User talk:DavidStarIsrael7

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Diante do Trono. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Evangelicalism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gustavo Bessa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gustavo Bessa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Contemporary worship music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Joshua Aaron

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Joshua Aaron. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Joshua Aaron (musician). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Joshua Aaron (musician) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to join a debate for James Stunt

@DavidStarIsrael7: I'm requesting you to join this Afd discussion. Your comment is valuable to us. Please help us reach a consensus. Thanks -Khocon (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juliano Son, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Christian films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Brazilian musicians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fernandinho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your edits on Brazilian Christian music-related articles and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 12:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Contemporary Christian music

Template:Contemporary Christian music has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Brazilian Christian leaders

Template:Brazilian Christian leaders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Contemporary Christian music of Brazil

Template:Contemporary Christian music of Brazil has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hillsong Church São Paulo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillsong Church São Paulo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillsong Church São Paulo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hillsong Church São Paulo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hillsong Church São Paulo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DavidStarIsrael7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diante do Trono

I am going to assume that you and the anon are the same editor. You did not see the comments I left on that talk page. I suggest you look at them. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Diante_do_Trono&type=revision&diff=827264737&oldid=827264483 is terrible. Fix it now! Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand you, when the article is with bad English, you want to keep it that way. When article grammar is improved, you do not want to. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidStarIsrael7: I do not understand you. 1) You're using two accounts. 2) I accepted the changes you made in the prose and only kept, and fixed, the infobox and the discography tables. And there are date formatting changes. So why are you damaging the article? Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, where does Águas Purificadoras link? And Exaltado. And Por Amor de Ti, Oh Brasil? And Tua Visão. And Hillsongs? The group don't even meet the criteria of an associated act. The actual associated acts, the ones you removed both as an anon and in reverting my corrections, have been removed. The discography is supposed to be in table format, not bullets. And WP:DATEUNIFY. So many problems and you're just adding to it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, if I see another unconstructive edit from either you or the anon account on the article, I will leave it in-place and start a sock-puppet investigation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Diante do Trono. {{Rough translation}} could be removed, even though it still reads poorly as explained on the anon's talk page. {{fanpov}} and {{refimprove}} cannot be.

The close proximity in time between the anon completing their edits and your removal of the template is another clear sign that you are either the same editor, or working together. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articles have been improved and such templates could be removed. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 02:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No the article was changed. There were many problems that were introduced. I have endeavoured to improve the article. If I introduced any factual errors or removed any vital (but unsourced) content, feel free to correct it. Do not attempt to make any wholesale changes to the article again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diante do Trono, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hillsong and Tu Reinas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Brazilian singers and bands of Christian music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Brazilian singers and bands of Christian music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Brazilian singers and bands of Christian music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joice Hasselmann to appear on the Main Page

Congratulations! Your article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page of Wikipedia in the Did You Know section. You may participate in the discussion here. For more information about the DYK process see "DYK For Newbies". – Lionel^(talk) 07:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joice Hasselmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Joice Hasselmann

Hello! Your submission of Joice Hasselmann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	You deserve it, dear friend!! MilenaSword1 (talk) 01:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	You deserve it! OMissel (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muralhas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muralhas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muralhas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pra Sempre Teu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pra Sempre Teu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pra Sempre Teu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deus Reina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deus Reina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deus Reina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glória a Deus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glória a Deus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glória a Deus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop disruptive behaviour in political articles

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jair Bolsonaro, you may be blocked from editing. Coltsfan (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what you doing is considered vandalism. You see, you are removing/altering information that is backed by reliable sources. As it is said on WP:VANDAL: [Vandalism is] The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia.

Vandalism? Disruptive edition? I did not perform any vandalism. Neither disruptive edition. I know the rules of Wikipedia and I insist on following them and complying with them. In the article Jair Bolsonaro, the edition I made is not a vandalism, quite the contrary, what I did was add an important information and a historical fact. Please be informed before you say anything. Thank you. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, i suggest you stop doing that, or you can be blocked from editing. You have been warned, so you cannot claim ignorance of the rules. Have a nice day, Coltsfan (talk) 22:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the article Brazilian military regime, may be, but my edition is correct in the article Jair Bolsonaro.

Please consider, because a reliable source will be added. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source you added is not a reliable one, per WP:SOURCETYPES. However, the source that currently is in the article is this one, from the Guardian, which clearly states: "Brazil’s extreme rightwing presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro might not seem an obvious mascot for a fizzy drink: he has praised the country’s military dictatorship". And the fact that the Brazilian military government was a dictatorship is hardly up for debate (sources: [1] [2] [3]). So again, you would be advised not to continue with the disruptive editing. Coltsfan (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to come up with a good reason for an admin to unblock you. Admin, CU-confirmed, see User talk:MilenaSword1. Drmies (talk) 23:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavidStarIsrael7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm resorting to the blockade simply because I see no reason for it. I find it unfair, because I am a good user who for years contributed with Wikipedia, creating and investing in numerous articles. I am a hardworking user and I know my duties, I also know the rules of Wikipedia and reverence him with great honor. I simply accessed Wikipedia and forgot to log into my account, so when I edited it was just showing my IP. This is not vandal. There is no reason to block. I believe that this decision was extremely hasty and wrong.

I need my account and my IP to be unlocked so that I can re-contribute to Wikipedia as I have always done, because I am a user who has contributed a lot to Wikipedia for years. I have already created dozens of articles and invested in many. I do not think this lock is fair for an irrelevant reason and a misunderstanding.

I want to make it clear that I have no connection with the user MilenaSword1, we are only partners of Wikipedia and by coincidence we live in the same state and we are interested in contemporary Christian music.

I try to continue editing articles of my interest, such as Christian music, history, geography and poetry. Please unblock me and my IP so I can continue contributing to Wikipedia as I have always done for all those years. Thank you! --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 00:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can't tell what you mean by "partners of Wikipedia", but "no connection" is implausible when the accounts are technically linked with one solely engaged in supporting the other in deletion discussions. Huon (talk) 00:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavidStarIsrael7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I said, there is no connection between me and the user MilenaSword1. Everything is based on assumption. It is true that we fight on the same side when we want to defend an article, that is true, but that we are different people with different opinions, this is also true. Anyway, I have the desire to contribute and I do not think it fair to be punished for an assumption, after all, she defends who she wants, I have nothing to do with it. I ask once more your understanding. Please unblock me. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 01:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have consulted with another CheckUser, and they have confirmed Drmies' findings to me. I have revoked your talk page access because of what appears to be lying to us in two unblock attempts. If you want to further appeal this block at this time, your best option would be to email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org TonyBallioni (talk) 02:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Joice Hasselmann is about to implode

I'm getting jacked up at our Joyce Hasselmann DYK so you need to hurry up and get back in the game. If we don't come up with an ALT1 this thing is toast.

I don't speak Portuguese!

Time for a mea culpa I think WP:CLEANSTART. – Lionel^(talk) 11:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Joice Hasselmann

Hello! Your submission of Joice Hasselmann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:DavidStarIsrael7/Rodrigo Silva

User:DavidStarIsrael7/Rodrigo Silva, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DavidStarIsrael7/Rodrigo Silva and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DavidStarIsrael7/Rodrigo Silva during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 06:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]