User talk:Doctor Papa Jones/Archive 13
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Doctor Papa Jones. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Your GA nomination of Gregor Strasser
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gregor Strasser you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gregor Strasser
The article Gregor Strasser you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gregor Strasser for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Congrats, on another one. Kierzek (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Kierzek, and thanks to you for helping out during the GA-review. :) Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 13:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- No problem; working to bring articles up to GA is a worthwhile cause. Kierzek (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Kierzek, and thanks to you for helping out during the GA-review. :) Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 13:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Twin Rivers Multimedia Film Festival
Hi, I've done a bit of work on Twin Rivers Multimedia Film Festival. I'll do some more later. At this stage do you think the citation style tag is still warranted? Thanks Mr Bill Truth (talk) 14:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Mr Bill Truth. Yes, the citation style tag is still needed - the style currently featured is not correct. See the article Adolf Hitler for proper citation. Cheers! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 18:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Giraudi Group
Hello, I saw what you said about the Giraudi English page that I have created this morning. I am surprised because it's a simple translation. Please note that I have translated all of the links/notes in English for easier understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonodemonaco (talk • contribs) 14:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Nonodemonaco. The article is written like an advertisement and does not have proper citation which is why I added the tags. Cheers! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 18:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Jonas Vinther, according to your comment I have modified the content of the article, but I'm confused please tell me what do you mean exactly by "proper citation" ? We have more than 30 links and references which I have also translated. It's my first article so I'm a little bit lost, could you please help me to fix the problem you have hightlighted in this article ? Thank you in advance for your help. Nonodemonaco (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Please take care when patrolling articles like that. You've tagged it as reviewed but there are no serious claims to notability on the page, it just says that it is a football club based in London, which is not notable in itself and at least a CSD:A7 case straight off. Worse, the sheer number of overseas players supposedly playing for them looks highly suspect to begin with, as does the fact that it's claimed that they have players on loan or out at loan at top sides such as Milan, Tottenham, Lyon and Everton. Would an unknown London club really do that? Highly unlikely. It's really important to avoid hoaxes like that slipping through new page patrol. Valenciano (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Valenciano. I actually don't recall ever patrolling this specific page, but if you say so I don't it doubt as I've reviewed a lot these past days. I only just started reviewing days ago so I'm still learning. Thanks for the notice. Best! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 19:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
File source problem with File:SS leader Heinrich Himmler in 1907 with his two brothers.gif
Thank you for uploading File:SS leader Heinrich Himmler in 1907 with his two brothers.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:15, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I have put this article up for GA review. Given you worked on it, you cannot do the review, but if you have anything to add to it, now is the time. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 12:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well done mate. New additions looks great. I'll be sure to check it out later one. Cheers for the notice. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 12:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- It passed. Kierzek (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- That was quick. Well done mate. :) Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 22:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- It passed. Kierzek (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Tenkai Palm demonstrated by Dave Buck, 2008.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Tenkai Palm demonstrated by Dave Buck, 2008.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Broken heart
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Broken heart you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Valereee -- Valereee (talk) 21:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For helping me bring Joseph Berchtold to GA-status. Tak, Kierzek (talk) 22:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC) |
- You're way too kind. :) Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 22:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maria Limanskaya
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maria Limanskaya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Hitler clapping the cheek of Edda Göring, daughter of the Luftwaffe chief Hermann Göring, unknown date.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Hitler clapping the cheek of Edda Göring, daughter of the Luftwaffe chief Hermann Göring, unknown date.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Broken heart - nonconstructive edits
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Broken heart. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The revert function is for vandalism, not good faith edits. A lot of time was put into that contribution by a professional in the field. If you would like to discuss specifics of any section, please open a discussion on the TALK PAGE. I have undone the edit. Wiki-psyc (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wiki-psyc, with due respect, I see you are relatively new to Wikipedia and from my look at the article it appears that Jonas has been working to made changes per the GA reviewer's points and suggestions. See the talk page as to the GA review and guys do work together for improving the article and raising it to GA status. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wiki-psyc, I find this "Welcome to Wikipedia" message and "no one owns articles" notice somewhat odd! Anyway, the edits you made to the article shows you haven't familiarized yourself with WP:MOS, which is why I party reverted it, especially since the article is a GA-nomination currently undergoing review. And cheers Kierzek. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 11:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- The only matter of relevance is a 750 word contribution with 20 inline citations from medical texts and journals being reverted (discarded in total) with the comment not exactly an improvement. This is not in the best interests of the article or an acceptable Wikipedia practice. Nothing in the GA nomination or the WP:MOS justify a revert. Discuss any specific content issues or formatting on the TALK PAGE. Please do not revert again. Thanks.
Wiki-psyc (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)- Duly noted. Cheers, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 15:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- I've opened a discussion on the TALK PAGE so that we may better coordinate. I realize that this large addition impacts the overall sectioning of the article and the way the citations are formatted. Wiki-psyc (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Duly noted. Cheers, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 15:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- The only matter of relevance is a 750 word contribution with 20 inline citations from medical texts and journals being reverted (discarded in total) with the comment not exactly an improvement. This is not in the best interests of the article or an acceptable Wikipedia practice. Nothing in the GA nomination or the WP:MOS justify a revert. Discuss any specific content issues or formatting on the TALK PAGE. Please do not revert again. Thanks.
- Wiki-psyc, I find this "Welcome to Wikipedia" message and "no one owns articles" notice somewhat odd! Anyway, the edits you made to the article shows you haven't familiarized yourself with WP:MOS, which is why I party reverted it, especially since the article is a GA-nomination currently undergoing review. And cheers Kierzek. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 11:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Broken heart
The article Broken heart you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Broken heart for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Valereee -- Valereee (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 15:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maria Limanskaya
The article Maria Limanskaya you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maria Limanskaya for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Interview with Dan and Dave Buck, 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Interview with Dan and Dave Buck, 2008.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Image of an adult Edda Göring, daugther of Hermann Göring.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Image of an adult Edda Göring, daugther of Hermann Göring.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Regarding non-free use.
I've tagged a few of your images as disputed non-free image use. Please note that WP:NFCC#1 states "no free equivalent is available, or could be created". For living people and other subjects for which a free photograph could plausibly be obtained, fair-use does not apply: a suitably licensed photograph could be taken by an attendee at a public event, or permission to release existing images under a free license might be granted upon request to the copyright holder. It would be great to grab any image off the internet for subjects lacking photographs, but unfortunately we can only do so when [[all ten criteria are met. See also what is considered acceptable non-free image use and unacceptable non-free image use. Thank you, --Animalparty! (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dan and Dave (magicians), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sybil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
notification
I have no clue why you are pinged. Do you have their talk pages on your watch list? Maybe this triggers something. I am only speculating here MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)