User talk:CreatCats
Religion categories
[edit]I've removed Category:Ghanaian Muslims from a bunch of articles about living people, mostly footballers, that you added. (At least I think most were added by you. You added one, and an anonymous IP address added the others—I'm assuming that was you prior to your signing in.) Please note the following excerpt from WP's policy on biographies of living persons:
- "Category tags regarding religious beliefs and sexual orientation should not be used unless two criteria are met:
- "The subject publicly self-identifies with the belief or orientation in question;
- "The subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to the subject's notable activities or public life, according to reliable published sources."
- "Category tags regarding religious beliefs and sexual orientation should not be used unless two criteria are met:
The fact that these people are Muslim was not even mentioned in the articles in question, much less proven to be a matter of self-identification or relevant to their notable activities. Thanks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
[edit]Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Stephen Appiah. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BanRay 13:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Just a note
[edit]Please read this. BanRay 14:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Category
[edit]Hi; I've deleted Category:Kyrgyzstani Muslims since Category:Kyrgyz Muslims already exists and serves the same purpose. Thanks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Fictional Muslims
[edit]A tag has been placed on Fictional Muslims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Matt (Talk) 21:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi; these categories were deleted by consensus here, which is why they get deleted when you re-create them. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)