User talk:DMashak
|
The political machinations of Wikipedia
[edit]Wikipedia has become a steaming pile... Using tax dollars given to political operatives I will just call "Brown Shirts" Wikipedia does not represent a fair and balance edit. Middle Class people have to work at real jobs while Progressive Brown Shirts are paid to propagate progressive propaganda. Now they are inventing or reinventing something called Dual Federalism and denying USA is Representative Republic. Most descriptions Cite the Taney Court as the source of the theory of Dual Federalism. This is the same court that issued the Dred Scott decision finding that coloreds are to inferior to whites to be considered citizens... aka Institutionalized racism promoted by the Progressives.... And then they call TEA Party Racist. Please tell me how to turn my email to on. I rarely come to Wikipedia anymore, but just like to keep track of a few things to see what is going on in the alternate reality. And when I write, I cite. And when I cite, I only use the Wikipedia source if there are no other sources. Wikipedia has been hijacked by the Progressives and is nothing more than a propaganda instrument. Incidentally there are progressives in the Republican Party also. One better there is only one political party with two heads that they change from time to time to prevent violent revolution. The Wealthy and Powerful are still running the government regardless of which head is currently in charge. I agree our government is ruthless. Somehow my term Sovereign Citizens has been hijacked and is now under something about Tax Protesting Terrorists... Unbelievable I can't come back here very often because it rips my heart out. In America the truth is there now is no truth. Only Propaganda and different flavors of political koolaid. I wonder if this was the original intent of the creators of Wikipedia Those were my thoughts. user:CynicalPatriot 8/10/2010
Don't expect the left-wing political cabals to do you any favors. They are ruthless. They certainly won't send courtesy e-mails when they plan to delete a page. Just look at the way they are pushing their point of view (POV) on so many pages from everything from homosexuality, to abortion, to the Second Amendment. Hundreds of Wiki editors have grown tired of defending the neutrality of pages, and have switched to editing at other wikis, such as Conservapedia. I'm tempted to do likewise, but I guess I'm just stubborn, and I'm staying to counter their creeping gradualism. If unchecked, it will leave Wikipedia looking more like ACORNpedia. Trasel (talk) 17:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- The article in question was created by CynicalPatriot (talk · contribs) who was notified of the AfD. Notification is never done by email and I also note that neither this editor or Cynical Patriot even have email enabled. Email would be a very unreliable way to notify editors. I agree though that if you want to edit something with a conservative bias, Conservapedia is the place to go - just don't call it neutral because it obviously isn't and I presume doesn't claim to be. Dougweller (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
The article Representative Republic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsalvageable advocacy page.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)