User talk:Daniel/Archive/110
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page. |
Glad to have had your message on my talk page the other day, Daniel :) I hope you're doing well - always makes me happy to have an interaction with someone I knew 10 - 15 years ago on here. It's great you're still active! Acalamari 21:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Couple of old-timers still kicking around causing chaos, we are! Great to see you too. Daniel (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Hey Daniel. Looking for your input as you're familiar with the topic and users involved. It seems that Maurice Novoa's page (that you originally deleted off an AfD) has been recreated with 98% identical text to when it was deleted, using User:Australianblackbelt's uploaded phots and suddenly has multiple editors editing in it. Clearly the page should be deleted again as it's a recreation of a deleted page with no substantial changes, but I'm also wondering if there is any sockpuppetry, or at least meat, from Australianblackbelt going on here. I'm happy to delete it myself, but I wanted a second opinion on the events surrounding it. Canterbury Tail talk 12:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sigh...yes, agree on both fronts. I've nominated for CSD G4 to get another set of eyes on it, but agree there's some sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry going on here. Daniel (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I saw that and I’ve just deleted it. It was almost identical to the old version. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t looking at it in a tainted manner. And yes I think there’s more going on here that needs looking into. Canterbury Tail talk 01:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- And the User: Agnez Mo fan just linked to the article from a load of Australianblackbelts favourite articles that someone wouldn’t just happen to stumble across. Seems pretty clear cut. Canterbury Tail talk 01:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorted. Checkusered and rendered as Probably, so they've been blocked. Canterbury Tail talk 14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Fantastic, thanks for that - definitely showed similar behavioural patterns, especially the gratuiotous linking to the article. If it gets recreated once more I'll be salting it I think. Daniel (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorted. Checkusered and rendered as Probably, so they've been blocked. Canterbury Tail talk 14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- And the User: Agnez Mo fan just linked to the article from a load of Australianblackbelts favourite articles that someone wouldn’t just happen to stumble across. Seems pretty clear cut. Canterbury Tail talk 01:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I saw that and I’ve just deleted it. It was almost identical to the old version. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t looking at it in a tainted manner. And yes I think there’s more going on here that needs looking into. Canterbury Tail talk 01:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
I was ruminating about what would be the best way to close this, and ended up putting it on my watchlist just to see how it would be handled. Just wanted to let you know, I think you did exactly the right thing, and I hope some of this wisdom will be absorbed by my tiny brain. Thanks for all you do around here. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but I have to disagree. Obviously, I'm INVOLVED, but I don't see how it can be closed as anything other than keep. None of the delete/redirect !voters did much of anything to explain how the links posted by 5225C and Jovanmilic97 didn't meet GNG; Drmies attempted, but using phrases like
The second, the Italian source, it's better
(while also misrepresenting the scope of the article, which he later doubled down on when corrected by HumanBodyPiloter5) andThe fourth, from Racer, that's OK
doesn't come off to me as very dismissive of them. - It has nothing to do with wanting
vindication of the article in the state it is in
. But AfD is not cleanup and GNG is not concerned with whether the sources are present in the article, but whether they exist (please correct me if I'm wrong here). - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 02:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]- GhostOfDanGurney, those sources are shit and you know it. A couple of websites, a few enthusiasts, and a shitload of little hobbyists' factoids, and there's your Wikipedia article. It's embarrassing--when some of us are trying to write quality content. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Lmao; you could have said all that in the discussion, you know? - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 02:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Drmies: With respect, it does not appear that you are familiar with motorsports articles and your evaluations of the outlets I (and others) presented seems completely divorced from how they are considered in reality. If multiple motorsports editors are telling you that this is coverage from outlets that are reliable and respected within the field, then you really ought to listen. 5225C (talk • contributions) 02:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- End of conversation here - go argue about it elsewhere. A lot of the conduct above is quite unbecoming. I'm not changing my close, if you have such a moral objection to it, deletion review is available to you. Daniel (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- GhostOfDanGurney, those sources are shit and you know it. A couple of websites, a few enthusiasts, and a shitload of little hobbyists' factoids, and there's your Wikipedia article. It's embarrassing--when some of us are trying to write quality content. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ferrari Challenge. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 04:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
I due evasi di Sing Sing
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of I due evasi di Sing Sing. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. MY OH MY 21:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
Happy birthday! Hi Daniel! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
Hi, Daniel! I think you closed this 2021 AfD perfectly accurately, but since that close, it's come to light that both the nominator User:RandomCanadian and the sole delete !voter User:No Great Shaker were socking. When I reassess the debate subtracting the users who we now know to have been in bad faith, I get to "no consensus" or even, arguably, "keep". In the circumstances would you be willing to consider restoring the article?—S Marshall T/C 09:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Stuart, hope you're well. The history is still preserved behind the redirect at Sidi Ahmed N'Ulqadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), happy for you to revert the redirect and restore the article given the issues with the nominator here. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, so it is. Thank you!—S Marshall T/C 11:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Hello, I've been addressing fostered content issues on Wikipedia over the past month and there are now only three remaining in usertalk space. One of these is on your User talk:Daniel/Archive/59. If you would be willing, would you replace the entire contents of the "Doczilla's RFA" section with the following code block (within the collapse) to correct the syntax issues (one fostered content error, a table tag issue, two obsolete tags, a missing end tag, and three stripped tags)? While I'd normally make a smaller change X to Y in this sort of situation, this particular section had layered issues and it is just easier to fix the whole thing in one go.
Change to the following
|
---|
{| |<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border-style: none; padding: 0px;"> <div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border-style: none; text-align: left; border: #dadada solid 2px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background: #006400; padding: 5px;"> <div class="NavHead" style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 10px; background: #{{User:Doczilla/Color}}; text-align: center; padding: 2px; font-size: 160%;"><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms; color:#006400">.:[[Image:Nuvola apps cache.png|30px]] ''[[Spectres_%28album%29#Side_one|Oh, no! There goes To-ky-o! Admin Doczilla!]]'' [[Image:Nuvola apps cache.png|30px]]:.</span></div> <div class="NavContent" style="background: none; text-align: center;"> {| class="wikitable" |- | align="left"|[[Image:Godzilla(01)reverse.jpg|275px|left]] | align="center"|<span style="font-size:24px">'''Thanks for !voting!'''</span><br><br> Thank you for !voting in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Doczilla|my RfA]] which resulted in the collapse of civilization with '''92''' (94?) '''support''', '''1 oppose''', and '''1 neutral'''.<br> Blame [[User:jc37|jc37]] and [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] for nominating me, everyone who had questions or comments, everyone who !voted, everyone who tallied the numbers correctly, and [[User:WJBscribe|WJBScribe]] who closed<br> without shouting, "No mop for you!" Seriously, your response has overwhelmed me.<br> I am deeply grateful. | [[Image:Speed_Limit_60_sign.svg|thumb|[[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ---- '''Thank you for casting the 60th yea vote.'''|100px]] |} <div class="NavHead" style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 10px; background: #FFFFFF; text-align: left; padding: 2px; font-size: 100%;"><span style="color:#000000"> [[Image:Nuvola apps korganizer.png|30px]] ''"The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot."'' - Michael Althsuler </span></div> {{#if: {{{1|}}}| {{User:1ne/Title{{!}}{{{1|}}}}}|}} <span style="position:-40px;left:-180px;z-index:100"></span> <div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; center:10px; :0px;" class="metadata" id="userGrmWnr"> {| style="background-color:#CFB53B;border: solid 2px #AA0000" |- |[[User:Doczilla|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">Doczilla</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Doczilla|RAWR!]]</sub> 07:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | <imagemap>Image:Nuvola filesystems folder home.png|30px|Home Page default [[User:Doczilla|In lieu of applauding you, Doczilla stomps on a warehouse.]] desc none</imagemap> |<imagemap>Image:Nuvola_apps_chat.png|30px|Talk Page default [[User_talk:Doczilla|What was that? I couldn't hear you over the crunch of that warehouse.]] desc none</imagemap> |<imagemap>Image:Laff alert.svg|30px|Joke Alert default [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User%3ADoczilla&diff=190347038&oldid=190345255 Oh, how quickly things change.] desc none</imagemap> |<imagemap>Image:Nuvola apps 3 cookie.png|30px|Presents default [[User:Doczilla/RfAThanks|Hard to believe I really do have a great life with plenty of better things to do than excessively personalize these thank you notes.]] desc none</imagemap> |}</div></div></div></div> |} |
Thank you, and if you have any questions, let me know. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @Zinnober9:, please feel free to make this change yourself (despite it being in "my" archive). Cheers, Daniel (talk) 04:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. The reason I was asking was more due to it being Full protected and my not being able to access it with my Extended Confirmed level access, rather than it being someone's archive, however. That said, WOSlinker took care of the fostered content error the other week, and all fostered content errors in User Talk space are now happily gone. I'd be happy to address the other errors on your talk page if given the access, but the main issue I was after the other week has been addressed. Zinnober9 (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]