saint James, U.S. Virgin Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mar a Lago

It's literally in the first paragraph in a ref still linked in the page. How is that not related? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.246.203 (talk) 01:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I never claimed it was not in the source, but the page is about the island. There are many things in that article that do not belong on that specific page. CowHouse (talk) 09:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What happened on the island originated from there, though, so there is a connection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.246.203 (talk) 21:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello CowHouse, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions alert for Covid-19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 11:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thank you so much for spending the time to rewrite my Li-Meng Yan contribution properly! That was generous of you. I learned a lot from all of this and will get it right in the future. Chiffball (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Li-Meng Yan

I appreciate your contributions editing the Li-Meng Yan article. Thank you.Oceanflynn (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on MEDRS/RS debate regarding fringe lab leak theory

Your comment on whether MEDRS are mandatory before editing a claim implying the lab leak theory is not a conspiracy/fringe idea is requested by this Diff in this page, please take a look. Forich (talk) 02:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorporating your D.1 option and your reasons for it into the already active section

Hi, please feel free to incorporate your options into that list as you see fit. I would ask that you please not change the options I already set out, which are already very broad, but instead just add narrower sub-options for your preferred inclusion. Feel free to add your own reasoning etc. as you see fit, it doesn't bother me at all to have you do that. And feel free to edit the way I included your D.1 option, again totally doesn't bother me. But per WP:TALK, we shouldn't create new sections when the existing one is perfectly fine and not overly long. Instead, centralized discussion is preferred to allow everyone to consider the options as they exist and review the discussion as it has happened so far. I don't think you were doing anything wrong, necessarily, but it does make things more messy and makes achieving any consensus more difficult. Talk page discussions should be angled towards achieving a consensus with all available options.--Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 15:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of COVID-19 Discretionary Sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Every 12 months, these alerts need to be renewed. Plus these are now DS, not just GS.--Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 18:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Tracey (journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Tracey (journalist), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tracey (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]