Jump to content

User talk:Dealuri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rădășeni

[edit]

Hello. I don’t want to destroy your work, but this encyclopedia does have certain rules about how articles are written.

My suggestions are three:

  • Create a sandbox. Here is a link for you: User:Dealuri/Sandbox. Paste the text there, and work on it until it’s ready.
  • Read some of the basic policies: WP:V, WP:CS, WP:RS. Work on your English; I suppose I can help with that. Look at some of these articles, to see how we should write about places: wikipedia:Featured_articles#Geography_and_places.
  • Once you’re ready, copy the text back from the sandbox into the main space.

I hope this helps. - Biruitorul Talk 11:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created your sandbox myself. Now, please be so kind as to work on your article there. Review the policies, look at the Featured Articles, and make sure it looks like them, or at least like it’s from the same solar system. Good luck. - Biruitorul Talk 22:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, Many thank you to create a sandbox.

I start to work from few days, filling 3 pages with link to Wikipedia and external link. After close internet, all data delete. Coud you please to advice how save data worked in sandbox? another, you are kindly enough to advice how to make a link to contents of CONTENT.

I am looking in policies:  WP:V,  WP:CS,  WP:RS. Featured Work, try my best to improve the quality.

Much appreciate your help, later on, in correcting of English Many thank Dealuri (talk) 04:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, tried several time to load picture on sandbox. do you like pls to help?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard/sandbox&withJS=MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js

Dealuri (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need some information

[edit]

Dear Sir, Many thank you your help to create a sandbox. Thank you too for your intention to help later with English correction, much appreciate.

i looked in features and basic policies, thank you again.

For moment, pls you are kindly enough to advice me: -from few days working (not continuous) to link to Wikipedia and external link. After finish few pages, internet close, when re-opened, lost all work. Could you pls to advice how to save b/f close internet? -there are Content. How to make a link from each subject of content please? Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 03:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll see what I can do over the next day or two. There really should be a citation (for example: <ref>Stan Vasile, Istoria Rădășenilor, p. 56. Suceava: Editura Cetatea Scaunului, 2001, ISBN 978-0-7646-23-1283</ref>) at the end of each sentence, so the information can be traced. - Biruitorul Talk 11:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, Thank you very much. Kindly give me few example, inside of article, on begin, than i will follow Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 10:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s start with an example: “From a deed from 1743, from the time of the ruler Constantin Mavrocordat , we find out that, around 1580, a church school functioned in Rădășeni.”

How do you know this? Where does the information appear? I assume there is some secondary source involved, that you did not look at a document from 1743. - Biruitorul Talk 15:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert about above informations, i investigate to see where to find doc.

I observed that you removed from article "History of one villager", understoog perhaps bcs not in connection with subject, History of Radaseni. Please can you advice where is removed? Can you give me a link? Because is not saved, and intend to make a new article about this Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 20:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“From a deed from 1743, from the time of the ruler Constantin Mavrocordat , we find out that, around 1580, a church school functioned in Rădășeni.” There is On tab 231 of Volume V of A. D. Xenopol's book. ELF Bucharest Publishing House, 2009. La fila 231 din volumul V al cărții lui A. D. Xenopol. Editura ELF București, 2009. "Astfel de scoli se infiintara in curind si la episcopiile de Roman si Radauti... Despre una din ele, aflam ca ar fi existat pe timpul copilariei lui Stefan Tomsa in satul Radaseni din tinutul Sucevei, renumit astazi pentru pomii sai roditori. Intr-un document posterior de la Constantin Mavrocordat din 1743, relativ la o hotarnica din Baia si mosnenii din Radaseni, mai multi dintre acestia marturisesc ca au apucat de la batrinii lor " ca fiind Stefan Tomsa Voda copil mic si sarac a invatat carte la scoala de aici din Radaseni, si miluindu-l Dzeu cu Domnia, a venit la Radaseni si le-a facut biserica si jeluind oamenii ca le locul strimt si n-au unde se hrani, le-au dat si o bucata de loc din hotarul Tirgului Baii [Baia]" Dealuri (talk) 05:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is a time to post, please? Dealuri (talk) 04:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re yours comment to:

'Interesting, but more of a personal story, not encyclopedic content'


True store of one of villager

ok, thank you , but Can't I do a new article with his real name?

His life was more interesting than most in wikipedia

Dealuri (talk) 05:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True store of one of villager

[edit]

'Interesting, but more of a personal story, not encyclopedic content'

Ok, thank you,but Can't I do a new article with his real name?

His life was more interesting than most in wikipedia

Dealuri (talk) 04:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Dear Sir, tried several time to load picture on sandbox. do you like pls to help?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard/sandbox&withJS=MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js Dealuri (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]
collapsing many, many image warnings, for navigation

Unspecified source/license for File:V.Manolache his ID 1975 age 61.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:V.Manolache his ID 1975 age 61.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Home made carpets & towels Rădășeni 1963.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Back cover of picture written in 1955-.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:His Father in 1916 - 36 old.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:His Father in 1916 - 36 old.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:A lady and young boy.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:A lady and young boy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Chalet in the winter.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chalet in the winter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:A lady and young.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:A lady and young.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cabana Radaseni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cabana Radaseni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cabana Rădăşeni bait.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cabana Rădăşeni bait.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cabana Rădăşeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cabana Rădăşeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Timbru poștal-Rădășeni, 1945.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Timbru poștal-Rădășeni, 1945.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica din centru din Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica din centru din Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica pe stil vechi.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica pe stil vechi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Satul Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Satul Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Primăria Rădăşeni o noua cladire.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni o noua cladire.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Primăria Rădăşeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Primăria Rădăşeni-sedinta.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni-sedinta.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cultural house.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cultural house.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Class room.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Class room.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Class room1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Class room1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni-discutiiicalduroase.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Tabara de vara-Asphar.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tabara de vara-Asphar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cetatuia cross.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cetatuia cross.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Timbru 1944 -Radaseni-Tomsa church.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Timbru 1944 -Radaseni-Tomsa church.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on File:Primăria Rădăşeni o noua cladire.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://carteaprimariilor.ro/?portfolio_page=primaria-comunei-radaseni. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Cetatuia cross.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://carteaprimariilor.ro/?portfolio_page=primaria-comunei-radaseni. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Timbru 1944 -Rădăşeni 3-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Timbru 1944 -Rădăşeni 3-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Timbru 1944 -Rădăşeni-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Timbru 1944 -Rădăşeni-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni s-a mutat in casa noua.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni-discutii calduroase.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Post Stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni 3-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Post Stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni 3-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Post stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Post stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Post 1944 -Radaseni-Tomsa church.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Post 1944 -Radaseni-Tomsa church.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Primăria Rădăşeni-sedinta-2019.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Primăria Rădăşeni-sedinta-2019.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Chalet in the winter 80'.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chalet in the winter 80'.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cultural home1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cultural home1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cabana Rădăşeni bait4.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cabana Rădăşeni bait4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Rădăşeni Chalet3.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rădăşeni Chalet3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica pe stil vechi1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica pe stil vechi1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cetăţuia cross.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cetăţuia cross.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Summer camp-Asphar1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Summer camp-Asphar1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni-Monument istoric.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Iarna la Rădășeni-3.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iarna la Rădășeni-3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Iarna la Rădășeni-1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iarna la Rădășeni-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Iarna la Radaseni-2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iarna la Radaseni-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Iarna la Radaseni-1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iarna la Radaseni-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica albă din centru din Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Post Stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni 4-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Post Stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni 4-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Buciumeni wooden church.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Buciumeni wooden church.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Old house Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Old house Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:View of Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:View of Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Monument of the heroes.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Monument of the heroes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Iarna la Rădășeni-2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iarna la Rădășeni-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Dumbrava minunata Buciumeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dumbrava minunata Buciumeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Casă in Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Casă in Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Casă in Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Casă in Rădășeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cabana Rădăşeni bait4.jpg

[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Cabana Rădăşeni bait4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Părintele Silvestru - mormintul de la Slătioara.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni3.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Biserica pe stil vechi2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica pe stil vechi2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Părintele Silvestru-mormintul de la Slătioara.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sobor de preoti de Boboteaza la Rădășeni 2019.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica albă din centru din Rădășeni2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica albă din centru din Rădășeni2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Hora Rădășenilor.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hora Rădășenilor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Slujba de pomenire a eroilor.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Slujba de pomenire a eroilor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Slujba de pomenire a eroilor1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Slujba de pomenire a eroilor1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Scoala Rădășeni-1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Scoala Rădășeni-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Scoala Rădășeni-2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Scoala Rădășeni-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cabana Rădăşeni-acuarela prof.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cabana Rădăşeni-acuarela prof.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Casa unde a locuit pentru un timp Creanga- cu inscriptie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Casa unde a locuit pentru un timp Creanga- vedere casa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Casa lui Sadoveanu- Intrarea de la poarta spre casa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Casa lui Sadoveanu- Inscripia de la poarta.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Hora Rădășenilor 2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hora Rădășenilor 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hora Rădășenilor 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/un-eveniment-de-suflet-festivalul-folcloric-hora-radasenilor/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Hora Rădăşenilor16.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hora Rădăşenilor16.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Hora Rădăşenilor5.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hora Rădăşenilor5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Casa lui Sadoveanu- Inscripia de la poarta.jpg

[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Casa lui Sadoveanu- Inscripia de la poarta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Hora Rădășenilor 2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hora Rădășenilor 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hora Rădășenilor 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/un-eveniment-de-suflet-festivalul-folcloric-hora-radasenilor/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hora Rădăşenilor16.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/un-eveniment-de-suflet-festivalul-folcloric-hora-radasenilor/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hora Rădăşenilor5.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/un-eveniment-de-suflet-festivalul-folcloric-hora-radasenilor/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Casa unde a locuit pentru un timp Creanga- cu inscriptie.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://falticenionline.com/2014/02/12/pretentiile-financiare-pentru-casa-lui-ion-creanga-sunt-exagerate/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Casa unde a locuit pentru un timp Creanga- vedere casa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://falticenionline.com/2014/02/12/pretentiile-financiare-pentru-casa-lui-ion-creanga-sunt-exagerate/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Casa lui Sadoveanu- Intrarea de la poarta spre casa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.cronicadefalticeni.ro/casa-memoriala-mihail-sadoveanu-organizeaza-zilele-sadoveanu/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Scoala Rădășeni-2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.ziaruldepenet.ro/2015/02/26/trei-elevi-din-radaseni-premiati-la-faza-judeteana-olimpiadei-de-educatie-tehnologica/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Slujba de pomenire a eroilor1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/ziua-eroilor-comemorata-la-radaseni-si-lamaseni/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Scoala Rădășeni-1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hora Rădășenilor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://dragusanul.ro/obiceiul-de-iarna-un-act-de-eroism-obstesc/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Sobor de preoti de Boboteaza la Rădășeni 2019.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.crainou.ro/2019/01/22/crestinii-ortodocsi-de-stil-vechi-au-sarbatorit-boboteaza/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Biserica de lemn din Rădășeni2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.stiridinbucovina.ro/2017/11/25/biserica-sfanta-mare-mucenita-ecaterina-din-suceava-biserica-veche-din-radaseni-si-biserica-din-berchisesti-isi-sarbatoresc-astazi-hramul/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Entrance gate in Rădășeni2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Dumbrava minunata Buciumeni.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.ziaruldepenet.ro/2017/04/15/un-oras-doua-secole-44-cabana-dumbrava-minunata-din-falticeni-de-la-distractia-din-comunism-la-credinta-din-capitalism/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Monument of the heroes.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sobor de 10 preoti de Boboteaza la Rădășeni 2019.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Sobor de 10 preoti de Boboteaza la Rădășeni 2019.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.crainou.ro/2019/01/22/crestinii-ortodocsi-de-stil-vechi-au-sarbatorit-boboteaza/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:100'years Old school Rădășeni renewed-1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Old house Rădășeni.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Iarna la Rădășeni-3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Biserica albă din centru din Rădășeni.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Whpq (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Biserica pe stil vechi1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Cetăţuia cross.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/390902551010971/photos/a.419273774840515/1037912319643321/?type=1&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Summer camp-Asphar1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.ziaruldepenet.ro/2016/07/21/catalin-badea-gheracostea-si-marian-coman-vin-la-tabara-asphar-de-la-radaseni/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Rădăşeni Chalet3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/Radaseni/photos/a.848431485196815/2495261933847087/?type=3&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Chalet in the winter 80'.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/Radaseni/photos/a.848431485196815/2495262020513745/?type=3&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Cultural home1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/lucrarile-de-modernizare-la-caminul-cultural-din-radaseni-s-au-incheiat-inainte-de-termen/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Primăria Rădăşeni s-a mutat in casa noua.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Primăria Rădăşeni-discutii calduroase.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.ziaruldepenet.ro/2017/11/29/comuna-radaseni-isi-cinsteste-dascalii-cu-titluri-de-cetatean-de-onoare/cetatean-de-onoare-radaseni3-29-11-2017/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Primăria Rădăşeni-sedinta.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Primăria Rădăşeni-sedinta-2019.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comunaradaseni.ro/neculai-perju-si-a-inceput-al-doilea-mandat-de-primar/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Replica house of Rădăşeni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Replica house of Rădăşeni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:3- Lost in a picturesque three churches in middl.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/radaseni.info.ro/photos/a.1563073400605296/1563073370605299/?type=1&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:2-Entrance gate in Rădăşeni, new shingle roof.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://falticenionline.com/2015/08/29/comuna-radaseni-are-un-nou-simbol-poarta-taraneasca-din-stejar-crescut-in-inima-transilvaniei/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Rădăşeni Chalet in the winter 80'.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://falticenionline.com/2018/09/26/va-amintiti-de-cabana-de-la-radaseni/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Bucharest,Street of Rădășeni.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bucharest,Street of Rădășeni.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:View of Rădășeni.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://ziarullumina.ro/societate/reportaj/radaseni-satul-muzeu-de-la-portile-bucovinei-107245.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Dear Sirs, I was blocked because of copyright violation.

I would like to inform you that as a beginner in Wikipedia, I have not realized the great importance of this deviation.  

In addition, some of the photos refused were actually taken by the undersigned, and yet removed, not knowing where and how to complain.

Other photos, being published on the internet, I asked them from the owners of the publications themselves, and sent them to me separately. The large number of rejections is also due to the lack of knowledge from the beginning of the references to the base, or even photos taken by the undersigned, but not registered as such.

Another, that I wasn't organized enough, to classify the pictures that were turned down in different folders. And sometimes the insistence with which I tried to resend the pictures. Indeed, some of them have been resumed disallowed, and I apologize.

Those were   major reason for the large number of refusals. Please unlock me, fully understanding the importance of copyright infringement. I want to complete a work started many months ago, before I sign up for Wikipedia

With thanks and respect, Dealuri Dealuri (talk) 14:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to inform you that as a beginner in Wikipedia, I have not realized the great importance of this deviation. In addition, some of the photos refused were actually taken by the undersigned, and yet removed, not knowing where and how to complain. Other photos, being published on the internet, I asked them from the owners of the publications themselves, and sent them to me separately. The large number of rejections is also due to the lack of knowledge from the beginning of the references to the base, or even photos taken by the undersigned, but not registered as such. Another, that I wasn't organized enough, to classify the pictures that were turned down in different folders. And sometimes the insistence with which I tried to resend the pictures. Indeed, some of them have been resumed disallowed, and I apologize. Those were major reason for the large number of refusals. Please unlock me, fully understanding the importance of copyright infringement. I want to complete a work started many months ago, before I sign up for Wikipedia With thanks and respect, Dealuri

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • What is copyright?

Is the right to use photos or any kind registered with the owner's consent, or with the citation of the basic source if it is accepted. There are many sources, not supported by Wikipedia

  • How is Wikipedia licenced?

Is freely licensed, its content can be used at any time. The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work)) which is identifiable in pictures

  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?

Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products

  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?

Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. If a picture is collage-of several pictures, it will be called the owner/link each picture of the collage is composed

  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

First and foremost, by using my own pictures, already over 200 of which can choose, since they do not know enough the use of links that are licensed,compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from  copyright owner.

I'll use free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"

  • (Find free-to-use images

Go to Advanced Image Search for images or Advanced Search for anything else.In the "all these words" box, type what you want to search.In the "Usage rights" section, use the drop-down to choose what kind of license you want the content to have.Select Advanced Search).

Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, when an accidentally incorrect picture will be posted and will be deleted due to violation-so as not to repeat it.

  • At the time of the lock, my work was turned back in time

Can you please bring the work with the contents to the date of the blockage? There have been many retouching small things that no longer appear.

  • Re my picture, atleast 2 pictures speeded deleted, despite my own. Can please to explain, to avoid for future?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dealuri?markasread=198429942%7C198429746&markasreadwiki=enwiki#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:100'years_Old_school_Rădășeni_renewed-1.jpg

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dealuri?markasread=198429942%7C198429746&markasreadwiki=enwiki#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:Iarna_la_Rădășeni-3.jpg

Many thank you, Dealuri (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  *In defense, in addition to above those shown, I say, that the article where I violated copyright, being sandbox, behind Wikipedia, in the shadows,for testing, I didn't realize it was as important,as if the article were published in front of Dealuri (talk) 08:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?

Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products

  • Further to above explanation, I add that, by violating copyrght, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself.

Instead of helping Wikipedia, by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I understand well, why it should not be copyrighted.

Dealuri (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

{unblock | reason=your reason here copyright violation} Dealuri (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One open unblock request at a time, please. You had three! --Yamla (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry please, because i don't know were to enter Dealuri (talk) 05:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Reply to question:

  • What is copyright?

Is the right to use photos or any kind registered

with the owner's consent, or with the citation of

the basic source if it is accepted. There are many


sources, not supported by Wikipedia


  • How is Wikipedia licenced?

Is freely licensed, its content can be used at any time.

The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work) which is identifiable in pictures

  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?

Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products.

 I add that, by violating copyrght, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself.

Instead of helping Wikipedia, by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I understand well, why it should not be copyrighted anymore in future..

  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?

Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. If a picture is collage-of several pictures, it will be called the owner/link each picture of the collage is composed

  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

First and foremost, by using my own pictures, already over 200 of which can choose, until know/learn  enough the use of links that are licensed,compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from  copyright owner.

I'll use free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"(Find free-to-use images)  

Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, when an accidentally incorrect picture will be posted and will be deleted due to violation-so as not to repeat it.

In defense, in addition to above those shown, I say, that the article where I violated copyright, being sandbox, behind Wikipedia, in background - shadows, considering to be just for testing, I didn't realize it was as important,as if the article were published in front of Wikipedia .

I'm ashamed of it, and I apologize, certainly that it will  not repeat (maybe only rarely and accidentally, by any typo only , and not by copyright )

If you accept the arguments, and you reinstate me, kindly request  bring the work with the contents to the date of the blockage ( my work was turned back in time and many retouching small things that no longer appear.)

Being a beginner, just one month entered, you are kindly enough to accept some errors, ( but in no case copyright errors or vandalism), like now, maybe unblock requested twice because no entered in proper case.

Many thank you for your understanding.

Dealuri (talk) 14:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


In the continuation of the previous request for un-block, I make further arguments re copyright:

Even copying a text with some changes, can be infringement of property rights, if there are similarities as a paraphrase close to, such a situation is serious, because copyright infringements not only harm Wikipedia, but also create legal problems.

That's why it's necessary and I understand this, like any action taken on Wikipedia, to reflect the productive contribution of the undersigned, and not with such violations, which unfortunately, I made.

Many thank youDealuri (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Now I understand why Wikipedia (that I've been reading for 15 years ) has such 80% credibility because of the strict rules that have to be followed.

Once  entered in this community,  must subordinate yourself to these necessary logical laws in order to be accepted.

And not as the undersigned thought, out of ignorance, stupidity (that I have no other explanation, since I constantly saw when the pictures were rejected, in red, that I could be blocked at any time) that everything is voluntary.

Many thank youDealuri (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why am I here?

As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community, I want to participate into improve it, according to my powers, by filling in some articles stub (such as the one I work on now, as a beginner) , but also by adding / improving some articles, as well as creating new articles, well documented, serious, scientific, studying in the library, from credible sources, mainly related to the history of places but also people, in the spirit of encicopledia, without breaking its rules.


And through community organizing meetings, so that we can get new, then documented information about certain interesting biographies, history, social events.

And later, to sign up to the "Programs and Events Dashboard"


I mention that the beginning of the current project, I consider documented enough, I did it without any help or advice from other participants, apart from the fact that initially, a volunteer of yours, made my sandbox, and gave me some initial advice.


The rest had to be hard work, to decipher each line of what it meant and where it took me.


Many Thank you Dealuri (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have three open unblock requests. Please considilate them into one, as you only need one (no, multiple appeals don't make it faster). Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Request reason:

Please disregard the previous three unlock requests, and consider this last one, all gathered in one:


Reply to question requested:


What is copyright?


Is the right to use photos or any kind registered with the owner's consent, or with the citation of the basic source if it is accepted. There are many sources, not supported by Wikipedia.


How is Wikipedia licenced?


Is freely licensed, its content can be used at any time. The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work) which is identifiable in pictures


Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?


Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products.

Even copying a text with some changes, can be infringement of property rights, if there are similarities as a paraphrase close to, such a situation is serious, because copyright infringements not only harm Wikipedia, but also create legal problems.


 I add that, by violating copyrght, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself.

Instead of helping Wikipedia, by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I understand well, why it should not be copyrighted anymore in future..


Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?


Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. If a picture is collage-of several pictures, it will be called the owner/link each picture of the collage is composed.

How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?


First and foremost, by using my own pictures, already over 200 of which can choose, until know/learn  enough the use of links that are licensed, compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from  copyright owner.

I'll use free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"(Find free-to-use images)  

Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, when an accidentally incorrect picture will be posted and will be deleted due to violation-so as not to repeat it by posting again.

Additional explanation:

 I say, that the article where I violated copyright, being sandbox, behind Wikipedia, in background -  considering to be just for testing, I didn't realize it was as important,as if the article were published in front of Wikipedia .

I'm ashamed of it, and I apologize, certainly that it will  not repeat (maybe only rarely and accidentally, by any typo only , and not by copyright )

Being a beginner, just one month entered, you are kindly enough to accept some errors, ( but in no case copyright  violalation), like now.

 I understand why Wikipedia (that I've been reading for 15 years ) has such high 80% credibility because of the strict rules that have to be followed.

Once  entered in this community,  must subordinate myself to these necessary logical laws in order to be accepted.


And not as the undersigned thought, out of ignorance, stupidity (that I have no other explanation, since I constantly saw when the pictures were rejected, in red, that I could be blocked at any time - a fragile explanation is that I worked  on the sandbox ) that everything is voluntary.


That's why it's necessary and I understand this, like any action taken on Wikipedia, to reflect the productive contribution of the undersigned, and not with such violations, which unfortunately, I made.


Why am I here?


As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community, I want to participate into improve it, according to my powers, by filling in some articles stub (such as the one I work on now, as a beginner) , but also by adding / improving some articles, as well as creating new articles, well documented, serious, scientific, studying in the library, from credible sources, mainly related to the history of places but also people, in the spirit of encicopledia, without breaking its rules.


And through community organizing meetings, so that we can get new, then documented information about certain interesting biographies, history, social events.

And later, to sign up to the "Programs and Events Dashboard"


I mention that the beginning of the current project, I consider documented enough, I did it without any help or advice from other participants, apart from the fact that initially, a volunteer of yours, made my sandbox, and gave me some initial advice.


The rest had to be hard work, to decipher each line of what it meant and where it took me.


If you accept the arguments, and you reinstate me, kindly request  bring the work with the contents to the date of the blockage ( my work was turned back in time and many long retouching small things that no longer appear.)


Many thank youDealuri (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why do you have so many open unblock requests? I'm sorry for being a bit rude here, but I'm not going to read through all these long unblock requests. I'm going to skip over all of them and decline them all. If you make another unblock request, make sure you only make one unblock request, and it is concise. This is a test of your ability to follow instructions, so please don't make four unblock requests again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sir, Many thank you to allow unblock request again. I was blocked due to violation of copyright –picture. As a beginner –just one month-, working on sandbox, in background - considering to be for testing, I didn't realize it was as important , as if the article were published in front , and now I understand it's same. Once entered in this community, must subordinate myself necessary logical laws in order to be accepted. And not as the undersigned thought, out of ignorance –( a fragile explanation is that I worked on sandbox ) that everything is voluntary. Any action taken on Wikipedia, to reflect the productive contribution , and not with such violations, which unfortunately, I made. By violating copyright, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself. Instead of helping , by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I teach well, why it should not be copyrighted anymore in future Reply to question requested: What is copyright? Right to use photos or any kind registered with the owner's consent, or with the citation of the basic source if it is accepted. Even copying a text with some changes, can be infringement of property rights .There are many sources, not supported by Wikipedia. How is Wikipedia licensed? Freely licensed, its content can be used at any time. The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work) which is identifiable in pictures Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? As an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? By using in principal, my own pictures, over 200 of which can choose; to use of links that are licensed, compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from copyright owner; free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"; Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, to avoid repeated accidentally incorrect posted. Why am I here? As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community, I want to participate into improve some articles, as well as creating new articles, well documented, from credible sources, mainly related to the history of places, people, in the spirit of Encyclopedia, without breaking its rules. Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 1:23 am, 5 September 2020, last Saturday (3 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Based on the writings throughout this page, I do not believe you have the competence required to edit the English Wikipedia. As such, I am declining this and revoking talk page access. only (talk) 01:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 

September 2020

[edit]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 only (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:A young man hiking.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused {{userspace file}}.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magog the Ogre (tc) 23:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dealuri at utrs and unblock discussion

[edit]

Carrying over from UTRS appeal #34757--

In summar ,I will follow the rule: In principal, using own picture/video, creation. Use : images, photographs, video and sound files, like written works, explicitly been placed in the public domain For permission to use non-free content , I will contact the owner , asking to send a e-mail special permission, making a note of that fact and use under the conditions given by the copyright holder Fair use exceptions being ill-defined, and at this stage of newcomer, I will avoid to use. However, for verification - looking on image description page, review page footer, page history, discussion page . I will verify for freely compatibly licensed (text with CC BY -SA 3.0) or public domain If I import media under a compatible license which requires attribution, I will credit the author. If original source contains a copyright disclaimer or other indicate free for use, a link to it is enough . I cite its sources by link to copyrighted material I will use quotations I never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others . In doubt, not use, or I write the content myself. I will reformulate the concepts in my own words, make distinction between summary and abridgment . Many thank you

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: copying my reply from my talk page to here: If you're comfortable with unblocking, you're welcome to. I'm still a little worried about allowing them to upload as they definitely did a lot of that in a little time it seems, but their statement does seem to hit the important parts of copyright. Looking again at their uploads, I feel like the bulk may have been outside project scope as well. Perhaps a restriction from the File domain to begin is something to consider. only (talk) 10:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm obviously, not the blocking admin. In my opinion, this does not show a clear understanding of WP:FAIRUSE. Fair-use is notoriously hard to understand, though. I'd support unblocking with a restriction from the File namespace. I do not support an unblock otherwise, but don't object if someone else wants to do so. WP:ROPE could certainly apply, so long as someone can keep an eye on the uploads. --Yamla (talk) 10:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My repleis, carried over from UTRS appeal #34757

deepfriedokra 2020-09-24 13:07:43I've copied the summarized unblock request. You should read the discussion there. Will likely restore talk page access so you can request unblocking there. There are concerns. It will be best if you agree to avoid file uploads for a while. There is also a concern with your proficiency in English-- it might not be sufficient for encyclopedia building. If you have an English language spell checker, it would be best to spell check everything before posting. (I have tremors and am a little dyslexic, I run a lot of my posts through a spell checker first.) Awaiting futher responses from other admins.

deepfriedokra 2020-09-24 13:52:44 Yeah, definitely need to agree to not upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload.

deepfriedokra 2020-09-24 15:43:36 If you upload images, they should be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and should only be images taken by you.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sir, Thank you for un-blocked Talk page.

I will not violate  copyright (which is a license similar to the contract)

Definitely and deeply understand and agree to not  upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload 

If I upload images, will be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and  only be images taken by myself.


Non free-media - Fair use exceptions, being ill-defined , i will not use .

Regarding proficiency in English , i will do my best and  i will use  spell check everything before posting. 

I will reduce sentences to the essentials, in a clear and concise manner. 

Many thank you  Dealuri (talk) 03:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sirs,

It's been two weeks since I applied for un-block and no administrator has made a decision -(Decline stale).

1. Understand what I have been blocked for : copyright violation -(which is a license similar to the contract) by uploading  several pictures :not specifying the copyright status ; copyrighted  taken from other web sites ;

At the time of violation, as a beginner, not understood such regulations, and more, that Wikipedia's editing policy applies to all pages, including sandbox (where article it was under construction). 

Definitely and deeply learned from my mistakes and agree to not  upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload .

If I upload images, at this stage- will be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and  only be images taken by myself.


2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption , but obey and follow Wikipedia law/policy:

-A person who creates a work, becomes its owner - not to copyright violate.

Wikipedia is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law.

Fair use exceptions being ill-defined, notoriously hard to understand , i will not use .


3.Will make useful contributions instead.

Regarding  uploads project  I will improve it, to be in line with the severe demands of the encyclopedia:

Reduce sentences to the essentials. Wordiness does not add credibility to Wikipedia articles. Vigorous, effective writing is clear and concise. 

 Not  try to convince the reader of anything, only to provide the salient facts as best they can be determined, and the reliable sources for them.

Present the sourced information without embellishment, agenda, fanfare, cleverness, or conversational tone.

Copyediting involves the "five Cs":  clear, correct, concise, comprehensible,  consistent.

Eliminate expressions that are flattering, disparaging, vague, clichéd, or endorsing of a particular viewpoint.

Use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Very important to say it in my own words. 

I cite its sources by link to copyrighted material I will use quotations I never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others . In doubt, not use, or I write the content myself. I will reformulate the concepts in my own words, make distinction between summary and abridgment . 


However, always new article or contribution to stub article, will be work on sandbox, then  I'll ask for help from an administrator to check, to see if it's ripe for the main page . I will never post directly, without checking.

Many thank you  Dealuri (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, the unblock request does not show that you are able to follow Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please see below. — Newslinger talk 15:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Widr, Yamla, NinjaRobotPirate, Only, Deepfriedokra, and Rosguill: I think the above shows that Dealuri has read the relevant policies and guidelines, and would most likely make a good-faith effort to adhere to them if unblocked. However, reading the policies is different from understanding them, and there is also a language barrier in this case. What are your thoughts on unblocking Dealuri in all namespaces expect the File namespace (implemented as a partial block)? — Newslinger talk 05:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I didn't check the rest of it, but compare this:
  • Wikipedia:Basic copyediting: Copyediting involves the "five Cs": making the article clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, and consistent.
  • Unblock request: Copyediting involves the "five Cs":  clear, correct, concise, comprehensible,  consistent.
  • Wikipedia:Writing better articles: Reduce sentences to the essentials. Wordiness does not add credibility to Wikipedia articles.
  • Unblock request: Reduce sentences to the essentials. Wordiness does not add credibility to Wikipedia articles. Vigorous, effective writing is clear and concise.
I'm not sure this person understands the concept of writing in your own words. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good point. Dealuri, instead of copying and pasting your unblock request from other pages, could you please paraphrase this text in your own words? We just want to see some evidence that you are able to paraphrase text. — Newslinger talk 06:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • They just copy-pasted item three responses from within Wikipedia. (Didn't search for the rest.) OH. I see NJP's response. What NJP said. Copypasting our rules is, as said above, not understanding our rules. And they copy pasted w/o attribution.
  • No mention of running their contribs-written-in-their-own-words through a spell checker. Where their own words are used, it is in broken English.
  • Needs to understand there would be zero tolerance for further copyvio issues.
  • Skeptical, so neutral. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm opposed to an unblock, given the concerns above. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am as well, pending a more successful attempt to explain policies in their own words. signed, Rosguill talk 15:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gentlemen, thanks for the advice.

Regarding your various opinions: I have not hidden that the information given to you, I have selected them from several articles, including the Copyright, without passing them through my words.


I wanted to prove that I read them, but I understood them. The amount of information is immense, on the   background of the main Encyclopedia pages (over 6 million articles)  is another Encyclopedia full of information, which I strive with my strength to learn as deeply as possible, especially the copyrighted part, both texts and photos.

This, on the one hand that the site of Wikipedia is in the US, and is subject to the draconian rules there, on the other hand, for the sake of order.


I was asked what it means to "in my words"-paraphrasing/rephrasing : : a good example is a poem/poetry transcribed  into prose,( apply also to any author text )  becomes a new work, derivative, independent, but which, necessarily, must assign to the primary source, who wrote it- citation or link. The modification must be sufficiently enough to consider separate work- which implies a developed vocabulary and a sufficient culture ( as a result of a deep reading in the past, which, forgive my lack of modesty only in this case, I consider to have accumulated).


In the case of citation of an exact sentence from an author, it is done by "quotes ", including if there is any original mistake, with  [sic]

I will avoid poor paraphrasing of a material from a source, exposed in my own words, and I will add the source/author. Without this attribution, it can be plagiarism.


Translations are also separate, derivative  works, but equally, mandatory, must be indicated the original source,/author, even Wikipedia article, which is under copyleft license.

Regarding the pictures, I clearly understood their meaning in the context and importance of copyright, as I have written in many previous messages. And I will abide by the rule "zero tolerance".  

In case you unblock me, and kindly ask this , the works posted on the sandbox, I will ask for your help to be checked before being placed on the main page.  

The existed work on the sandbox, called "Radaseni", which has been deleted, (I'll pray to me back) I think it has some elements of good behavior, with the inherent mistakes of the very beginner, can be seen by you . I worked on it for two months, but basically the information I gathered over a period of over a  year.


Realize I still have a lot to learn, like a driver who takes his license and knows very little.


Regarding editing article/stub, in summary, an article must be clear and concise, without unnecessary words, every word to express something, the shorter a sentence, the deeper it becomes.< William Strunk, Jr. from the 1918 work, The Elements of Style https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/6437238.William_Strunk_><https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles>

 Many Thank you,  Dealuri (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dealuri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Gentlemen, thanks for the advice. Regarding your various opinions: I have not hidden that the information given to you, I have selected them from several articles, including the Copyright, without passing them through my words. I wanted to prove that I read them, but I understood them. The amount of information is immense, on the background of the main Encyclopedia pages (over 6m articles) is another Encyclopedia full of information, which I strive with my strength to learn as deeply as possible, especially the copyrighted violation part (use of any kind of works protected by copyright law without permission for a usage), both texts and photos. This, on the one hand that the site of Wikipedia is in the US, and is subject to the draconian rules there-(up to $150k fine for each work infringed or even jail -<https://www.lib.purdue.edu/uco/CopyrightBasics/penalties.html>) on the other hand, for the sake of order. I was asked what it means to "in my words"-paraphrasing/rephrasing : : a good example is a poem/poetry transcribed into prose,( apply also to any author text ) becomes a new work, derivative, independent, but which, necessarily, must assign to the primary source, who wrote it- citation or link. The modification must be sufficiently enough to consider separate work- which implies a developed vocabulary and a sufficient culture ( as a result of a deep reading in the past, which, forgive my lack of modesty only in this case, I consider to have accumulated). In the case of citation of an exact sentence from an author, it is done by "quotes ", including if there is any original mistake, with [sic] I will avoid poor paraphrasing of a material from a source, exposed in my own words, and I will add the source/author. Without this attribution, it can be plagiarism. Translations are also separate, derivative works, but equally, mandatory, must be indicated the original source,/author, even Wikipedia article, which is under copyleft license. Regarding the pictures, I clearly understood their meaning in the context and importance of copyright, as I have written in many previous messages, and I will abide by the rule "zero tolerance". Definitely understand and agree to not upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload If I upload images, will be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and only be images taken by myself. In case you unblock me, and kindly ask this , the works posted on the sandbox (I'll always work initially on the sandbox), I will ask for your help to be checked before being placed on the main page. The existed work on the sandbox, called "Radaseni", which has been deleted, (I'll pray to me back) I think it has some elements of good behavior, with the inherent mistakes of the very beginner, can be seen by you . I worked on it for two months, but basically the information I gathered over a period of over a year. I Realize I still have a lot to learn, like a driver who takes his license and knows very little. Regarding editing article/stub, in summary, an article must be clear simple and concise, without unnecessary words, the shorter a sentence, the deeper it becomes < William Strunk, Jr. from the 1918 work, The Elements of Style https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/6437238.William_Strunk_><https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles> Many Thank you Dealuri (talk) 5:20 am, 5 November 2020, Thursday (14 days ago) (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Hello Dealuri. Having reviewed your contributions to Wikipedia, combined with your several unblock requests here, I am sorry but I have to agree with my colleagues that you don't at the moment have the appropriate skills and knowledge to edit this encyclopaedia. Your edits are quite harmful. Though we do boast that Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" we do require that editors have sufficient competence. However, that I am declining your request now, doesn't mean you can never edit Wikipedia. After waiting at least six months, you can make another appeal. I would strongly suggest that such an appeal should be very short, and that in your appeal you agree not to upload any images or files. If your appeal is granted, it may include an agreement that you could appeal the restriction on uploading images and files after six months of productive and trouble free editing has passed. SilkTork (talk) 15:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Post Stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni 3-.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:His Father in 1916 - 36 old.jpeg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:His Father in 1916 - 36 old.jpeg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Back cover of picture written in 1955-.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 09:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna -2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-3.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-4.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-5.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-6.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-7.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna -2.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna -2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-1.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Hora Rădăşeni- people -1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused picture of random crowd. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:A lady and young.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]