User talk:DTejuja

September 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Siddharth Mallya does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —BarrelProof (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Siddharth Mallya, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.You seem to have ignored the above request. Your edits seem strongly biased to phrase the article with a promotional tone. Wikipedia articles should have a neutral point of view. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits of Vidyut Jamwal also appear to be extremely biased and promotional. This is not appropriate for Wikipedia. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Siddharth Mallya. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

Your edits continue to appear biased toward being promotional about the subject of the article, and you have not explained any of your edits with an WP:Edit summary or discussion on talk pages such as Talk:Siddharth Mallya. This is not appropriate. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DTejuja, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DTejuja! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Kailash29792. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kangana Ranaut without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. At least you could explain why you were removing the content. But you did not. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]