User talk:D. C. Thomas

Welcome!

Hello, D. C. Thomas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Umalee 00:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages...

Don't move pages just because your keyboard can't type French characters without discussing it first. And don't change links with such characters for the same reason. Redirects should be avoided. French names also constitute common use in many cases, including political parties such as the Bloc Québécois and universities such as Université du Québec à Montréal, and the name of actual people, except in rare exceptions (such as Celine Dion).--Boffob 22:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Montreal business people

Go read the talk page.--Boffob 20:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you did read it, why did you revert, without extra justification, to the versions with redirects, red links and without Pierre Péladeau, arguably a more important figure than his sons and many other article-less business people?--Boffob 20:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?? - without Pierre Péladeau? You don't make any sense.

Your last version; it has Érik and PKP, but not their father.--Boffob 20:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, just put it in, or anyone else who fits the list. That's simple enough. Thanks. D. C. Thomas 20:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I won't revert again. No point in edit warring, but please, don't leave red links. Write bio articles, even minimal ones, and make sure that your reverts are not indiscriminate, to avoid losing useful additions.--Boffob 21:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I really won't revert again this time, but if you decide to add your red links back, please keep the Pierre Péladeau link and the List of Montrealers as it is (not "of famous Montrealers" because that one redirects).--Boffob 00:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No one is compelled to write bio articles at Wikipedia and having red links for very important people is essential. Also, I just removed your "Weasel" notice you posted to the Quebec diaspora article. You put that in without stating it in your edit summary and never gave a reason why you reached this opinion on the Talk page that not only is appropriate, but common courtesy. I'm certain it wasn't your intention, but calling what seems like a clear and precise article with fully documented sources as "Weasel" could well be taken as an insult or the product of a specific motivation. Thanks again. D. C. Thomas 21:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I explained the change in the edit summary (just like I put a story tag on Ben's delicatessen article, because it has similar tone issues). Didn't get the time to say anything on the talk page, but thought the edit summary would be sufficient. You seem to be the one with a vendetta, but, please, do open a sockpuppetry case if you think I have any connection with User:Laval or anyone else.--Boffob 22:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My clear agenda is to uphold Wiki's policies of neutral point of view and quality standards. I get rid of red links and spam a lot, fix links that go through redirects and put up a number of cleanup tags. That one section of the Quebec diaspora article seems deliberately written to paint the English and Scot Quebecers as the only ones to contribute to the building and economic development of the province, and that they were unfairly driven out by FLQ terrorists and PQ government. I try not to get involved too much in political articles beyond putting tags, but I do believe this is a clear case of wrong tone because it waxes poetic about the history of a particular community. I put the story tag in the history section of Bens De Luxe Delicatessen & Restaurant for the exact same reason.--Boffob 00:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]